Univ. Angers, CHU Angers, Univ. Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail)-UMRS 1085, SFR ICAT, 49100 Angers, France.
CNRS, LAREMA, SFR MATHSTIC, Université d'Angers, 49100 Angers, France.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 4;19(23):16217. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316217.
Musculoskeletal disorders related to work might be caused by the cumulative effect of occupational exposures during working life. We aimed to develop a new model which allows to compare the accuracy of duration of work and intensity/frequency associations in application to severe knee pain.
From the CONSTANCES cohort, 62,620 subjects who were working at inclusion and coded were included in the study. The biomechanical job exposure matrix "JEM Constances" was used to assess the intensity/frequency of heavy lifting and kneeling/squatting at work together with work history to characterize the association between occupational exposure and severe knee pain. An innovative model G was developed and evaluated, allowing to compare the accuracy of duration of work and intensity/frequency associations.
The mean age was 49 years at inception with 46 percent of women. The G model developed was slightly better than regular models. Among the men subgroup, odds ratios of the highest quartile for the duration and low intensity were not significant for both exposures, whereas intensity/duration were for every duration. Results in women were less interpretable.
Though higher duration increased strength of association with severe knee pain, intensity/frequency were important predictors among men. Exposure estimation along working history should have emphasis on such parameters, though other outcomes should be studied and have a focus on women.
与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病可能是由于工作生涯中职业暴露的累积效应引起的。我们旨在开发一种新的模型,该模型可以比较工作持续时间和强度/频率关联的准确性,以应用于严重的膝关节疼痛。
从 CONSTANCES 队列中,纳入了 62620 名在纳入时正在工作且被编码的受试者。使用生物力学工作暴露矩阵“JEM Constances”评估了工作中重负荷和跪地/蹲姿的强度/频率,以及工作史,以表征职业暴露与严重膝关节疼痛之间的关联。开发并评估了一种创新模型 G,允许比较工作持续时间和强度/频率关联的准确性。
起始时的平均年龄为 49 岁,女性占 46%。开发的 G 模型略优于常规模型。在男性亚组中,对于两种暴露,最高四分位的持续时间和低强度的比值对于两种暴露都没有显著意义,而强度/持续时间则对于每个持续时间都有意义。女性的结果更难以解释。
尽管较高的持续时间增加了与严重膝关节疼痛的关联强度,但强度/频率是男性的重要预测因素。沿工作史的暴露评估应重点关注这些参数,尽管应研究其他结果并关注女性。