EpicentRx Torrey Pines California, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 28;23(23):14905. doi: 10.3390/ijms232314905.
In medicine, inflammation is a fuzzy, overused word first coined by the Romans, the intended meaning and precise definition of which varies according to the person and the clinical context. It tends to carry a negative connotation as a response gone awry, like a raging, out-of-control wildfire that requires immediate control and containment lest it destroy all in its path; however, frequently overlooked or lost in the shuffle is the primordial importance of inflammation to health and survival. The precise definition of inflammation matters for several reasons, not least because of the over-liberal use of anti-inflammatory drugs to inhibit inflammation, which may, contrary to prevailing dogma that all inflammation is harmful, act counterproductively to prevent restitutio ad integrum. Using fire as a central analogy, this overview attempts to define inflammation, the better to determine how to manage it, i.e., whether to fan its flames, let it burn out, or suppress it entirely.
在医学领域,炎症是一个模糊且被过度使用的词汇,最早由罗马人创造,其含义和确切定义因人和临床背景而异。它往往带有负面含义,被视为一种失控的反应,就像一场失控的野火,需要立即控制和遏制,以免它摧毁所经之处的一切;然而,人们常常忽视或忽略了炎症对健康和生存的原始重要性。炎症的确切定义很重要,原因有几个,不仅因为抗炎药物的过度使用会抑制炎症,这可能与普遍的观点相悖,即所有炎症都是有害的,反而会适得其反,妨碍组织修复。本文采用火灾作为核心类比,试图定义炎症,以便更好地确定如何治疗炎症,即是否助长其火势、任其燃烧殆尽,还是完全抑制炎症。