• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

碳排放交易政策对降低中国 PM 浓度的减排效果。

Reduction Effect of Carbon Emission Trading Policy in Decreasing PM Concentrations in China.

机构信息

Institute of Circular Economy, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.

Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning, Beijing 100045, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 3;19(23):16208. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316208.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph192316208
PMID:36498281
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9738372/
Abstract

Carbon emissions trading is a market-based tool for solving environmental issues. This study used a difference-in-differences (DID) approach to estimate China's carbon trading pilots to reduce PM concentrations. The results of this quasi-natural experiment show that the carbon trading policy effectively reduces PM by 2.7 μg/m. We used a propensity score matching (PSM-DID) method to minimize selection bias to construct a treatment and a control group. The results show the policy effect is robust, with a PM concentration reduction of 2.6 μg/m. Furthermore, we employed a series of robustness checks to support our findings, which notably indicate that the effect of carbon trading on reducing PM differs across regions over the years. The western region of China tends to be the most easily affected region, and the early years of carbon trading show slightly greater reduction effects. Our findings provide valuable policy implications for establishing and promoting carbon trading in China and other countries.

摘要

碳排放交易是解决环境问题的一种基于市场的工具。本研究采用双重差分法(DID)估计中国碳交易试点对降低 PM 浓度的影响。准自然实验的结果表明,碳交易政策能有效降低 2.7μg/m 的 PM。我们使用倾向得分匹配(PSM-DID)方法来最小化选择偏差,构建处理组和对照组。结果表明政策效果稳健,能降低 2.6μg/m 的 PM 浓度。此外,我们进行了一系列稳健性检验来支持研究结果,特别表明碳交易对降低 PM 的影响因地区和年份而异。中国西部地区往往是最容易受到影响的地区,碳交易的早期阶段显示出略微更大的减排效果。我们的研究结果为中国和其他国家建立和推广碳交易提供了有价值的政策启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa5f/9738372/65e0e525ef4a/ijerph-19-16208-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa5f/9738372/47edef02c11f/ijerph-19-16208-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa5f/9738372/400baff6e60c/ijerph-19-16208-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa5f/9738372/65e0e525ef4a/ijerph-19-16208-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa5f/9738372/47edef02c11f/ijerph-19-16208-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa5f/9738372/400baff6e60c/ijerph-19-16208-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa5f/9738372/65e0e525ef4a/ijerph-19-16208-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Reduction Effect of Carbon Emission Trading Policy in Decreasing PM Concentrations in China.碳排放交易政策对降低中国 PM 浓度的减排效果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 3;19(23):16208. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316208.
2
Governance effects of pollution reduction and carbon mitigation of carbon emission trading policy in China.中国碳排放交易政策在减少污染和碳减排方面的治理效应。
Environ Res. 2024 Jul 1;252(Pt 4):119074. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119074. Epub 2024 May 4.
3
Market incentives, carbon quota allocation and carbon emission reduction: Evidence from China's carbon trading pilot policy.市场激励、碳配额分配与碳排放减排:来自中国碳交易试点政策的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Oct 1;319:115650. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115650. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
4
Is Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) an Effective Market-Incentivized Environmental Regulation Policy? Evidence from China's Eight ETS Pilots.碳排放交易体系(ETS)是一种有效的市场激励型环境监管政策吗?来自中国八个碳排放交易试点的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 8;19(6):3177. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063177.
5
Has Carbon Emissions Trading Reduced PM in China?碳排放交易是否减少了中国的 PM 污染?
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 May 18;55(10):6631-6643. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c00248. Epub 2021 May 7.
6
Impact on Carbon Intensity of Carbon Emission Trading-Evidence from a Pilot Program in 281 Cities in China.中国 281 个城市碳交易试点对碳强度的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 30;19(19):12483. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912483.
7
Can carbon emission trading improve carbon emission performance? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China.碳排放交易能否改善碳排放绩效?来自中国准自然实验的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Dec;30(59):124028-124040. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31060-z. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
8
Evaluation of carbon emission reduction effect and porter effect of China's carbon trading policy.中国碳交易政策的碳排放减少效应与波特效应评估
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(16):46527-46546. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25593-6. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
9
Can China's Carbon Emissions Trading System Achieve the Synergistic Effect of Carbon Reduction and Pollution Control?中国碳排放权交易体系能否实现碳减排与污染控制协同效应?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 22;19(15):8932. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19158932.
10
The effect of China's carbon emission trading on eco-efficiency: an empirical study at the city level.中国碳排放交易对生态效率的影响:基于城市层面的实证研究
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Dec;29(56):84827-84843. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21617-9. Epub 2022 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Dual Carbon Goal-Based Quadrilateral Evolutionary Game: Study on the New Energy Vehicle Industry in China.基于双碳目标的四边形演化博弈:中国新能源汽车产业研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 12;20(4):3217. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043217.

本文引用的文献

1
Market incentives, carbon quota allocation and carbon emission reduction: Evidence from China's carbon trading pilot policy.市场激励、碳配额分配与碳排放减排:来自中国碳交易试点政策的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Oct 1;319:115650. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115650. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
2
Is Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) an Effective Market-Incentivized Environmental Regulation Policy? Evidence from China's Eight ETS Pilots.碳排放交易体系(ETS)是一种有效的市场激励型环境监管政策吗?来自中国八个碳排放交易试点的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 8;19(6):3177. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063177.
3
Effect of cleaner residential heating policy on air pollution: A case study in Shandong Province, China.
清洁型住宅供暖政策对空气污染的影响:以中国山东省为例
J Environ Manage. 2022 Mar 7;311:114847. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114847.
4
The effectiveness of China's regional carbon market pilots in reducing firm emissions.中国区域碳市场试点对企业减排的有效性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 28;118(52). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2109912118.
5
A multi-factor integrated model for carbon price forecasting: Market interaction promoting carbon emission reduction.多因素综合模型预测碳价格:市场互动促进碳减排。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 20;796:149110. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149110. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
6
Has Carbon Emissions Trading Reduced PM in China?碳排放交易是否减少了中国的 PM 污染?
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 May 18;55(10):6631-6643. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c00248. Epub 2021 May 7.
7
The effectiveness and heterogeneity of carbon emissions trading scheme in China.中国碳排放交易计划的有效性和异质性。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Apr;28(14):17306-17318. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-12182-0. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
8
Assessing the impact of ETS trading profit on emission abatements based on firm-level transactions.基于企业层面交易评估 ETS 交易利润对减排的影响。
Nat Commun. 2020 Apr 29;11(1):2078. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15996-1.
9
The European Union Emissions Trading System reduced CO emissions despite low prices.欧盟排放交易体系在价格较低的情况下减少了 CO 排放。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 21;117(16):8804-8812. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1918128117. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
10
How does emission trading reduce China's carbon intensity? An exploration using a decomposition and difference-in-differences approach.排放交易如何降低中国的碳强度?基于分解法和双重差分法的探究
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Aug 1;676:514-523. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.303. Epub 2019 Apr 23.