Suppr超能文献

远程观察性多发性硬化症研究:自然实验。

Remote Observational Research for Multiple Sclerosis: A Natural Experiment.

机构信息

From the UCSF Weill Institute for Neuroscience, Division of Neuroimmunology and Glial Biology, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

出版信息

Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2022 Dec 30;10(2). doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000200070. Print 2023 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Prospective, deeply phenotyped research cohorts monitoring individuals with chronic neurologic conditions, such as multiple sclerosis (MS), depend on continued participant engagement. The COVID-19 pandemic restricted in-clinic research activities, threatening this longitudinal engagement, but also forced adoption of televideo-enabled care. This offered a natural experiment in which to analyze key dimensions of remote research: (1) comparison of remote vs in-clinic visit costs from multiple perspectives and (2) comparison of the remote with in-clinic measures in cross-sectional and longitudinal disability evaluations.

METHODS

Between March 2020 and December 2021, 207 MS cohort participants underwent hybrid in-clinic and virtual research visits; 96 contributed 100 "matched visits," that is, in-clinic (Neurostatus-Expanded Disability Status Scale [NS-EDSS]) and remote (televideo-enabled EDSS [tele-EDSS]; electronic patient-reported EDSS [ePR-EDSS]) evaluations. Clinical, demographic, and socioeconomic characteristics of participants were collected.

RESULTS

The costs of remote visits were lower than in-clinic visits for research investigators (facilities, personnel, parking, participant compensation) but also for participants (travel, caregiver time) and carbon footprint ( < 0.05 for each). Median cohort EDSS was similar between the 3 modalities (NS-EDSS: 2, tele-EDSS: 1.5, ePR-EDSS: 2, range 0.6.5); the remote evaluations were each noninferior to the NS-EDSS within ±0.5 EDSS point (TOST for noninferiority, < 0.01 for each). Furthermore, year to year, the % of participants with worsening/stable/improved EDSS scores was similar, whether each annual evaluation used NS-EDSS or whether it switched from NS-EDSS to tele-EDSS.

DISCUSSION

Altogether, the current findings suggest that remote evaluations can reduce the costs of research participation for patients, while providing a reasonable evaluation of disability trajectory longitudinally. This could inform the design of remote research that is more inclusive of diverse participants.

摘要

背景与目的

前瞻性、深入表型研究队列监测患有慢性神经系统疾病(如多发性硬化症[MS])的个体,需要参与者持续参与。COVID-19 大流行限制了门诊研究活动,威胁到这种纵向参与,但也迫使采用远程视频支持的护理。这提供了一个自然实验,可以分析远程研究的关键维度:(1)从多个角度比较远程与门诊就诊的成本;(2)在横断面和纵向残疾评估中比较远程与门诊评估。

方法

2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 12 月,207 名 MS 队列参与者接受了混合门诊和虚拟研究访问;96 名参与者贡献了 100 次“匹配访问”,即门诊(扩展残疾状况量表[NS-EDSS])和远程(远程视频支持的 EDSS[远程-EDSS];电子患者报告的 EDSS[ePR-EDSS])评估。收集参与者的临床、人口统计学和社会经济特征。

结果

与门诊就诊相比,远程就诊的研究人员(设施、人员、停车、参与者补偿)和参与者(旅行、护理人员时间)以及碳足迹(每项费用均低于 0.05)成本更低。队列的 EDSS 中位数在 3 种模式之间相似(NS-EDSS:2,远程-EDSS:1.5,ePR-EDSS:2,范围 0.6-5);远程评估均在±0.5 EDSS 点内非劣于 NS-EDSS(TOST 用于非劣效性,每项均小于 0.01)。此外,无论每年的评估是使用 NS-EDSS 还是从 NS-EDSS 切换到远程-EDSS,每年参与者 EDSS 评分恶化/稳定/改善的比例相似。

讨论

总的来说,目前的研究结果表明,远程评估可以降低患者参与研究的成本,同时提供对残疾轨迹的合理纵向评估。这可以为更具包容性的远程研究设计提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca8b/9808915/f78940325fe5/NXI-2022-200077f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验