• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

触摸、威胁与交易:疫情对消费者反应的影响以及购买水果和蔬菜时触摸可能性的中介作用。

Touch, threats, and transactions: Pandemic influences on consumer responses and the mediating role of touch likelihood when shopping for fruits and vegetables.

作者信息

Otterbring Tobias, Bhatnagar Roopali

机构信息

University of Agder, School of Business and Law, Department of Management, Universitetsveien 17, 4630 Kristiansand, Norway.

Institute of Retail Economics, Regeringsgatan 60, 103 29 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Food Qual Prefer. 2022 Apr;97:104461. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104461. Epub 2021 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104461
PMID:36567892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9759706/
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has influenced consumer behavior in numerous ways. Most of the public health measures have centered around minimizing social contact and physical touch. In the present study, we investigate the impact of such touch restrictions, introduced during the pandemic, on consumers' shopping responses and payment preferences in the context of a perishable food category amenable to tactile evaluation (fresh fruits and vegetables). The study used a single-factor between-subjects design (during vs. before the COVID-19 pandemic), with the data collected in a scenario-based online experiment from a sample of 729 participants. The results revealed significantly less favorable shopping responses during (vs. before) the pandemic in terms of purchase likelihood, satisfaction levels, and purchase confidence. Touch likelihood mediated the link between pandemic condition and shopping responses, such that participants in the pandemic condition reported a significantly lower touch likelihood of fresh fruits and vegetables than their counterparts in the pre-pandemic condition, which ultimately resulted in less favorable shopping responses. Participants in the pandemic condition also reported a decreased preference for tangible payment options (cash), with a corresponding increase in preferences for contactless payment methods (credit card or mobile payment). These findings contribute to our understanding of whether and how tactile aspects may influence consumers' shopping responses, offering important implications for retailers and people working in the food industry.

摘要

新冠疫情在诸多方面影响了消费者行为。大多数公共卫生措施都围绕着尽量减少社交接触和身体触碰展开。在本研究中,我们调查了疫情期间实施的此类触碰限制,在易腐食品类别(新鲜水果和蔬菜)适合触觉评估的背景下,对消费者购物反应和支付偏好的影响。该研究采用单因素被试间设计(新冠疫情期间与疫情之前),数据通过基于情景的在线实验收集,样本为729名参与者。结果显示,在购买可能性、满意度和购买信心方面,疫情期间(与疫情之前相比)的购物反应明显更不理想。触碰可能性介导了疫情状况与购物反应之间的联系,即疫情期间的参与者报告称,与疫情前的参与者相比,他们触碰新鲜水果和蔬菜的可能性显著降低,这最终导致了不太理想的购物反应。疫情期间的参与者还报告说,他们对有形支付方式(现金)的偏好降低,对非接触式支付方式(信用卡或移动支付)的偏好相应增加。这些发现有助于我们理解触觉因素是否以及如何影响消费者的购物反应,为零售商和食品行业从业者提供了重要启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f90c/9759706/5f463ad6e8c7/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f90c/9759706/5f463ad6e8c7/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f90c/9759706/5f463ad6e8c7/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Touch, threats, and transactions: Pandemic influences on consumer responses and the mediating role of touch likelihood when shopping for fruits and vegetables.触摸、威胁与交易:疫情对消费者反应的影响以及购买水果和蔬菜时触摸可能性的中介作用。
Food Qual Prefer. 2022 Apr;97:104461. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104461. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
2
The demand for online grocery shopping: COVID-induced changes in grocery shopping behavior of Canadian consumers.在线杂货购物的需求:加拿大消费者因 COVID-19 而改变的杂货购物行为。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 8;19(2):e0295538. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295538. eCollection 2024.
3
Online grocery shopping before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A meta-analytical review.2019冠状病毒病大流行之前及期间的在线食品杂货购物:一项荟萃分析综述。
Telemat Inform. 2022 Jul;71:101839. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2022.101839. Epub 2022 May 19.
4
Do liberals want curbside pickup more than conservatives? Contactless shopping as protectionary action against the COVID-19 pandemic.自由主义者比保守主义者更想要路边提货服务吗?非接触式购物作为针对新冠疫情的防护措施。
Int J Consum Stud. 2022 Mar;46(2):589-600. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12714. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
5
The use of mobile technologies in online shopping during the Covid-19 pandemic - an empirical study.新冠疫情期间移动技术在网络购物中的应用——一项实证研究。
Procedia Comput Sci. 2021;192:3413-3422. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.114. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
6
Contactless channel for shopping and delivery in the context of social distancing in response to COVID-19 pandemic.在应对新冠疫情的社交距离背景下的非接触式购物与配送渠道。
Electron Commer Res Appl. 2021 Jul-Aug;48:101075. doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101075. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
7
A Computational Model to Predict Consumer Behaviour During COVID-19 Pandemic.一种预测新冠疫情期间消费者行为的计算模型。
Comput Econ. 2022;59(4):1525-1538. doi: 10.1007/s10614-020-10069-3. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
8
Mothers' self-reported grocery shopping behaviours with their 2- to 7-year-old children: relationship between feeding practices and mothers' willingness to purchase child-requested nutrient-poor, marketed foods, and fruits and vegetables.母亲与 2 至 7 岁儿童一起购买食品的行为:喂养行为与母亲购买儿童要求的营养差、有市场推广的食物及水果和蔬菜的意愿之间的关系。
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Dec;20(18):3343-3348. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017002142. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
9
Online shopping consumer perception analysis and future network security service technology using logistic regression model.基于逻辑回归模型的网络购物消费者感知分析及未来网络安全服务技术
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2024 Jan 15;10:e1777. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1777. eCollection 2024.
10
Determinants of Consumers' Online/Offline Shopping Behaviours during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间消费者线上/线下购物行为的决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 8;18(4):1593. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041593.

本文引用的文献

1
Healthier eating: Covid-19 disruption as a catalyst for positive change.更健康的饮食:新冠疫情造成的混乱成为积极改变的催化剂。
Food Qual Prefer. 2021 Sep;92:104220. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104220. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
2
National identity predicts public health support during a global pandemic.国家认同预测全球大流行期间的公共卫生支持。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jan 26;13(1):517. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27668-9.
3
To fear the unknown: Covid-19 confinement, fear, and food choice.对未知的恐惧:新冠疫情封锁、恐惧与食物选择
Food Qual Prefer. 2021 Sep;92:104251. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104251. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
4
How has COVID-19, lockdown and social distancing changed alcohol drinking patterns? A cross-cultural perspective between britons and spaniards.新冠疫情、封锁措施和社交距离是如何改变饮酒模式的?英国人和西班牙人之间的跨文化视角。
Food Qual Prefer. 2022 Jan;95:104344. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104344. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
5
Changes in Food Consumption During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of Consumer Survey Data From the First Lockdown Period in Denmark, Germany, and Slovenia.新冠疫情期间的食品消费变化:丹麦、德国和斯洛文尼亚首次封锁期消费者调查数据分析
Front Nutr. 2021 Mar 8;8:635859. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.635859. eCollection 2021.
6
Gender differences in COVID-19 attitudes and behavior: Panel evidence from eight countries.COVID-19 态度和行为的性别差异:来自八个国家的面板证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Nov 3;117(44):27285-27291. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2012520117. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
7
Social Distancing during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Who Are the Present and Future Noncompliers?新冠疫情期间的社交距离:当前及未来不遵守规定的是哪些人?
Public Adm Rev. 2020 Sep-Oct;80(5):805-814. doi: 10.1111/puar.13240. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
8
The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on food priorities. Results from a preliminary study using social media and an online survey with Spanish consumers.新冠疫情封锁对食物优先级的影响。一项使用社交媒体及对西班牙消费者进行在线调查的初步研究结果。
Food Qual Prefer. 2020 Dec;86:104028. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104028. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
9
The habitual nature of food purchases at the supermarket: Implications for policy making.超市食品购买的习惯性:对政策制定的启示。
Appetite. 2020 Dec 1;155:104844. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104844. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
10
What Does Food Retail Research Tell Us About the Implications of Coronavirus (COVID-19) for Grocery Purchasing Habits?食品零售研究能告诉我们关于冠状病毒(COVID-19)对食品杂货购买习惯的影响有哪些?
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 5;11:1448. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01448. eCollection 2020.