• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知策略:调节执行功能与日常功能之间的关系。

Cognitive Strategies: Moderating the Relationship between Executive Functions and Daily Functioning.

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 15;19(24):16845. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416845.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph192416845
PMID:36554722
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9778739/
Abstract

Whereas prior studies have addressed relationships between cognitive strategies and learning and achievement, very few dealt with their connection to daily functioning. This study examines the moderation effect of the frequency of compensatory cognitive strategy use within that relationship among university students. A sample of 336 students (18-36 years; 180 women, 156 men) answered the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX; executive function components), Time Organization and Participation Scale (TOPS; daily functioning), and Compensatory Cognitive Strategies Scale (CCSS; strategy use). The results showed significant correlations between the DEX and TOPS for three CCSS levels (-1.0, -1.0 to 1.0, and 1.0 SD from average); the higher the frequency of cognitive strategy use, the stronger the association between the DEX and TOPS. The findings suggest that more frequently use of cognitive strategies can strengthen efficient daily functioning.

摘要

虽然先前的研究已经探讨了认知策略与学习和成就之间的关系,但很少有研究涉及它们与日常功能的联系。本研究考察了大学生群体中,补偿性认知策略使用频率在这种关系中的调节作用。一项由 336 名学生(18-36 岁;180 名女性,156 名男性)组成的样本回答了执行功能问卷(DEX;执行功能成分)、时间组织和参与量表(TOPS;日常功能)以及补偿性认知策略量表(CCSS;策略使用)。结果表明,DEX 与 CCSS 的三个水平(-1.0、-1.0 到 1.0 和平均标准差 1.0)之间存在显著相关性;认知策略使用频率越高,DEX 和 TOPS 之间的关联越强。研究结果表明,更频繁地使用认知策略可以增强日常功能的效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b395/9778739/dd54960a6123/ijerph-19-16845-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b395/9778739/e3579527c968/ijerph-19-16845-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b395/9778739/dd54960a6123/ijerph-19-16845-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b395/9778739/e3579527c968/ijerph-19-16845-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b395/9778739/dd54960a6123/ijerph-19-16845-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Cognitive Strategies: Moderating the Relationship between Executive Functions and Daily Functioning.认知策略:调节执行功能与日常功能之间的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 15;19(24):16845. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416845.
2
Self-assessment of executive function and lateralization of brain pathology: What does the DEX-S profile show?
Psychiatr Pol. 2019 Feb 28;53(1):129-143. doi: 10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/85936.
3
The impact of multimodal cognitive rehabilitation on executive functions in older adults with traumatic brain injury.多模态认知康复对创伤性脑损伤老年患者执行功能的影响。
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Sep;64(5):101559. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101559. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
4
Long-term cognitive disability after traumatic brain injury: Contribution of the DEX relative questionnaires.颅脑创伤后长期认知障碍:DEX 相对问卷的作用。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020 Dec;30(10):1905-1924. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2019.1618345. Epub 2019 May 22.
5
Why are they late? Timing abilities and executive control among students with learning disabilities.他们为什么迟到?学习障碍学生的时间感知能力与执行控制能力
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Dec;59:105-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.07.012. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
6
Behavioral dysexecutive symptoms in normal aging.正常衰老过程中的行为执行功能障碍症状
Brain Cogn. 2003 Nov;53(2):129-32. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2626(03)00094-0.
7
Validity of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX). Ratings by patients with brain injury and their therapists.执行功能障碍问卷(DEX)的效度。脑损伤患者及其治疗师的评分。
Brain Inj. 2014;28(12):1581-9. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.942371. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
8
The Everyday Compensation (EComp) Questionnaire: Construct Validity and Associations with Diagnosis and Longitudinal Change in Cognition and Everyday Function in Older Adults.日常补偿问卷(EComp):在老年人中与认知和日常功能的诊断和纵向变化相关的结构效度。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2020 Mar;26(3):303-313. doi: 10.1017/S135561771900119X. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
9
[DEX and executive dysfunction in activities of daily living in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia].[右美托咪定与阿尔茨海默病和额颞叶痴呆日常生活活动中的执行功能障碍]
Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2010 Sep;8(3):215-24; quiz 225-7. doi: 10.1684/pnv.2010.0220.
10
Two types of impairments in OCD: obsessions, as problems of thought suppression; compulsions, as behavioral-executive impairment.强迫症的两种障碍:强迫观念,作为思维抑制的问题;强迫行为,作为行为执行障碍。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Mar 30;215(3):651-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.11.014. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Children's executive functions predict their preferences for emotion regulation strategies.儿童的执行功能可预测他们对情绪调节策略的偏好。
Cogn Emot. 2024 Dec 6:1-17. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2024.2438078.
2
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the 10-item Weekly Calendar Planning Activity in Spanish-speaking ABI patients: a multicenter study.西班牙语失语症患者10项每周日程规划活动的翻译、跨文化调适及效度验证:一项多中心研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 13;14:1018055. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1018055. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Alcohol use problems and conflict among couples: A preliminary investigation of the moderating effects of maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies.酒精使用问题与夫妻间冲突:对适应不良认知情绪调节策略调节作用的初步调查。
Couple Family Psychol. 2022 Dec;11(4):290-299. doi: 10.1037/cfp0000160. Epub 2021 May 6.
2
Promoting Effective Self-Management of the Gluten-Free Diet: Children's and Adolescents' Self-Generated Do's and Don'ts.促进 gluten-free 饮食的有效自我管理:儿童和青少年自我生成的应该做和不应该做的事情。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 28;19(21):14051. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114051.
3
Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process-Fourth Edition.
《作业治疗实践框架:领域与过程》第四版。
Am J Occup Ther. 2020 Aug 1;74(Supplement_2):7412410010p1-7412410010p87. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2020.74S2001.
4
Time Organization Patterns of Adolescents: Agreement between Self- Report and Parent Report.青少年的时间组织模式:自我报告与父母报告的一致性。
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2022;42(3):319-332. doi: 10.1080/01942638.2021.1982839. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
5
Compensatory Cognitive Strategy Use by Young Adults: A Psychometric Evaluation of Self-Report Measures.年轻人使用的补偿性认知策略:自我报告测量的心理测量评估
Assessment. 2022 Apr;29(3):441-454. doi: 10.1177/1073191120981769. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
6
Executive functions.执行功能。
Handb Clin Neurol. 2020;173:225-240. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64150-2.00020-4.
7
Applied cognitive strategy behaviours in people with parkinson's disease during daily activities: A cross-sectional study.
J Rehabil Med. 2019 Dec 10;52(1):jrm00010. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2635.
8
Cognitive function following a major depressive episode: a systematic review and meta-analysis.重度抑郁发作后的认知功能:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;6(10):851-861. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30291-3. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
9
Academic accommodation strategies for pharmacy students with learning disabilities: What else can be done?针对有学习障碍的药学专业学生的学术适应策略:还能做些什么?
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019 Aug;11(8):751-756. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
10
Job Insecurity and Mental Health: The Moderating Role of Coping Strategies From a Gender Perspective.工作不安全感与心理健康:从性别视角看应对策略的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 18;10:286. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00286. eCollection 2019.