Fijan Sabina, Kocbek Primož, Steyer Andrej, Vodičar Polona Maver, Strauss Maja
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maribor, Žitna ulica 15, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
Environment and Food, Division of Public Health Microbiology, National Laboratory of Health, Grablovičeva 44, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Microorganisms. 2022 Dec 19;10(12):2518. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10122518.
The skin is the largest organ in the human body and is colonized by a diverse microbiota that works in harmony to protect the skin. However, when skin damage occurs, the skin microbiota is also disrupted, and pathogens can invade the wound and cause infection. Probiotics or other beneficial microbes and their metabolites are one possible alternative treatment for combating skin pathogens via their antimicrobial effectiveness. The objective of our study was to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of seven multi-strain dietary supplements and eleven single-strain microbes that contain probiotics against 15 clinical wound pathogens using the agar spot assay, co-culturing assay, and agar well diffusion assay. We also conducted genera-specific and species-specific molecular methods to detect the DNA in the dietary supplements and single-strain beneficial microbes. We found that the multi-strain dietary supplements exhibited a statistically significant higher antagonistic effect against the challenge wound pathogens than the single-strain microbes and that lactobacilli-containing dietary supplements and single-strain microbes were significantly more efficient than the selected propionibacteria and bacilli. Differences in results between methods were also observed, possibly due to different mechanisms of action. Individual pathogens were susceptible to different dietary supplements or single-strain microbes. Perhaps an individual approach such as a 'probiogram' could be a possibility in the future as a method to find the most efficient targeted probiotic strains, cell-free supernatants, or neutralized cell-free supernatants that have the highest antagonistic effect against individual clinical wound pathogens.
皮肤是人体最大的器官,其上定殖着多种多样的微生物群,它们协同发挥作用以保护皮肤。然而,当皮肤受损时,皮肤微生物群也会被破坏,病原体可能侵入伤口并引发感染。益生菌或其他有益微生物及其代谢产物是通过其抗菌作用对抗皮肤病原体的一种可能的替代治疗方法。我们研究的目的是使用琼脂斑点试验、共培养试验和琼脂孔扩散试验,评估七种含有益生菌的多菌株膳食补充剂和十一种单菌株微生物对15种临床伤口病原体的抗菌效果。我们还采用属特异性和种特异性分子方法来检测膳食补充剂和单菌株有益微生物中的DNA。我们发现,多菌株膳食补充剂对受试伤口病原体的拮抗作用在统计学上显著高于单菌株微生物,并且含乳酸杆菌的膳食补充剂和单菌株微生物比选定的丙酸杆菌和芽孢杆菌显著更有效。还观察到不同方法之间结果存在差异,这可能是由于作用机制不同。个别病原体对不同的膳食补充剂或单菌株微生物敏感。也许将来可以采用一种个体化方法,比如“益生菌谱”,作为一种找到对个别临床伤口病原体具有最高拮抗作用的最有效的靶向益生菌菌株、无细胞上清液或中和的无细胞上清液的方法。