• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于可解释机器学习的 ICU 相关性脓毒症脑病预测与风险评估。

Prediction and risk assessment of sepsis-associated encephalopathy in ICU based on interpretable machine learning.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.

Institute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100020, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 31;12(1):22621. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-27134-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-27134-6
PMID:36587113
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9805434/
Abstract

Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a major complication of sepsis and is associated with high mortality and poor long-term prognosis. The purpose of this study is to develop interpretable machine learning models to predict the occurrence of SAE after ICU admission and implement the individual prediction and analysis. Patients with sepsis admitted to ICU were included. SAE was diagnosed as glasgow coma score (GCS) less than 15. Statistical analysis at baseline was performed between SAE and non-SAE. Six machine learning classifiers were employed to predict the occurrence of SAE, and the adjustment of model super parameters was performed by using Bayesian optimization method. Finally, the optimal algorithm was selected according to the prediction efficiency. In addition, professional physicians were invited to evaluate our model prediction results for further quantitative assessment of the model interpretability. The preliminary analysis of variance showed significant differences in the incidence of SAE among patients with pathogen infection. There were significant differences in physical indicators like respiratory rate, temperature, SpO and mean arterial pressure (P < 0.001). In addition, the laboratory results were also significantly different. The optimal classification model (XGBoost) indicated that the best risk factors (cut-off points) were creatinine (1.1 mg/dl), mean respiratory rate (18), pH (7.38), age (72), chlorine (101 mmol/L), sodium (138.5 k/ul), SAPSII score (23), platelet count (160), and phosphorus (2.4 and 5.0 mg/dL). The ranked features derived from the best model (AUC is 0.8837) were mechanical ventilation, duration of mechanical ventilation, phosphorus, SOFA score, and vasopressin usage. The SAE risk prediction model based on XGBoost created here can make very accurate predictions using simple indicators and support the visual explanation. The interpretable model was effectively evaluated by professional physicians and can help them predict the occurrence of SAE more intuitively.

摘要

脓毒症相关性脑病(SAE)是脓毒症的主要并发症,与高死亡率和不良预后相关。本研究旨在开发可解释的机器学习模型,以预测 ICU 入院后 SAE 的发生,并进行个体预测和分析。纳入 ICU 收治的脓毒症患者。SAE 诊断为格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)<15。在基线时,对 SAE 和非 SAE 患者进行了统计学分析。采用 6 种机器学习分类器预测 SAE 的发生,并采用贝叶斯优化方法对模型超参数进行调整。最后,根据预测效率选择最优算法。此外,还邀请了专业医生对我们的模型预测结果进行评估,以进一步对模型的可解释性进行定量评估。初步方差分析显示,病原体感染患者的 SAE 发生率存在显著差异。呼吸频率、体温、SpO2 和平均动脉压等生理指标存在显著差异(P<0.001)。此外,实验室结果也存在显著差异。最优分类模型(XGBoost)表明,最佳风险因素(临界值)为肌酐(1.1mg/dl)、平均呼吸频率(18)、pH(7.38)、年龄(72)、氯(101mmol/L)、钠(138.5k/ul)、SAPSII 评分(23)、血小板计数(160)和磷(2.4 和 5.0mg/dL)。最佳模型得出的排名特征(AUC 为 0.8837)包括机械通气、机械通气持续时间、磷、SOFA 评分和血管加压素使用。本研究构建的基于 XGBoost 的 SAE 风险预测模型可以使用简单的指标进行非常准确的预测,并支持可视化解释。专业医生对可解释模型进行了有效评估,可以帮助他们更直观地预测 SAE 的发生。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72b6/9805434/016a950fa307/41598_2022_27134_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72b6/9805434/44e8454d2a28/41598_2022_27134_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72b6/9805434/d4af41e57e2c/41598_2022_27134_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72b6/9805434/b8f2f7c62fee/41598_2022_27134_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72b6/9805434/5d95cc70db0b/41598_2022_27134_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72b6/9805434/27a4469b4669/41598_2022_27134_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72b6/9805434/016a950fa307/41598_2022_27134_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72b6/9805434/44e8454d2a28/41598_2022_27134_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72b6/9805434/d4af41e57e2c/41598_2022_27134_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72b6/9805434/b8f2f7c62fee/41598_2022_27134_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72b6/9805434/5d95cc70db0b/41598_2022_27134_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72b6/9805434/27a4469b4669/41598_2022_27134_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72b6/9805434/016a950fa307/41598_2022_27134_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction and risk assessment of sepsis-associated encephalopathy in ICU based on interpretable machine learning.基于可解释机器学习的 ICU 相关性脓毒症脑病预测与风险评估。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 31;12(1):22621. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-27134-6.
2
[Sepsis associated encephalopathy is an independently risk factor for nosocomial coma in patients with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study of 261 patients].[脓毒症相关性脑病是幕上脑出血患者医院获得性昏迷的独立危险因素:一项对261例患者的回顾性队列研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2016 Aug;28(8):723-8. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2016.08.011.
3
[Clinical study on the predictive value of regional cerebral oxygen saturation for the occurrence of sepsis-associated encephalopathy].[局部脑氧饱和度对脓毒症相关性脑病发生的预测价值的临床研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2022 Apr;34(4):412-415. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20211116-01719.
4
Machine learning approach for the prediction of 30-day mortality in patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy.机器学习在脓毒症相关性脑病患者 30 天死亡率预测中的应用。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jul 4;22(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01664-z.
5
[The diagnostic value of neuron-specific enolase, central nervous system specific protein and interleukin-6 in sepsis-associated encephalopathy].[神经元特异性烯醇化酶、中枢神经系统特异性蛋白及白细胞介素-6在脓毒症相关性脑病中的诊断价值]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Oct 1;56(10):747-751. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2017.10.008.
6
Serum S100β is a better biomarker than neuron-specific enolase for sepsis-associated encephalopathy and determining its prognosis: a prospective and observational study.血清S100β是一种比神经元特异性烯醇化酶更好的用于脓毒症相关性脑病及其预后判定的生物标志物:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Neurochem Res. 2014 Jul;39(7):1263-9. doi: 10.1007/s11064-014-1308-0. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
7
[Expression level of glial fibrillary acidic protein and its clinical significance in patients with 
sepsis-associated encephalopathy].[胶质纤维酸性蛋白在脓毒症相关性脑病患者中的表达水平及其临床意义]
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019 Oct 28;44(10):1137-1142. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2019.190180.
8
Factor analysis based on SHapley Additive exPlanations for sepsis-associated encephalopathy in ICU mortality prediction using XGBoost - a retrospective study based on two large database.基于夏普利加性解释的因子分析在使用XGBoost预测ICU中脓毒症相关性脑病死亡率中的应用——一项基于两个大型数据库的回顾性研究
Front Neurol. 2023 Dec 14;14:1290117. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1290117. eCollection 2023.
9
Characterization of Sepsis and Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy.脓毒症和脓毒症相关性脑病的特征。
J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Nov-Dec;34(11-12):938-945. doi: 10.1177/0885066617719750. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
10
Prognostic role of urinary ketone body in patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy without hepatic failure: a retrospective cohort study.尿酮体对无肝衰竭脓毒症相关性脑病患者预后的预测作用:一项回顾性队列研究。
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Jun;19(4):983-991. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03563-1. Epub 2024 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic models for sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.脓毒症相关性脑病的诊断模型:一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 31;16:1645397. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1645397. eCollection 2025.
2
Automated seizure detection in epilepsy using a novel dynamic temporal-spatial graph attention network.使用新型动态时空图注意力网络进行癫痫发作的自动检测。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 12;15(1):16392. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01015-0.
3
Early prediction of sepsis associated encephalopathy in elderly ICU patients using machine learning models: a retrospective study based on the MIMIC-IV database.

本文引用的文献

1
A recurrent machine learning model predicts intracranial hypertension in neurointensive care patients.一种反复出现的机器学习模型可预测神经重症监护病房患者的颅内压升高。
Brain. 2022 Aug 27;145(8):2910-2919. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab453.
2
Automated machine learning-based model predicts postoperative delirium using readily extractable perioperative collected electronic data.基于自动化机器学习的模型使用易于提取的围手术期收集的电子数据预测术后谵妄。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2022 Apr;28(4):608-618. doi: 10.1111/cns.13758. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
3
Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy: from Pathophysiology to Progress in Experimental Studies.
使用机器学习模型对老年重症监护病房患者脓毒症相关脑病进行早期预测:一项基于MIMIC-IV数据库的回顾性研究
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Apr 17;15:1545979. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1545979. eCollection 2025.
4
Flexible Patched Brain Transformer model for EEG decoding.用于脑电图解码的灵活修补脑变压器模型。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 29;15(1):10935. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86294-3.
5
Role of Acorus calamus extract in reducing exosome secretion by targeting Rab27a and nSMase2: a therapeutic approach for breast cancer.菖蒲提取物通过靶向Rab27a和nSMase2减少外泌体分泌的作用:一种乳腺癌的治疗方法
Mol Biol Rep. 2025 Jan 15;52(1):124. doi: 10.1007/s11033-024-10203-6.
6
Application of random survival forest to establish a nomogram combining clinlabomics-score and clinical data for predicting brain metastasis in primary lung cancer.应用随机生存森林构建列线图,结合临床实验室组学评分和临床数据预测原发性肺癌脑转移。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2025 Apr;27(4):1472-1483. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03688-x. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
7
Enhancing predictions with a stacking ensemble model for ICU mortality risk in patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy.使用堆叠集成模型提高脓毒症相关性脑病患者 ICU 死亡率风险预测。
J Int Med Res. 2024 Mar;52(3):3000605241239013. doi: 10.1177/03000605241239013.
8
Elucidation of population stratifying markers and selective sweeps in crossbred Landlly pig population using genome-wide SNP data.利用全基因组 SNP 数据阐明杂交 Landrace 猪群体中的群体分层标记和选择清除。
Mamm Genome. 2024 Jun;35(2):170-185. doi: 10.1007/s00335-024-10029-4. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
9
Optimizing the prediction of sepsis-associated encephalopathy with cerebral circulation time utilizing a nomogram: a pilot study in the intensive care unit.利用列线图优化脑循环时间对脓毒症相关性脑病的预测:重症监护病房的一项初步研究
Front Neurol. 2024 Jan 11;14:1303075. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1303075. eCollection 2023.
10
SMiT: symmetric mask transformer for disease severity detection.SMiT:用于疾病严重程度检测的对称掩模转换器。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov;149(17):16075-16086. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05223-x. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
脓毒症相关性脑病:从病理生理学到实验研究的进展。
Mol Neurobiol. 2021 Jun;58(6):2770-2779. doi: 10.1007/s12035-021-02303-2. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
4
A retrospective study of sepsis-associated encephalopathy: epidemiology, clinical features and adverse outcomes.脓毒症相关性脑病的回顾性研究:流行病学、临床特征和不良预后。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 6;20(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00374-3.
5
Sepsis-Associated Brain Dysfunction: A Review of Current Literature.脓毒症相关性脑功能障碍:当前文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 12;17(16):5852. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165852.
6
Development of a nomogram to predict 30-day mortality of patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a retrospective cohort study.用于预测脓毒症相关性脑病患者30天死亡率的列线图的开发:一项回顾性队列研究
J Intensive Care. 2020 Jul 2;8:45. doi: 10.1186/s40560-020-00459-y. eCollection 2020.
7
Septic-Associated Encephalopathy: a Comprehensive Review.脓毒症相关性脑病:全面综述。
Neurotherapeutics. 2020 Apr;17(2):392-403. doi: 10.1007/s13311-020-00862-1.
8
Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.机器学习在脓毒症预测中的应用:诊断试验准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Mar;46(3):383-400. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05872-y. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
9
Sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a vicious cycle of immunosuppression.脓毒症相关性脑病:免疫抑制的恶性循环。
J Neuroinflammation. 2020 Jan 10;17(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12974-020-1701-3.
10
Poldip2 mediates blood-brain barrier disruption in a model of sepsis-associated encephalopathy.Poldip2 介导脓毒症相关性脑病模型中的血脑屏障破坏。
J Neuroinflammation. 2019 Nov 28;16(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1575-4.