• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Implementation of an Epidural Rounding Reminder in the Electronic Medical Record Improves Performance of Standardized Patient Assessments during Labor.电子病历中硬膜外穿刺提醒的实施可提高分娩时标准化患者评估的表现。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Mar;14(2):238-244. doi: 10.1055/a-2011-8259. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
2
[Effects of double-catheter epidural analgesia by lidocaine injection respectively on the delivery outcomes and maternal-infant complications for persistent posterior or lateral occipital position of protracted active phase].利多卡因分别双侧导管硬膜外注射用于活跃期持续性枕后位或枕横位分娩结局及母婴并发症的影响
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jul 25;55(7):457-464. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20191228-00705.
3
The Labor Analgesia Requirements in Nulliparous Women Randomized to Epidural Catheter Placement in a High or Low Intervertebral Space.随机接受高或低椎间隙硬膜外导管置入的初产妇的分娩镇痛需求
Anesth Analg. 2017 Dec;125(6):1969-1974. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002076.
4
Ultrasound guided L5-S1 placement of labor epidural does not improve dermatomal block in parturients.超声引导下 L5-S1 置管行分娩硬膜外阻滞并不能改善产妇的皮节阻滞效果。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019 May;38:52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
5
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Music Use During Epidural Catheter Placement on Laboring Parturient Anxiety, Pain, and Satisfaction.硬膜外导管置入过程中使用音乐对分娩产妇焦虑、疼痛及满意度影响的随机对照试验
Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):542-547. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001656.
6
[Efficacy and delivery outcomes of women underwent double-catheter epidural block during labor].[分娩期间接受双导管硬膜外阻滞的女性的疗效及分娩结局]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Nov;45(11):819-24.
7
Extending epidural analgesia for intrapartum cesarean section following epidural labor analgesia: a retrospective cohort study.椎管内分娩镇痛后行剖宫产术时延长硬膜外镇痛:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Mar;35(6):1127-1133. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1743661. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
8
A randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and respiratory effects of patient-controlled intravenous remifentanil analgesia and patient-controlled epidural analgesia in laboring women.一项随机对照试验研究了产妇自控静脉注射瑞芬太尼镇痛和自控硬膜外镇痛的疗效和呼吸影响。
Anesth Analg. 2014 Mar;118(3):589-97. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a7cd1b.
9
Quality of Labor Analgesia with Dural Puncture Epidural versus Standard Epidural Technique in Obese Parturients: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Study.肥胖产妇中硬脊膜穿刺硬膜外镇痛与标准硬膜外技术的分娩镇痛质量:一项双盲随机对照研究
Anesthesiology. 2022 May 1;136(5):678-687. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004137.
10
Epidural labor analgesia: continuous infusion versus patient-controlled epidural analgesia with background infusion versus without a background infusion.硬膜外分娩镇痛:持续输注与背景输注的患者自控硬膜外镇痛对比以及与无背景输注的对比。
J Pain. 2007 Dec;8(12):970-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.07.002. Epub 2007 Aug 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of a standardized epidural top-up algorithm for inadequate labor epidural analgesia: a single-center retrospective study.用于分娩时硬膜外镇痛不足的标准化追加硬膜外药物算法的实施:一项单中心回顾性研究
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2024 Sep 12;37(6):908-913. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2024.2401739. eCollection 2024.
2
A standardized algorithm for assessing labor epidural analgesia.一种评估分娩硬膜外镇痛的标准化算法。
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2024 Sep 20;37(6):914-915. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2024.2403937. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Unmet Needs for Transdermal Patch Management in Electronic Medication Administration Records: An Analysis of Data from 66 Aged Care Facilities.经皮贴片管理在电子药物管理记录中的未满足需求:来自 66 家老年护理机构的数据分析。
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 Oct;11(5):812-820. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721011. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
2
Improving Clinician Decisions and Communication in Critical Care Using Novel Information Technology.利用新型信息技术改善重症监护临床决策和沟通。
Mil Med. 2020 Feb 12;185(1-2):e254-e261. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz151.
3
Determinants of women's dissatisfaction with anaesthesia care in labour and delivery.产妇分娩时对麻醉护理不满意的决定因素。
Anaesthesia. 2019 Sep;74(9):1112-1120. doi: 10.1111/anae.14756. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
4
Centers of Excellence for Anesthesia Care of Obstetric Patients.产科患者麻醉护理卓越中心
Anesth Analg. 2019 May;128(5):844-846. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004027.
5
General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: Occasionally Essential but Best Avoided.剖宫产的全身麻醉:偶尔必要但最好避免。
Anesthesiology. 2019 Jun;130(6):864-866. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002708.
6
Adverse Events and Factors Associated with Potentially Avoidable Use of General Anesthesia in Cesarean Deliveries.剖宫产术中潜在可避免使用全身麻醉的不良事件及相关因素。
Anesthesiology. 2019 Jun;130(6):912-922. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002629.
7
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.硬膜外镇痛与非硬膜外镇痛或无镇痛用于分娩疼痛管理的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4.
8
Investigating determinants for patient satisfaction in women receiving epidural analgesia for labour pain: a retrospective cohort study.调查接受硬膜外分娩镇痛的女性患者满意度的决定因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 May 9;18(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0514-8.
9
Operating room-to-incision interval and neonatal outcome in emergency caesarean section: a retrospective 5-year cohort study.手术室到切口的时间间隔与急诊剖宫产新生儿结局的关系:一项回顾性 5 年队列研究。
Anaesthesia. 2018 Jul;73(7):825-831. doi: 10.1111/anae.14296. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
10
Failure to Extend Epidural Labor Analgesia for Cesarean Delivery Anesthesia: A Focused Review.剖宫产麻醉时未延长硬膜外分娩镇痛:一项重点综述。
Anesth Analg. 2016 Nov;123(5):1174-1180. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001437.

电子病历中硬膜外穿刺提醒的实施可提高分娩时标准化患者评估的表现。

Implementation of an Epidural Rounding Reminder in the Electronic Medical Record Improves Performance of Standardized Patient Assessments during Labor.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.

Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Mar;14(2):238-244. doi: 10.1055/a-2011-8259. Epub 2023 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1055/a-2011-8259
PMID:36634697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10033221/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Poorly functioning labor epidural catheters lead to pain and dissatisfaction. Regular catheter assessment ensures timely identification of malfunction and may improve safety by facilitating rapid and successful conversion to general anesthesia for emergency cesarean. Informatics-based systems encourage standardization of care to identify epidural malfunctions earlier.

OBJECTIVES

This article demonstrates that visual epidural rounding reminder display on an electronic patient board would alert clinicians to elapsed time and decrease mean time between assessments.

METHODS

As a quality initiative, we implemented an epidural rounding reminder on our obstetric patient board. The reminder indicated the number of elapsed minutes since placement or last patient assessment. We retrospectively reviewed labor epidural charts 3 months prior to and 5 months following reminder implementation, with a 4-week washout period. The primary outcome was mean time between documented epidural assessments, with secondary outcomes including maximum time between assessments, total number of assessments during labor, catheter replacement rates, and patient satisfaction. Unadjusted comparisons between pre- and postimplementation groups were conducted using Wilcoxon's rank-sum and Pearson's chi-square tests, as appropriate. A test for equal variances was conducted for time between assessment outcomes.

RESULTS

Following implementation, mean time between assessments decreased from a median of 173 (interquartile range [IQR]: 53, 314) to 100 (IQR: 74, 125) minutes ( <0.001), and maximum time between assessments decreased from median 330 (IQR: 60, 542) to 162 (IQR: 125, 212) minutes ( < 0.001). Total number of evaluations during labor increased from 3 (IQR: 2, 4) to 5 (IQR: 3, 7;  < 0.001). Decreased variance in mean and maximum time between assessments was noted following reminder implementation ( < 0.001). Epidural replacement rates decreased from 14 to 5% postimplementation ( < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was unchanged.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of an informatics-based solution can promote standardization of care. A simple epidural rounding reminder prompted clinicians to perform more frequent labor epidural assessments. In the future, these process improvements must be linked to improvements in patient experiences and outcomes.

摘要

背景

功能不良的分娩硬膜外导管会导致疼痛和不满。定期对导管进行评估可确保及时发现故障,并通过促进紧急剖宫产时迅速成功地转为全身麻醉来提高安全性。基于信息学的系统鼓励标准化护理,以更早地识别硬膜外故障。

目的

本文证明,在电子患者板上显示视觉硬膜外巡回提醒显示器将提醒临床医生经过的时间,并减少评估之间的平均时间。

方法

作为一项质量倡议,我们在产科患者板上实施了硬膜外巡回提醒。该提醒指示了自放置或上次患者评估以来经过的分钟数。我们回顾性地审查了提醒实施前 3 个月和实施后 5 个月的分娩硬膜外图表,并有 4 周的洗脱期。主要结局是记录的硬膜外评估之间的平均时间,次要结局包括评估之间的最大时间、分娩期间的总评估次数、导管更换率和患者满意度。使用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验和 Pearson 卡方检验(视情况而定)对实施前后组进行了未经调整的比较。对评估结果之间的方差进行了相等方差检验。

结果

实施后,评估之间的平均时间从中位数 173(四分位距 [IQR]:53,314)减少到 100(IQR:74,125)分钟(<0.001),最大时间从中位数 330(IQR:60,542)减少到 162(IQR:125,212)分钟(<0.001)。分娩期间的评估总数从 3(IQR:2,4)增加到 5(IQR:3,7;<0.001)。实施提醒后,平均和最大时间之间的方差减少(<0.001)。实施后,硬膜外更换率从 14%降至 5%(<0.001)。患者满意度保持不变。

结论

基于信息学的解决方案的实施可以促进护理标准化。简单的硬膜外巡回提醒提示临床医生更频繁地进行分娩硬膜外评估。在未来,这些流程改进必须与患者体验和结果的改善联系起来。