Suppr超能文献

罗诉韦德案被推翻对女性的跨系统和跨境影响。

Repercussions of overturning Roe v. Wade for women across systems and beyond borders.

机构信息

School of Sociological and Anthropological Studies, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Leeds Institute Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Reprod Health. 2022 Aug 24;19(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01490-y.

Abstract

June 24th, 2022, a day that will be etched in today and future generations' textbooks as a historic day, the United States of America revoked the constitutional right to seek safe abortion care. Overturning Roe v Wade allowed the divided individual states to independently decide the legal parameters regarding abortion care. A decision that disproportionately effects the reproductive lives of women residing on the land of America. Given the systemic impacts of racism, neoliberalism and white supremacy, it is the Black, racialized and poor women who suffer terrible repercussions. In this commentary the authors begin by discussing the historical biopolitical perspective, colonial systems and longstanding impacts on racialized women's bodies in America. The discussion transitions to the implications of geopolitics at play nationally and cascading impacts globally, focusing on humanitarian and emergency settings. Using a medical humanities perspective, authors highlight the collision between politics and reproductive health policy and its implications on social determinants of health, such as women's education, employment, housing, racial and gender equity and wellbeing. Long standing advocates, community leaders and healers, leading scientists, birth attendants, doctors, nurses, allied health professionals/providers and humanitarian workers - and many others - are reminded and live the weight of the continuous battle of population control, stemming from the oppressive history of control and exploitation.

摘要

2022 年 6 月 24 日,这一天将作为一个具有历史意义的日子被载入当今和未来的教科书,美利坚合众国废除了寻求安全堕胎护理的宪法权利。推翻罗诉韦德案(Roe v Wade)允许分裂的个别州独立决定有关堕胎护理的法律参数。这一决定对居住在美国土地上的妇女的生殖生活产生了不成比例的影响。鉴于种族主义、新自由主义和白人至上主义的系统性影响,遭受可怕后果的是黑人、种族化和贫困妇女。在这篇评论中,作者首先讨论了历史生物政治视角、殖民制度以及它们对美国种族化妇女身体的长期影响。讨论转向了地缘政治在国内发挥的作用以及在全球范围内的连锁影响,重点关注人道主义和紧急情况。作者采用医学人文学科的观点,强调了政治和生殖健康政策之间的碰撞及其对健康的社会决定因素的影响,如妇女的教育、就业、住房、种族和性别平等以及福祉。长期的倡导者、社区领袖和治疗师、领先的科学家、接生员、医生、护士、联合健康专业人员/提供者和人道主义工作者——以及许多其他人——都被提醒并感受到人口控制的持续斗争的重担,这源于控制和剥削的压迫历史。

相似文献

1
Repercussions of overturning Roe v. Wade for women across systems and beyond borders.
Reprod Health. 2022 Aug 24;19(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01490-y.
2
Overturning Roe v. Wade: consequences for midlife women's health and well-being.
Womens Midlife Health. 2023 Jan 6;9(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40695-022-00085-8.
3
Overturning Roe v Wade and Planned Parenthood v Casey: An Assault to Reproductive and Racial Justice and the Mental Health of Youth.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Apr;63(4):393-395. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2023.08.013. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
4
"Shouldn't Nobody Make a Woman do What they Don't Want to do with their Body": Black Women's Reactions to the Supreme Court's Overturn of Roe v. Wade.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Apr;11(2):968-979. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01577-7. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
5
Religion and abortion: Roman Catholicism lost in the pelvic zone.
Womens Health Issues. 1993 Fall;3(3):132-7. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(05)80246-4.
6
The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1993 Summer;2(3):309-19. doi: 10.1017/s096318010000431x.
7
The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health.
Nurse Pract. 1991 Dec;16(12):53-9. doi: 10.1097/00006205-199112000-00013.
8
Abortion in America: 12 years after Roe v. Wade.
Popul Today. 1985 Nov;13(11):2, 8-9.
9
Post-Roe emergency medicine: Policy, clinical, training, and individual implications for emergency clinicians.
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Dec;29(12):1414-1421. doi: 10.1111/acem.14609. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
10
Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
Womens Health Issues. 1993 Fall;3(3):162-70. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(05)80251-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Fluctuating recovery: Trajectories of young adult mental health through the COVID-19 pandemic 2020-2022.
J Affect Disord. 2025 Jun 16;389:119694. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.119694.
2
Flowing data: women's views and experiences on privacy and data security when using menstrual cycle tracking apps.
Oxf Open Digit Health. 2025 May 17;3:oqaf011. doi: 10.1093/oodh/oqaf011. eCollection 2025.
4
Determining the Impact of the Reversal of Roe v. Wade on Birth Control and Infertility Trends Using Google Trends.
Cureus. 2024 Nov 26;16(11):e74503. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74503. eCollection 2024 Nov.
7
Missed period? The significance of period-tracking applications in a post- America.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(4):2238940. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2238940.
8
Comparing Virtual vs In-Person Immersive Leadership Training for Physicians.
J Healthc Leadersh. 2023 Aug 11;15:139-152. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S411091. eCollection 2023.
10
Rational Design of Nanomedicine for Placental Disorders: Birthing a New Era in Women's Reproductive Health.
Small. 2024 Oct;20(41):e2300852. doi: 10.1002/smll.202300852. Epub 2023 May 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Overturning Roe vs Wade undermines US cancer care.
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Aug;23(8):987. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00389-8. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
2
The fall of Roe Wade: the fight for abortion rights is universal.
BMJ. 2022 Jun 29;377:o1608. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o1608.
3
Overturning Roe v Wade: reproducing injustice.
BMJ. 2022 Jun 27;377:o1588. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o1588.
4
What Overturning Roe v Wade May Mean for Assisted Reproductive Technologies in the US.
JAMA. 2022 Jul 5;328(1):15-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.10163.
5
Implications for racial inequities in maternal health if Roe v Wade is lost.
Lancet. 2022 Jul 2;400(10345):9-11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01024-8. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
6
Navigating Loss of Abortion Services - A Large Academic Medical Center Prepares for the Overturn of .
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jun 2;386(22):2061-2064. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2206246. Epub 2022 May 11.
8
Global Gag Rule must be repealed for good.
Lancet HIV. 2021 Mar;8(3):e121. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00027-8.
9
The impacts of the global gag rule on global health: a scoping review.
Glob Health Res Policy. 2019 Aug 29;4:26. doi: 10.1186/s41256-019-0113-3. eCollection 2019.
10
Medical Compared With Surgical Abortion for Effective Pregnancy Termination in the First Trimester.
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;126(1):22-8. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000910.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验