Institute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Ravila 14a, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
Molecules. 2022 Dec 18;27(24):9041. doi: 10.3390/molecules27249041.
The modern development of computer technology and different in silico methods have had an increasing impact on the discovery and development of new drugs. Different molecular docking techniques most widely used in silico methods in drug discovery. Currently, the time and financial costs for the initial hit identification can be significantly reduced due to the ability to perform high-throughput virtual screening of large compound libraries in a short time. However, the selection of potential hit compounds still remains more of a random process, because there is still no consensus on what the binding energy and ligand efficiency (LE) of a potentially active compound should be. In the best cases, only 20-30% of compounds identified by molecular docking are active in biological tests. In this work, we evaluated the impact of the docking software used as well as the type of the target protein on the molecular docking results and their accuracy using an example of the three most popular programs and five target proteins related to neurodegenerative diseases. In addition, we attempted to determine the "reliable range" of the binding energy and LE that would allow selecting compounds with biological activity in the desired concentration range.
计算机技术的现代发展和不同的计算机方法对新药的发现和开发产生了越来越大的影响。不同的分子对接技术是药物发现中最广泛使用的计算机方法之一。目前,由于能够在短时间内对大型化合物库进行高通量虚拟筛选,初始命中鉴定的时间和财务成本可以显著降低。然而,潜在命中化合物的选择仍然更多地是一个随机过程,因为对于潜在活性化合物的结合能和配体效率(LE)应该是多少,仍然没有共识。在最好的情况下,通过分子对接鉴定的化合物中只有 20-30%在生物测试中是活跃的。在这项工作中,我们使用三个最受欢迎的程序和五个与神经退行性疾病相关的目标蛋白的例子,评估了所使用的对接软件的类型以及目标蛋白的类型对分子对接结果及其准确性的影响。此外,我们试图确定结合能和 LE 的“可靠范围”,以便在所需浓度范围内选择具有生物活性的化合物。