Suppr超能文献

睡眠对日常生活中侵入性记忆的影响:创伤电影实验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

The effect of sleep on intrusive memories in daily life: a systematic review and meta-analysis of trauma film experiments.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, MA, USA.

出版信息

Sleep. 2023 Feb 8;46(2). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsac280.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To synthesize the literature on the effect of sleep versus wake on the frequency and distress of intrusive memories in everyday life after watching film clips with distressing content as a proxy for traumatic experiences.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review by searching PubMed and PsychInfo. The last search was conducted on January 31, 2022. We included experimental studies comparing sleep and wake groups on intrusions using ecological diary methods, whereas studies lacking a wake control condition or relying solely on intrusion-triggering tasks or retrospective questionnaires were excluded. Meta-analyses were performed to evaluate the results. Risks of biases were assessed following the Cochrane guidelines.

RESULTS

Across 7 effect sizes from 6 independent studies, sleep (n = 192), as compared to wake (n = 175), significantly reduced the number of intrusive memories (Hedges' g = -0.26, p = .04, 95% CI [-0.50, -0.01]), but not the distress associated with them (Hedges' g = -0.14, p = .25, 95% CI [-0.38, 0.10]).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the results suggest that sleep reduces the number of intrusions, there is a strong need for high-powered pre-registered studies to confirm this effect. Risks of biases in the reviewed work concern the selection of the reported results, measurement of the outcome, and failure to adhere to the intervention. Limitations with the current meta-analysis include the small number of studies, which comprised only English-language articles, and the fact that it was not pre-registered.

摘要

研究目的

综合关于观看具有令人痛苦内容的电影片段后,睡眠和清醒对日常生活中侵入性记忆的频率和困扰影响的文献,将其作为创伤经历的替代指标。

方法

我们通过搜索 PubMed 和 PsychInfo 进行了系统评价。最后一次搜索于 2022 年 1 月 31 日进行。我们纳入了使用生态日记方法比较睡眠组和清醒组侵入性记忆的实验研究,而排除了缺乏清醒对照组或仅依赖于侵入性触发任务或回顾性问卷的研究。我们进行了荟萃分析以评估结果。根据 Cochrane 指南评估了偏倚风险。

结果

在 6 项独立研究的 7 个效应量中,与清醒(n=175)相比,睡眠(n=192)显著减少了侵入性记忆的数量(Hedges'g=-0.26,p=0.04,95%置信区间[-0.50,-0.01]),但与它们相关的困扰程度没有差异(Hedges'g=-0.14,p=0.25,95%置信区间[-0.38,0.10])。

结论

尽管结果表明睡眠减少了侵入性记忆的数量,但仍强烈需要高功率的预先注册研究来证实这一效应。综述工作中的偏倚风险涉及报告结果的选择、结果的测量以及未能遵守干预措施。目前荟萃分析的局限性包括研究数量较少,仅包括英语文章,并且没有预先注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0522/9905779/ca80bed53b53/zsac280f0004.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验