• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Experiences of Every Mind Matters, Public Health England's adult mental health literacy campaign: a qualitative interview study.每一个思想都很重要:英格兰公共卫生署成人心理健康素养运动的经验:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;23(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15280-z.
2
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
3
Service design for children and young people with common mental health problems: literature review, service mapping and collective case study.儿童和青少年常见心理健康问题的服务设计:文献综述、服务映射和集体案例研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 May;12(13):1-181. doi: 10.3310/DKRT6293.
4
The Resilience Hub approach for addressing mental health of health and social care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods evaluation.应对 COVID-19 大流行期间卫生和社会保健工作者心理健康问题的韧性中心方法:一项混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(29):1-164. doi: 10.3310/HGQR5133.
5
Service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions: reflections of a rapid evaluation team.针对患有多种慢性病患者的服务创新:一个快速评估团队的思考
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jun;12(15):1-76. doi: 10.3310/PTRU7108.
6
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
7
An interactive website to aid young women's choice of contraception: feasibility and efficacy RCT.一个互动网站,帮助年轻女性选择避孕方法:可行性和有效性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(56):1-44. doi: 10.3310/hta24560.
8
Sexual health promotion in people with severe mental illness: the RESPECT feasibility RCT.严重精神疾病患者的性健康促进:尊重可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Dec;23(65):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta23650.
9
The Every Mind Matters campaign: changes in mental health literacy and its associations with campaign awareness.“Every Mind Matters”运动:心理健康素养的变化及其与运动意识的关联。
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Dec 9;33(6):1008-1013. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad145.
10
Lessons from a research partnership in southwest England to understand community palliative care needs in rural, coastal and low-income communities.英格兰西南部一项研究合作项目的经验教训,旨在了解农村、沿海和低收入社区的社区姑息治疗需求。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Feb 28:1-40. doi: 10.3310/ATFA4287.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations of depressive symptoms, social engagement and support, and lifestyle behaviors among non-Hispanic black and Hispanic men with chronic conditions in the United States.美国患有慢性病的非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔男性的抑郁症状、社会参与和支持以及生活方式行为之间的关联。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 16;13:1600818. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1600818. eCollection 2025.
2
Relationship of a public mental health campaign with health service use and association with symptom management knowledge.一项公共心理健康运动与医疗服务利用的关系以及与症状管理知识的关联
BJPsych Open. 2025 May 21;11(3):e112. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2025.55.
3
Factors that affect clinical youth engagement in digital mental health research: a qualitative sub-study nested within a prospective cohort study.影响青少年参与数字心理健康研究的临床因素:一项嵌套在前瞻性队列研究中的定性子研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02571-9.
4
The effect of the 'Every Mind Matters' campaign on mental health literacy: the moderating roles of socioeconomic status and ethnicity.“关注心理健康”运动对心理健康素养的影响:社会经济地位和种族的调节作用。
Eur J Public Health. 2025 Apr 1;35(2):366-372. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaf020.
5
Medical student perceptions of mental illness: a cross-sectional transnational study in two medical schools.医学生对精神疾病的认知:两所医学院校的横断面跨国研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Dec 20;23(1):981. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04962-2.
6
Views on sharing mental health data for research purposes: qualitative analysis of interviews with people with mental illness.对于研究目的共享心理健康数据的看法:对精神病患者访谈的定性分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Nov 14;24(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00961-6.

本文引用的文献

1
The Every Mind Matters campaign: changes in mental health literacy and its associations with campaign awareness.“Every Mind Matters”运动:心理健康素养的变化及其与运动意识的关联。
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Dec 9;33(6):1008-1013. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad145.
2
The association between social class and the impact of treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.社会阶层与心理健康问题治疗效果之间的关联:系统评价和叙述性综合。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2023 Apr;58(4):581-603. doi: 10.1007/s00127-022-02378-9. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
3
Global prevalence of mental health issues among the general population during the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在 2019 冠状病毒病大流行期间普通人群中心理健康问题的全球流行率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 13;11(1):10173. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89700-8.
4
Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population.新冠疫情之前及期间的心理健康状况:一项针对英国人群的纵向概率抽样调查
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;7(10):883-892. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30308-4. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
5
Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data; a case study of codebook development.在定性研究数据的主题分析中尝试严谨性和可重复性;以代码本开发为例。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Mar 28;19(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0707-y.
6
Interventions to reduce stigma towards people with severe mental illness: Systematic review and meta-analysis.减少严重精神疾病患者污名化的干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Aug;103:120-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 May 23.
7
Cost and Outcome of Behavioural Activation versus Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Depression (COBRA): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.抑郁症行为激活与认知行为疗法的成本与结果(COBRA):一项随机对照非劣效性试验
Lancet. 2016 Aug 27;388(10047):871-80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31140-0. Epub 2016 Jul 23.
8
Mental health literacy in secondary schools: a Canadian approach.中学阶段的心理健康素养:一种加拿大的方法。
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2015 Apr;24(2):233-44. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2014.11.007. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
9
The global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980-2013.常见精神障碍的全球患病率:1980 - 2013年的系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;43(2):476-93. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu038. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
10
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.定性研究报告的统一标准(COREQ):访谈和焦点小组的32项清单
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

每一个思想都很重要:英格兰公共卫生署成人心理健康素养运动的经验:一项定性访谈研究。

Experiences of Every Mind Matters, Public Health England's adult mental health literacy campaign: a qualitative interview study.

机构信息

NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, SE5 8AF, London, UK.

NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, W1T 7NF, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;23(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15280-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-023-15280-z
PMID:36849950
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9969361/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Every Mind Matters (EMM) is a publicly funded health campaign, launched in England in 2019, to equip adults to look after their mental health, and that of others, by offering online information about common problems: anxiety, low mood, sleep, and stress. This study is one component of an independent evaluation of EMM conducted by the NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit. Its aim is to explore individuals' experiences of the EMM campaign and website.

METHODS

Four researchers, including three with lived experience of using mental health services, conducted 20, one-off, semi-structured, online interviews with a range of adult participants, including a sample of EMM users and a purposively recruited sub-sample known to have severe or long-term mental health conditions. A codebook thematic analysis was undertaken, and four main themes were identified.

FINDINGS

There was an expectation from the name Every Mind Matters that its advice would address everyone. Almost all participants had experience of mental distress and looked to EMM for help with a current problem for themselves. All participants were complimentary about the EMM website and found it to be user-friendly (theme 1) and personalised (theme 2) especially the interactive feature Your Mind Plan quiz which responds with suggested actions to improve wellbeing and follows up with reminder emails. A few participants found the website information and/or Mind Plan suggestions to be life changing. Some participants wanted EMM to better acknowledge the contexts in which they live (theme 3) such as the limitations of health conditions and health services, and difficulties of crowded housing, social policy, and climate change. Many participants would like EMM to do more (theme 4), offer more interactivity, more choice, more information about available treatments, and more stratified advice to cover more severe mental health conditions.

CONCLUSION

EMM is available to all, including people with common or severe mental disorders. In the context of overwhelmed mental health services, people with severe mental illness expect more from EMM than advice about common problems. EMM could build on its success by extending its remit to address a wider range of needs so that everyone is included.

摘要

背景

“Every Mind Matters (EMM)”是一项由英国公共资金资助的健康运动,于 2019 年在英国推出,旨在通过提供有关常见问题(焦虑、情绪低落、睡眠和压力)的在线信息,帮助成年人照顾自己和他人的心理健康。这项研究是由 NIHR 心理健康政策研究小组对 EMM 进行的独立评估的一部分。其目的是探讨个人对 EMM 运动和网站的体验。

方法

包括 3 名有心理健康服务使用经验的研究人员在内的 4 名研究人员对一系列成年参与者进行了 20 次一次性半结构化在线访谈,参与者包括 EMM 用户样本和一个有严重或长期心理健康状况的有目的招募的亚样本。采用编码主题分析,确定了四个主要主题。

发现

从 Every Mind Matters 的名称可以预期,它的建议将适用于所有人。几乎所有参与者都有过精神困扰的经历,希望通过 EMM 解决自己当前的问题。所有参与者都对 EMM 网站表示赞赏,认为它易于使用(主题 1)和个性化(主题 2),特别是互动功能 Your Mind Plan 测验,它会根据改善幸福感的建议做出回应,并通过提醒电子邮件跟进。一些参与者发现网站信息和/或 Mind Plan 建议具有改变生活的作用。一些参与者希望 EMM 更好地承认他们所处的环境(主题 3),例如健康状况和卫生服务的限制,以及住房拥挤、社会政策和气候变化的困难。许多参与者希望 EMM 做更多的事情(主题 4),提供更多的互动性、更多的选择、更多关于可用治疗方法的信息以及更具分层性的建议,以涵盖更严重的心理健康状况。

结论

EMM 对所有人开放,包括有常见或严重精神障碍的人。在心理健康服务不堪重负的情况下,患有严重精神疾病的人对 EMM 的期望不仅仅是关于常见问题的建议。EMM 可以通过扩大其职权范围来满足更广泛的需求,从而使每个人都能得到包括,从而在此基础上取得成功。