The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
eCentre Clinic, School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 7;10:1051119. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1051119. eCollection 2022.
Employee alcohol and other drug use can negatively impact the workplace, resulting in absenteeism, reduced productivity, high turnover, and worksite safety issues. As the workplace can influence employee substance use through environmental and cultural factors, it also presents a key opportunity to deliver interventions, particularly to employees who may not otherwise seek help. This is a systematic review of workplace-based interventions for the prevention and treatment of problematic substance use. Five databases were searched for efficacy, effectiveness and/or cost-effectiveness studies and reviews published since 2010 that measured use of psychoactive substances (i.e., alcohol, cannabis, hallucinogens, inhalants, opioids, sedatives, hypnotics, anxiolytics, and stimulants) as a primary or secondary outcome, in employees aged over 18. Thirty-nine articles were identified, 28 describing primary research and 11 reviews, most of which focused solely on alcohol use. Heterogeneity between studies with respect to intervention and evaluation design limited the degree to which findings could be synthesized, however, there is some promising evidence for workplace-based universal health promotion interventions, targeted brief interventions, and universal substance use screening. The few studies that examined implementation in the workplace revealed specific barriers including lack of engagement with e-health interventions, heavy use and reluctance to seek help amongst male employees, and confidentiality concerns. Tailoring interventions to each workplace, and ease of implementation and employee engagement emerged as facilitators. Further high-quality research is needed to examine the effectiveness of workplace substance use testing, Employee Assistance Programs, and strategies targeting the use of substances other than alcohol in the workplace.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=227598, PROSPERO [CRD42021227598].
员工的酒精和其他药物使用会对工作场所产生负面影响,导致旷工、生产力下降、人员流动率高和工作场所安全问题。由于工作场所可以通过环境和文化因素影响员工的物质使用,因此它也提供了一个提供干预措施的关键机会,特别是对于那些可能不会寻求帮助的员工。这是一篇关于预防和治疗有问题物质使用的基于工作场所的干预措施的系统评价。自 2010 年以来,五个数据库都在搜索针对功效、有效性和/或成本效益的研究和综述,这些研究和综述测量了使用精神活性物质(即酒精、大麻、迷幻剂、吸入剂、阿片类药物、镇静剂、催眠剂、抗焦虑药和兴奋剂)作为主要或次要结果的情况,研究对象为年龄在 18 岁以上的员工。共确定了 39 篇文章,其中 28 篇描述了主要研究,11 篇综述,大多数研究仅关注酒精使用。由于干预措施和评估设计的异质性,研究结果很难综合,但是,基于工作场所的普遍健康促进干预措施、有针对性的简短干预措施和普遍的物质使用筛查有一些有希望的证据。为数不多的研究检验了在工作场所中的实施情况,发现了具体的障碍,包括电子健康干预措施缺乏参与、男性员工大量使用和不愿意寻求帮助以及保密性问题。干预措施针对每个工作场所进行定制以及易于实施和员工参与度被视为促进因素。还需要进行高质量的研究,以检验工作场所物质使用测试、员工援助计划以及针对工作场所中除酒精以外的物质使用的策略的有效性。
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=227598,PROSPERO [CRD42021227598]。