Lu Cuiwei, Li Deyang, Ren Jie, Liu Huanmin, Zhang Xueqin
School of Health Management, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Huiai Hospital), Guangzhou, China.
Int J Dev Disabil. 2021 Mar 26;68(6):809-823. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2021.1895697. eCollection 2022.
Special education is a natural yardstick to measure a country's educational level and the whole civilization. China has a massive special education undertaking that develops rapidly and forms a unique system. This study used bibliometric methods to conduct a macroscopic comparative analysis of Chinese and global literature, discuss the existing problems of China's special education, and put forward relevant recommendations accordingly. The CiteSpace V visual analysis software was used to draw the scientific knowledge map of the Chinese local database CSSCI and the global database SSCI, and the results of the map were discussed. Research conclusions: Firstly, China's research institutions lack a macro-level cooperation network. Second, there are differences in the focus of special education objects between China and the world. This difference is mainly caused by the definition of special education objects, which may be influenced by the formulation of educational concepts and policies. Thirdly, in the reference co-citation analysis, the focus of Chinese research is narrow and generally focuses on special education teachers. This article provides implications for solving special education problems in China, and its research method provides a reference for future related research for other countries.
特殊教育是衡量一个国家教育水平乃至整个文明程度的天然标尺。中国拥有庞大的特殊教育事业,发展迅速且形成了独特的体系。本研究运用文献计量学方法对中国和全球文献进行宏观比较分析,探讨中国特殊教育存在的问题,并据此提出相关建议。使用CiteSpace V可视化分析软件绘制中国本土数据库CSSCI和全球数据库SSCI的科学知识图谱,并对图谱结果进行讨论。研究结论:其一,中国研究机构缺乏宏观层面的合作网络。其二,中国与世界在特殊教育对象的关注重点上存在差异。这种差异主要由特殊教育对象的定义所致,可能受到教育理念和政策制定的影响。其三,在参考文献共被引分析中,中国研究的关注点较为狭窄,普遍聚焦于特殊教育教师。本文为解决中国特殊教育问题提供了启示,其研究方法为其他国家未来相关研究提供了参考。