Scanlon Brighid, Roberts Natasha, Wyld David, Toloo Ghasem Sam, Durham Jo
Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Cancer Care Services, Herston, Australia.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 May 16. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02477-8.
Cancer inequities for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) populations have been demonstrated in Australia. Historically, research has focused on individual factors, but addressing structural and institutional determinants is crucial for equitable care provision. This study utilised Critical Race Theory to examine institutional factors impacting equitable care provision.
We undertook a qualitative exploration of a large tertiary hospital in metropolitan Queensland. Institutional barriers, facilitators, and staff experiences regarding equitable care were explored through semi-structured interviews (n = 21). Participants included oncology registered nurses (n = 6), oncology doctors (n = 5), specialist nurses (n = 7), and executive-level staff (n = 3). Data were analysed using The Framework Method.
Findings revealed an inflexible health system with strong deficit framing of CALD patients. A reliance on assumptions and informal mechanisms to address the needs of CALD patients resulted in suboptimal practises such as simplified information sharing, use of unqualified interpreters, limited treatment access, and avoidance of psycho-social discussions. Staff reported experiencing moral conflict when providing care discordant with their professional values.
This study demonstrates the need for cultural and structural reform within Australian health services. Adapting services to promote equity will have demonstrable benefits for patient outcomes, quality of care, and staff wellbeing.
澳大利亚已证明文化和语言多样化(CALD)人群存在癌症治疗不平等现象。历史上,研究主要集中在个体因素上,但解决结构性和制度性决定因素对于公平提供医疗服务至关重要。本研究运用批判种族理论来审视影响公平医疗服务提供的制度因素。
我们对昆士兰州首府的一家大型三级医院进行了定性探索。通过半结构化访谈(n = 21)探讨了公平医疗方面的制度障碍、促进因素和员工经历。参与者包括肿瘤专科注册护士(n = 6)、肿瘤医生(n = 5)、专科护士(n = 7)和行政级员工(n = 3)。使用框架法对数据进行了分析。
研究结果显示,卫生系统缺乏灵活性,对CALD患者存在严重的缺陷性认知。依赖假设和非正式机制来满足CALD患者的需求导致了一些不理想的做法,如简化信息共享、使用不合格的口译员、有限的治疗机会以及避免进行心理社会讨论。员工报告称,在提供与他们的职业价值观不符的护理时会经历道德冲突。
本研究表明澳大利亚卫生服务需要进行文化和结构改革。调整服务以促进公平将对患者治疗结果、护理质量和员工福祉产生明显益处。