Department of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
J Nutr Sci. 2022 Nov 24;11:e105. doi: 10.1017/jns.2022.102. eCollection 2022.
We evaluated the accuracy of the estimated serving size using digital photographs in a newly developed food atlas. From 209 food items in the food atlas, we selected 14 items with various appearances for evaluation. At the study site, fifty-four participants aged 18-33 years were served fourteen foods in the amount they usually ate. After they left, each food item was weighed by a researcher. The following day, the participants estimated the quantity of each food they served based on food photographs using a web-based questionnaire. We compared the weights of the foods the participants served (true serving sizes) and those determined based on the photographs (estimated serving sizes). For ten of the fourteen food items, significant differences were observed between the estimated and true serving sizes, ranging from a 29⋅8 % underestimation (curry sauce) to a 34⋅0 % overestimation (margarine). On average, the relative difference was 8⋅8 %. Overall, 51⋅6 % of the participants were within ±25 % of the true serving size, 81⋅9 % were within ±50 % and 93⋅4 % were within ±75 %. Bland-Altman plots showed wide limits of agreement and increased variances with larger serving sizes for most food items. Overall, no association was found between estimation errors and participant characteristics. The food atlas has shown potential for assessment of portion size estimation. Further development, refinement and testing are needed to improve the usefulness of the digital food photographic atlas as a portion size estimation aid.
我们评估了新开发的食物图谱中使用数字照片估计份量的准确性。从食物图谱中的 209 种食物中,我们选择了 14 种外观各异的食物进行评估。在研究现场,54 名年龄在 18-33 岁的参与者摄入了他们通常食用量的 14 种食物。他们离开后,由一名研究人员对每种食物进行称重。第二天,参与者根据基于食物照片的网络问卷来估计他们所提供的每种食物的数量。我们比较了参与者所提供的食物的重量(真实份量)和基于照片确定的份量(估计份量)。对于 14 种食物中的 10 种,估计和真实份量之间存在显著差异,范围从 29.8%的低估(咖喱酱)到 34.0%的高估(人造黄油)。平均而言,相对差异为 8.8%。总体而言,51.6%的参与者的真实份量在±25%以内,81.9%的参与者在±50%以内,93.4%的参与者在±75%以内。Bland-Altman 图显示,对于大多数食物,协议范围较宽,且随着份量的增加,方差也增加。总体而言,估计误差与参与者特征之间没有关联。食物图谱在评估份量估计方面显示出潜力。需要进一步开发、改进和测试,以提高数字食物照片图谱作为份量估计辅助工具的实用性。