Suppr超能文献

心血管事件与使用12导联心电图预测的人工智能年龄

Cardiovascular events and artificial intelligence-predicted age using 12-lead electrocardiograms.

作者信息

Hirota Naomi, Suzuki Shinya, Motogi Jun, Nakai Hiroshi, Matsuzawa Wataru, Takayanagi Tsuneo, Umemoto Takuya, Hyodo Akira, Satoh Keiichi, Arita Takuto, Yagi Naoharu, Otsuka Takayuki, Yamashita Takeshi

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Cardiovascular Institute, Tokyo, Japan.

Nihon Kohden Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2023 Jan 6;44:101172. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2023.101172. eCollection 2023 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is increasing evidence that 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG) can be used to predict biological age, which is associated with cardiovascular events. However, the utility of artificial intelligence (AI)-predicted age using ECGs remains unclear.

METHODS

Using a single-center database, we developed an AI-enabled ECG using 17 042 sinus rhythm ECGs (SR-ECG) to predict chronological age (CA) with a convolutional neural network that yields AI-predicted age. Using the 5-fold cross validation method, AI-predicted age deriving from the test dataset was yielded for all ECGs. The incidence by AgeDiff and the areas under the curve by receiver operating characteristic curve with AI-predicted age for cardiovascular events were analyzed.

RESULTS

During the mean follow-up period of 460.1 days, there were 543 cardiovascular events. The annualized incidence of cardiovascular events was 2.24 %, 2.44 %, and 3.01 %/year for patients with AgeDiff < -6, -6 to ≤6, and >6 years, respectively. The areas under the curve for cardiovascular events with CA and AI-predicted age, respectively, were 0.673 and 0.679 (Delong's test, P = 0.388) for all patients; 0.642 and 0.700 (P = 0.003) for younger patients (CA < 60 years); and 0.584 and 0.570 (P = 0.268) for older patients (CA ≥ 60 years).

CONCLUSIONS

AI-predicted age using 12-lead ECGs showed superiority in predicting cardiovascular events compared with CA in younger patients, but not in older patients.

摘要

背景

越来越多的证据表明,12导联心电图(ECG)可用于预测与心血管事件相关的生物学年龄。然而,利用心电图通过人工智能(AI)预测年龄的效用仍不明确。

方法

我们使用单中心数据库,利用17042份窦性心律心电图(SR-ECG)开发了一种基于人工智能的心电图,通过卷积神经网络预测实际年龄(CA),得出人工智能预测年龄。采用5折交叉验证法,得出所有心电图来自测试数据集的人工智能预测年龄。分析了年龄差值(AgeDiff)的发生率以及人工智能预测年龄用于心血管事件的受试者工作特征曲线下面积。

结果

在平均460.1天的随访期内,发生了543例心血管事件。AgeDiff<-6岁、-6至≤6岁和>6岁的患者心血管事件的年化发生率分别为2.24%、2.44%和3.01%/年。所有患者中,实际年龄和人工智能预测年龄用于心血管事件的曲线下面积分别为0.673和0.679(德龙检验,P = 0.388);年轻患者(实际年龄<60岁)为0.642和0.700(P = 0.003);老年患者(实际年龄≥60岁)为0.584和0.570(P = 0.268)。

结论

利用12导联心电图通过人工智能预测年龄在预测年轻患者心血管事件方面优于实际年龄,但在老年患者中并非如此。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a79f/9841236/9c383709495c/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验