Suppr超能文献

血流限制在神经系统疾病中的有效性:一项系统综述。

Effectiveness of Blood Flow Restriction in Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Vinolo-Gil Maria Jesus, Rodríguez-Huguet Manuel, Martin-Vega Francisco Javier, Garcia-Munoz Cristina, Lagares-Franco Carolina, Garcia-Campanario Ismael

机构信息

Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cadiz, 11009 Cadiz, Spain.

Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation of Cádiz, 11009 Cadiz, Spain.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 30;10(12):2407. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122407.

Abstract

There is scientific evidence that Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) is beneficial in healthy people, the elderly and patients with musculoskeletal disorders. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of BFR in patients with neurological disorders. The literature search was conducted up until July 2022 in the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), LILACS, Scopus, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Literature Complete (CINAHL), the Cochrane Library and Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO). The PEDro scale was used to analyze the methodological quality of the studies, and the Cochrane Collaboration's tool was employed to evaluate the risk of bias. A total of seven articles were included. BFR seems to be beneficial in neurological disorders. Improvements have been found in sensorimotor function, frequency and step length symmetry, perceived exertion, heart rate and gait speed, walking endurance, fatigue, quality of life, muscles thickness, gluteus density and muscle edema. No improvements were found in lower limb strength or balance. However, results must be taken with caution due to the small number of articles and to the large heterogeneity. More clinical trials are needed. These studies should homogenize the protocols used in larger samples, as well as improve their methodological quality.

摘要

有科学证据表明,血流限制(BFR)对健康人群、老年人以及肌肉骨骼疾病患者有益。本研究进行了一项系统评价,以评估BFR对神经疾病患者的有效性。检索文献截至2022年7月,检索数据库如下:PubMed、科学引文索引(WOS)、物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)、拉丁美洲和加勒比卫生科学文献数据库(LILACS)、Scopus数据库、护理学与健康照护领域累积索引数据库(CINAHL)、Cochrane图书馆以及科学电子图书馆在线数据库(SciELO)。采用PEDro量表分析研究的方法学质量,并使用Cochrane协作网工具评估偏倚风险。共纳入7篇文章。BFR似乎对神经疾病有益。在感觉运动功能、频率和步长对称性、主观用力程度、心率和步态速度、步行耐力、疲劳、生活质量、肌肉厚度、臀肌密度和肌肉水肿方面均有改善。在下肢力量或平衡方面未发现改善。然而,由于文章数量较少且异质性较大,结果必须谨慎对待。需要更多的临床试验。这些研究应使更大样本中使用的方案同质化,并提高其方法学质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d18/9778162/cef05d7f1814/healthcare-10-02407-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验