• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

股骨大型假体使用的明显趋势:来自国家关节注册中心的分析

Apparent trends in the use of femoral megaprostheses: an analysis from the National Joint Registry.

作者信息

Puttock Darren R, Howard Daniel P, Eastley Nicholas C, Ashford Robert U

机构信息

Leicester Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Arthroplasty. 2022 Dec 1;4(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s42836-022-00150-7.

DOI:10.1186/s42836-022-00150-7
PMID:36451228
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9713154/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Megaprosthetic replacement (MPR) of the femur is typically reserved for salvage or oncological reconstruction. Presently little is known about the provision of femoral MPRs performed nationally, the trends in indications for their use, and their outcomes beyond published unit-level data. Although the National Joint Registry (NJR) collects data as part of a mandatory arthroplasty audit process, MPR data entry on this platform is thought to be inconsistent. The aim of this study is to determine current trends for femoral MPR procedures as submitted to the NJR.

METHODS

Data for all procedures submitted to the NJR using the following implants were extracted: METS (Stanmore/Stryker), MUTARS (Implantcast), Segmental (Zimmer), GMRS (Stryker) and MEGA C (LINK). Pseudoanonymized data were analyzed through the NJR's research Data Access Portal and are reported using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 1781 procedures were identified. Submitted cases increased for primary and revision hip and knee categories over the study period, although they plateaued in recent years. MPR implants were most commonly used in revision hip arthroplasty procedures. MPR use for the management of peri-prosthetic fractures has increased and now represents the most commonly reported indication for MPR use in both hip and knee revision categories. Few centers submitted large MPR case volumes (which were noted to be lower than published unit case series, indicating NJR under-reporting), and the vast majority of centers submitting MPR cases did so in low volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the limitations identified, reported case volumes must be interpreted with caution. An MPR-specific NJR data entry form has been developed to allow more accurate and tailored reporting of MPR procedures, to support specialist service provision, and to provide meaningful data for future research.

摘要

背景

股骨的大假体置换(MPR)通常用于挽救性治疗或肿瘤重建。目前,对于全国范围内进行的股骨MPR的情况、其使用指征的趋势以及已发表的单位层面数据之外的结果了解甚少。尽管国家关节注册中心(NJR)在强制性关节置换审计过程中收集数据,但据认为该平台上MPR数据的录入并不一致。本研究的目的是确定提交给NJR的股骨MPR手术的当前趋势。

方法

提取使用以下植入物提交给NJR的所有手术的数据:METS(斯坦莫尔/史赛克)、MUTARS(英普拉斯)、节段型( Zimmer)、GMRS(史赛克)和MEGA C(LINK)。通过NJR的研究数据访问门户对去识别化数据进行分析,并使用描述性统计进行报告。

结果

共识别出1781例手术。在研究期间,初次和翻修髋关节及膝关节类别的提交病例有所增加,尽管近年来趋于平稳。MPR植入物最常用于翻修髋关节置换手术。MPR用于治疗假体周围骨折的情况有所增加,现在是髋关节和膝关节翻修类别中MPR使用最常报告的指征。很少有中心提交大量MPR病例(注意到这些病例数低于已发表的单位病例系列,表明NJR报告不足),提交MPR病例的绝大多数中心提交的病例数较少。

结论

由于存在已识别的局限性,对报告的病例数必须谨慎解读。已开发了一份特定于MPR的NJR数据录入表格,以允许更准确和有针对性地报告MPR手术,支持专科服务的提供,并为未来研究提供有意义的数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b2/9714220/9fc155a80b5c/42836_2022_150_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b2/9714220/8618511ee236/42836_2022_150_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b2/9714220/fd0c7b5553d5/42836_2022_150_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b2/9714220/8966ab1db89a/42836_2022_150_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b2/9714220/1a6ff37521b7/42836_2022_150_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b2/9714220/9b30be912735/42836_2022_150_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b2/9714220/69bb17f3aead/42836_2022_150_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b2/9714220/33662908a4a5/42836_2022_150_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b2/9714220/689eeb1d8ade/42836_2022_150_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b2/9714220/ef4610847152/42836_2022_150_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b2/9714220/bf2fcace78c6/42836_2022_150_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b2/9714220/9fc155a80b5c/42836_2022_150_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b2/9714220/8618511ee236/42836_2022_150_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b2/9714220/fd0c7b5553d5/42836_2022_150_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b2/9714220/8966ab1db89a/42836_2022_150_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b2/9714220/1a6ff37521b7/42836_2022_150_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b2/9714220/9b30be912735/42836_2022_150_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b2/9714220/69bb17f3aead/42836_2022_150_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b2/9714220/33662908a4a5/42836_2022_150_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b2/9714220/689eeb1d8ade/42836_2022_150_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b2/9714220/ef4610847152/42836_2022_150_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b2/9714220/bf2fcace78c6/42836_2022_150_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b2/9714220/9fc155a80b5c/42836_2022_150_Fig11_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Apparent trends in the use of femoral megaprostheses: an analysis from the National Joint Registry.股骨大型假体使用的明显趋势:来自国家关节注册中心的分析
Arthroplasty. 2022 Dec 1;4(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s42836-022-00150-7.
2
Validation of revision data for total hip and knee replacements undertaken at a high volume orthopaedic centre against data held on the National Joint Registry.验证在高容量骨科中心进行的全髋关节和膝关节置换术的修订数据与国家关节登记处的数据相符。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Oct 10;14(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1304-9.
3
Are all metal-on-metal hip revision operations contributing to the National Joint Registry implant survival curves? : a study comparing the London Implant Retrieval Centre and National Joint Registry datasets.所有金属对金属髋关节翻修手术都对国家关节注册中心的植入物存活曲线有贡献吗?:一项比较伦敦植入物取出中心和国家关节注册中心数据集的研究。
Bone Joint J. 2016 Jan;98-B(1):33-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B1.36431.
4
Non-neoplastic indications and outcomes of the proximal and distal femur megaprosthesis: a critical review.股骨近端和远端大型假体的非肿瘤性适应症及结果:一项批判性综述
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2020 Apr 9;32(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s43019-020-00034-7.
5
Validation of primary metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties on the National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland using data from the London Implant Retrieval Centre: a study using the NJR dataset.利用伦敦植入物取出中心的数据,对英格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰国家关节注册中心的初次金属对金属髋关节置换术进行验证:一项使用国家关节注册中心数据集的研究
Bone Joint J. 2015 Jan;97-B(1):10-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B1.35279.
6
Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched Study.金属对金属髋关节翻修手术后的结果取决于失败原因:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):245-258. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000029.
7
Revision for prosthetic joint infection following hip arthroplasty: Evidence from the National Joint Registry.髋关节置换术后人工关节感染的翻修:来自国家关节注册中心的证据。
Bone Joint Res. 2017 Jun;6(6):391-398. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.66.BJR-2017-0003.R1.
8
Conventional Versus Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Primary Total Knee Replacement: A Comparison of Revision Rates Using Data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, and Northern Ireland.常规交联聚乙烯与高交联聚乙烯在初次全膝关节置换中的应用:来自英格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰国家联合登记处数据的翻修率比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Jan 15;102(2):119-127. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00031.
9
Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.对于65岁以下男性,伯明翰髋关节表面置换术的生存率是否优于某些传统髋关节置换术?来自澳大利亚骨科协会国家关节置换登记处的一项研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Nov;478(11):2625-2636. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001453.
10

引用本文的文献

1
A biosynthetic thumb prosthesis.一种生物合成拇指假体。
NPJ Biomed Innov. 2025;2(1):22. doi: 10.1038/s44385-025-00031-z. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
2
Distal Femur Megaprostheses in Orthopedic Oncology: Evaluation of a Standardized Post-Operative Rehabilitation Protocol.骨科肿瘤学中的股骨远端大假体:标准化术后康复方案的评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Nov 19;11(22):2984. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11222984.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery - A Systematic Review of the Current Literature.Covid-19 大流行对矫形和创伤外科的影响 - 当前文献的系统评价。
In Vivo. 2021 May-Jun;35(3):1337-1343. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12386. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
2
Provision of revision knee surgery and calculation of the effect of a network service reconfiguration: An analysis from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.提供膝关节翻修手术,并计算网络服务重新配置的效果:来自英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家联合登记处的分析。
Knee. 2020 Oct;27(5):1593-1600. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.07.094. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
3
Orthopaedic registries - the UK view (National Joint Registry): impact on practice.
骨科注册系统——英国视角(国家关节注册系统):对临床实践的影响
EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Jun 3;4(6):377-390. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180084. eCollection 2019 Jun.
4
Is endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal femur appropriate in the comorbid patient?对于合并其他疾病的患者,股骨近端的人工关节置换是否合适?
Hip Int. 2018 Jan;28(1):68-73. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000520.
5
Megaprosthesis of the knee in tumor and revision surgery.膝关节肿瘤及翻修手术中的大型假体
Acta Biomed. 2017 Jun 7;88(2S):129-138. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6523.
6
The stability of the hip after the use of a proximal femoral endoprosthesis for oncological indications: analysis of variables relating to the patient and the surgical technique.用于肿瘤适应症的股骨近端假体植入后髋关节的稳定性:与患者和手术技术相关变量的分析。
Bone Joint J. 2017 Apr;99-B(4):531-537. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B4.BJJ-2016-0960.R1.
7
Modular Endoprostheses for Nonneoplastic Conditions: Midterm Complications and Survival.用于非肿瘤性疾病的模块化内置假体:中期并发症及生存率
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:2606521. doi: 10.1155/2016/2606521. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
8
Very long-term outcomes after endoprosthetic replacement for malignant tumours of bone.骨恶性肿瘤人工关节置换术后的超长期疗效
Bone Joint J. 2016 Jun;98-B(6):857-64. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B6.37417.
9
The use of megaprostheses for reconstruction of large skeletal defects in the extremities: a critical review.用于四肢大骨缺损重建的大型假体:一项批判性综述。
Open Orthop J. 2014 Oct 17;8:384-9. doi: 10.2174/1874325001408010384. eCollection 2014.
10
Systematic review of proximal femoral arthroplasty for non-neoplastic conditions.非肿瘤性疾病的股骨近端关节成形术系统评价
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Nov;29(11):2117-21. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.06.012. Epub 2014 Jun 21.