• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

各种单一菌株和多菌株益生菌、膳食补充剂或其他有益微生物对常见临床伤口病原体的抗菌作用。

The Antimicrobial Effect of Various Single-Strain and Multi-Strain Probiotics, Dietary Supplements or Other Beneficial Microbes against Common Clinical Wound Pathogens.

作者信息

Fijan Sabina, Kocbek Primož, Steyer Andrej, Vodičar Polona Maver, Strauss Maja

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maribor, Žitna ulica 15, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.

Environment and Food, Division of Public Health Microbiology, National Laboratory of Health, Grablovičeva 44, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Microorganisms. 2022 Dec 19;10(12):2518. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10122518.

DOI:10.3390/microorganisms10122518
PMID:36557771
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9781324/
Abstract

The skin is the largest organ in the human body and is colonized by a diverse microbiota that works in harmony to protect the skin. However, when skin damage occurs, the skin microbiota is also disrupted, and pathogens can invade the wound and cause infection. Probiotics or other beneficial microbes and their metabolites are one possible alternative treatment for combating skin pathogens via their antimicrobial effectiveness. The objective of our study was to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of seven multi-strain dietary supplements and eleven single-strain microbes that contain probiotics against 15 clinical wound pathogens using the agar spot assay, co-culturing assay, and agar well diffusion assay. We also conducted genera-specific and species-specific molecular methods to detect the DNA in the dietary supplements and single-strain beneficial microbes. We found that the multi-strain dietary supplements exhibited a statistically significant higher antagonistic effect against the challenge wound pathogens than the single-strain microbes and that lactobacilli-containing dietary supplements and single-strain microbes were significantly more efficient than the selected propionibacteria and bacilli. Differences in results between methods were also observed, possibly due to different mechanisms of action. Individual pathogens were susceptible to different dietary supplements or single-strain microbes. Perhaps an individual approach such as a 'probiogram' could be a possibility in the future as a method to find the most efficient targeted probiotic strains, cell-free supernatants, or neutralized cell-free supernatants that have the highest antagonistic effect against individual clinical wound pathogens.

摘要

皮肤是人体最大的器官,其上定殖着多种多样的微生物群,它们协同发挥作用以保护皮肤。然而,当皮肤受损时,皮肤微生物群也会被破坏,病原体可能侵入伤口并引发感染。益生菌或其他有益微生物及其代谢产物是通过其抗菌作用对抗皮肤病原体的一种可能的替代治疗方法。我们研究的目的是使用琼脂斑点试验、共培养试验和琼脂孔扩散试验,评估七种含有益生菌的多菌株膳食补充剂和十一种单菌株微生物对15种临床伤口病原体的抗菌效果。我们还采用属特异性和种特异性分子方法来检测膳食补充剂和单菌株有益微生物中的DNA。我们发现,多菌株膳食补充剂对受试伤口病原体的拮抗作用在统计学上显著高于单菌株微生物,并且含乳酸杆菌的膳食补充剂和单菌株微生物比选定的丙酸杆菌和芽孢杆菌显著更有效。还观察到不同方法之间结果存在差异,这可能是由于作用机制不同。个别病原体对不同的膳食补充剂或单菌株微生物敏感。也许将来可以采用一种个体化方法,比如“益生菌谱”,作为一种找到对个别临床伤口病原体具有最高拮抗作用的最有效的靶向益生菌菌株、无细胞上清液或中和的无细胞上清液的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb5/9781324/485c59e9241c/microorganisms-10-02518-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb5/9781324/55105b8b43b4/microorganisms-10-02518-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb5/9781324/27e68bff18b8/microorganisms-10-02518-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb5/9781324/1f0e4d3ea6df/microorganisms-10-02518-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb5/9781324/cd23923cabbc/microorganisms-10-02518-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb5/9781324/aa91a1bdc9ea/microorganisms-10-02518-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb5/9781324/189f63681226/microorganisms-10-02518-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb5/9781324/485c59e9241c/microorganisms-10-02518-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb5/9781324/55105b8b43b4/microorganisms-10-02518-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb5/9781324/27e68bff18b8/microorganisms-10-02518-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb5/9781324/1f0e4d3ea6df/microorganisms-10-02518-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb5/9781324/cd23923cabbc/microorganisms-10-02518-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb5/9781324/aa91a1bdc9ea/microorganisms-10-02518-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb5/9781324/189f63681226/microorganisms-10-02518-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb5/9781324/485c59e9241c/microorganisms-10-02518-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
The Antimicrobial Effect of Various Single-Strain and Multi-Strain Probiotics, Dietary Supplements or Other Beneficial Microbes against Common Clinical Wound Pathogens.各种单一菌株和多菌株益生菌、膳食补充剂或其他有益微生物对常见临床伤口病原体的抗菌作用。
Microorganisms. 2022 Dec 19;10(12):2518. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10122518.
2
Study of the In Vitro Antagonistic Activity of Various Single-Strain and Multi-Strain Probiotics against .研究各种单菌株和多菌株益生菌对. 的体外拮抗活性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 20;15(7):1539. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071539.
3
Comparative in vitro inhibition of urinary tract pathogens by single- and multi-strain probiotics.单株和多株益生菌对尿路感染病原体的体外抑制比较。
Eur J Nutr. 2013 Sep;52(6):1669-77. doi: 10.1007/s00394-013-0501-2. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
4
Efficacy of Using Probiotics with Antagonistic Activity against Pathogens of Wound Infections: An Integrative Review of Literature.益生菌拮抗活性在治疗感染性伤口中的疗效:文献综述的综合评价。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Dec 12;2019:7585486. doi: 10.1155/2019/7585486. eCollection 2019.
5
In vitro evaluation of single- and multi-strain probiotics: Inter-species inhibition between probiotic strains, and inhibition of pathogens.体外评价单一和多菌株益生菌:益生菌菌株之间的种间抑制作用,以及对病原体的抑制作用。
Anaerobe. 2012 Aug;18(4):405-13. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
6
Good Bugs vs Bad Bugs: Evaluation of Inhibitory Effect of Selected Probiotics against Enterococcus faecalis.有益菌与有害菌:所选益生菌对粪肠球菌抑制作用的评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Apr 1;18(4):312-316. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2037.
7
In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of a range of probiotics against pathogens: evidence for the effects of organic acids.体外评估一系列益生菌对病原体的抗菌活性:有机酸作用的证据。
Anaerobe. 2012 Oct;18(5):530-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
8
Probiotics for the Prevention of Pediatric Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea.益生菌预防儿童抗生素相关性腹泻
Explore (NY). 2016 Nov-Dec;12(6):463-466. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2016.08.015. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
9
Antimicrobial properties of Lactobacillus cell-free supernatants against multidrug-resistant urogenital pathogens.乳酸菌无细胞上清液对多药耐药泌尿生殖道病原体的抗菌特性。
Microbiologyopen. 2021 Feb;10(2):e1173. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.1173.
10
Analysis of in vitro and in vivo effects of probiotics against Campylobacter spp.益生菌对弯曲杆菌属的体外和体内作用分析
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2015 Mar-Apr;128(3-4):155-62.

引用本文的文献

1
Dairy Propionibacteria: Probiotic Properties and Their Molecular Bases.乳制品丙酸杆菌:益生菌特性及其分子基础
Biomolecules. 2025 Jun 17;15(6):886. doi: 10.3390/biom15060886.
2
Prediction of inhibitory peptides against E.coli with desired MIC value.预测具有所需最低抑菌浓度(MIC)值的抗大肠杆菌抑制肽。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 8;15(1):4672. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86638-z.
3
Antibacterial Activity and Toxicity of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Combined with Supernatants of spp. Against ESKAPE Bacteria: A Novel Mixture.氧化锌纳米颗粒与 spp. 上清液联合对ESKAPE细菌的抗菌活性和毒性:一种新型混合物。

本文引用的文献

1
Probiotics: Protecting Our Health from the Gut.益生菌:从肠道守护我们的健康。
Microorganisms. 2022 Jul 14;10(7):1428. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10071428.
2
Effects of Lactobacillus casei on Iron Metabolism and Intestinal Microflora in Rats Exposed to Alcohol and Iron.酒精和铁暴露大鼠中干酪乳杆菌对铁代谢和肠道菌群的影响。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jun;33(6):470-476. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2022.21370.
3
Probiotic Yeast : Back to Nature to Improve Human Health.益生菌酵母:回归自然以改善人类健康。
Iran J Pharm Res. 2023 Dec 2;22(1):e139222. doi: 10.5812/ijpr-139222. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
4
Strong Activity and No Resistance Induction Exerted by Cell-Free Supernatants from against Mono-Species and Dual-Species Biofilms of Wound Pathogens in In Vivo-like Conditions.无细胞上清液在类似体内条件下对单一和双物种伤口病原体生物膜的强活性和无抗性诱导作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Feb 8;25(4):2087. doi: 10.3390/ijms25042087.
5
Study of marine microorganism metabolites: new resources for bioactive natural products.海洋微生物代谢产物研究:生物活性天然产物的新资源
Front Microbiol. 2024 Jan 8;14:1285902. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1285902. eCollection 2023.
6
Probiotics Modulate Host Immune Response and Interact with the Gut Microbiota: Shaping Their Composition and Mediating Antibiotic Resistance.益生菌调节宿主免疫反应并与肠道微生物群相互作用:塑造其组成并介导抗生素耐药性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Sep 7;24(18):13783. doi: 10.3390/ijms241813783.
7
The Multi-Strain Probiotic OMNi-BiOTiC Active Reduces the Duration of Acute Upper Respiratory Disease in Older People: A Double-Blind, Randomised, Controlled Clinical Trial.多菌株益生菌OMNi-BiOTiC活性制剂可缩短老年人急性上呼吸道疾病的病程:一项双盲、随机、对照临床试验。
Microorganisms. 2023 Jul 5;11(7):1760. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11071760.
8
Antibiofilm and antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus cell free supernatant against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn wounds.乳酸菌无细胞上清液对烧伤创面分离的铜绿假单胞菌的抗生物膜和抗菌活性。
Int Wound J. 2023 Dec;20(10):4112-4121. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14305. Epub 2023 Jul 16.
9
Probiotics and Their Antimicrobial Effect.益生菌及其抗菌作用。
Microorganisms. 2023 Feb 19;11(2):528. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020528.
J Fungi (Basel). 2022 Apr 24;8(5):444. doi: 10.3390/jof8050444.
4
Using bifidobacterium and propionibacterium strains in probiotic consortia to normalize the gastrointestinal tract.使用双歧杆菌和丙酸杆菌菌株的益生菌联合,使胃肠道正常化。
Braz J Biol. 2022 May 4;84:e256945. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.256945. eCollection 2022.
5
In Vitro-In Vivo Correlation for the Antibacterial Effect of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum as a Topical Healer for Infected Burn Wound.植物乳杆菌作为局部治疗感染性烧伤创面的外用愈合剂的抗菌作用的体外-体内相关性。
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2022 Aug;14(4):675-689. doi: 10.1007/s12602-022-09934-4. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
6
Insights into the Composition of a Co-Culture of 10 Probiotic Strains (OMNi BiOTiC AAD10) and Effects of Its Postbiotic Culture Supernatant.益生菌菌株 10 株(OMNi BiOTiC AAD10)共培养物的组成及其发酵上清后生物效应的深入了解。
Nutrients. 2022 Mar 11;14(6):1194. doi: 10.3390/nu14061194.
7
Isolation and characterization of competitive exclusion microorganisms from animal wastes-based composts against Listeria monocytogenes.从基于动物粪便的堆肥中分离和鉴定抗李斯特菌的竞争性排除微生物。
J Appl Microbiol. 2022 Jun;132(6):4531-4543. doi: 10.1111/jam.15528. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
8
Probiotics and Their Effect on Surgical Wound Healing: A Systematic Review and New Insights into the Role of Nanotechnology.益生菌及其对手术伤口愈合的影响:系统评价及纳米技术作用的新见解。
Nutrients. 2021 Nov 26;13(12):4265. doi: 10.3390/nu13124265.
9
Assessment of probiotic adhesion and inhibitory effect on Escherichia coli and Salmonella adhesion.评估益生菌对大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌黏附的抑制效果。
Arch Microbiol. 2021 Dec;203(10):6267-6274. doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02593-z. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
10
Inhibitory effects of Lactobacillus casei Shirota against both Candida auris and Candida spp. isolates that cause vulvovaginal candidiasis and are resistant to antifungals.干酪乳杆菌 Shirota 对导致外阴阴道念珠菌病且对抗真菌药物耐药的念珠菌属和念珠菌属分离株均具有抑制作用。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021 Sep 23;21(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12906-021-03405-z.