• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间,癌症患者的死亡率预测算法中的性能漂移。

Performance drift in a mortality prediction algorithm among patients with cancer during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Jan 18;30(2):348-354. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac221.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocac221
PMID:36409991
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9846686/
Abstract

Sudden changes in health care utilization during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic may have impacted the performance of clinical predictive models that were trained prior to the pandemic. In this study, we evaluated the performance over time of a machine learning, electronic health record-based mortality prediction algorithm currently used in clinical practice to identify patients with cancer who may benefit from early advance care planning conversations. We show that during the pandemic period, algorithm identification of high-risk patients had a substantial and sustained decline. Decreases in laboratory utilization during the peak of the pandemic may have contributed to drift. Calibration and overall discrimination did not markedly decline during the pandemic. This argues for careful attention to the performance and retraining of predictive algorithms that use inputs from the pandemic period.

摘要

在严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 (SARS-CoV-2) 大流行期间,医疗保健利用的突然变化可能影响了在大流行之前训练的临床预测模型的性能。在这项研究中,我们评估了一种机器学习、基于电子健康记录的死亡率预测算法的性能随时间的变化,该算法目前在临床实践中用于识别可能受益于早期预先护理计划对话的癌症患者。我们表明,在大流行期间,算法识别高危患者的能力大幅且持续下降。大流行高峰期实验室利用的减少可能导致了偏差。在大流行期间,校准和整体判别能力并没有明显下降。这就要求对使用大流行期间输入的预测算法的性能和再培训给予谨慎关注。

相似文献

1
Performance drift in a mortality prediction algorithm among patients with cancer during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间,癌症患者的死亡率预测算法中的性能漂移。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Jan 18;30(2):348-354. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac221.
2
Performance Drift in a Mortality Prediction Algorithm during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.SARS-CoV-2大流行期间死亡率预测算法的性能漂移
medRxiv. 2022 Mar 1:2022.02.28.22270996. doi: 10.1101/2022.02.28.22270996.
3
The Development and Validation of Simplified Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Prognosis of Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: Multicenter, Retrospective Study.中文译文:简化机器学习算法预测 COVID-19 住院患者预后的开发和验证:多中心回顾性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 21;24(1):e31549. doi: 10.2196/31549.
4
Clinical Features of Emergency Department Patients from Early COVID-19 Pandemic that Predict SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Machine-learning Approach.早期新冠疫情期间急诊科患者的临床特征预测 SARS-CoV-2 感染:机器学习方法。
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Mar 4;22(2):244-251. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.12.49370.
5
Algorithms for predicting COVID outcome using ready-to-use laboratorial and clinical data.使用即用型实验室和临床数据预测 COVID 结局的算法。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 14;12:1347334. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1347334. eCollection 2024.
6
Machine learning decision tree algorithm role for predicting mortality in critically ill adult COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU.机器学习决策树算法在预测 ICU 收治的危重症成年 COVID-19 患者死亡率中的作用。
J Infect Public Health. 2022 Jul;15(7):826-834. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.06.008. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
7
Living risk prediction algorithm (QCOVID) for risk of hospital admission and mortality from coronavirus 19 in adults: national derivation and validation cohort study.成人因冠状病毒 19 住院和死亡风险的生存风险预测算法(QCOVID):全国推导和验证队列研究。
BMJ. 2020 Oct 20;371:m3731. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3731.
8
Assessing the effects of data drift on the performance of machine learning models used in clinical sepsis prediction.评估数据漂移对临床脓毒症预测中使用的机器学习模型性能的影响。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 May;173:104930. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104930. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
9
Clinical Predictive Models for COVID-19: Systematic Study.新型冠状病毒肺炎的临床预测模型:系统研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 6;22(10):e21439. doi: 10.2196/21439.
10
Using explainable machine learning to characterise data drift and detect emergent health risks for emergency department admissions during COVID-19.利用可解释的机器学习来描述数据漂移,并在 COVID-19 期间检测急诊科入院的新出现的健康风险。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 26;11(1):23017. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02481-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance Drift in a Nationally Deployed Population Health Risk Algorithm in the US Veterans Health Administration.美国退伍军人健康管理局全国部署的人口健康风险算法中的性能漂移
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Aug 1;6(8):e252717. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2717.
2
Emerging algorithmic bias: fairness drift as the next dimension of model maintenance and sustainability.新兴的算法偏差:公平性漂移作为模型维护与可持续性的新维度
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 May 1;32(5):845-854. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf039.
3
Consecutive prediction of adverse maternal outcomes of preeclampsia, using the PIERS-ML and fullPIERS models: A multicountry prospective observational study.使用PIERS-ML和fullPIERS模型对先兆子痫孕产妇不良结局进行连续预测:一项多国前瞻性观察研究。
PLoS Med. 2025 Feb 4;22(2):e1004509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004509. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
COVID-19 and Rates of Cancer Diagnosis in the US.COVID-19 与美国癌症诊断率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2432288. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32288.
5
Uses and limitations of artificial intelligence for oncology.人工智能在肿瘤学中的应用与局限性。
Cancer. 2024 Jun 15;130(12):2101-2107. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35307. Epub 2024 Mar 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of Electronic Medical Record Follow-Up Data for Estimating the Survival Time of Patients With Cancer.电子病历随访数据对估计癌症患者生存时间的准确性。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2022 Jun;6:e2200019. doi: 10.1200/CCI.22.00019.
2
Proactive vs Reactive Machine Learning in Health Care: Lessons From the COVID-19 Pandemic.医疗保健领域中主动式与反应式机器学习:来自新冠疫情的经验教训
JAMA. 2022 Feb 15;327(7):623-624. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.24935.
3
Quantification of Sepsis Model Alerts in 24 US Hospitals Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.24 家美国医院在 COVID-19 大流行前后对脓毒症模型警报的量化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2135286. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.35286.
4
Efficient and targeted COVID-19 border testing via reinforcement learning.通过强化学习实现高效且有针对性的 COVID-19 边境检测。
Nature. 2021 Nov;599(7883):108-113. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04014-z. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
5
External Validation of a Widely Implemented Proprietary Sepsis Prediction Model in Hospitalized Patients.在住院患者中验证广泛实施的专有脓毒症预测模型的外部有效性。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Aug 1;181(8):1065-1070. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2626.
6
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilisation of healthcare services: a systematic review.2019冠状病毒病大流行对医疗服务利用的影响:一项系统评价
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 16;11(3):e045343. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045343.
7
Effect of Integrating Machine Learning Mortality Estimates With Behavioral Nudges to Clinicians on Serious Illness Conversations Among Patients With Cancer: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.将机器学习死亡率估计与行为提示相结合,为临床医生提供指导,以改善癌症患者的严重疾病沟通:一项 stepped-wedge 聚类随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Dec 1;6(12):e204759. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.4759. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
8
Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict 180-Day Mortality for Outpatients With Cancer.机器学习算法预测癌症门诊患者 180 天死亡率的验证。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Nov 1;6(11):1723-1730. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.4331.
9
Machine Learning Approaches to Predict 6-Month Mortality Among Patients With Cancer.机器学习方法预测癌症患者 6 个月死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1915997. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15997.
10
Evaluation of Mortality Data From the Social Security Administration Death Master File for Clinical Research.利用社会安全管理局死亡主档案评估临床研究中的死亡率数据。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Apr 1;4(4):375-379. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0198.