Wrigglesworth Jo, Ryan Joanne, Ward Phillip G D, Woods Robyn L, Storey Elsdon, Egan Gary F, Murray Anne, Espinoza Sara E, Shah Raj C, Trevaks Ruth E, Ward Stephanie A, Harding Ian H
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Vic, Australia.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 Jan 4;14:1063721. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.1063721. eCollection 2022.
Neuroimaging-based 'brain age' can identify individuals with 'advanced' or 'resilient' brain aging. Brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD) is predictive of cognitive and physical health outcomes. However, it is unknown how individual health and lifestyle factors may modify the relationship between brain-PAD and future cognitive or functional performance. We aimed to identify health-related subgroups of older individuals with resilient or advanced brain-PAD, and determine if membership in these subgroups is differentially associated with changes in cognition and frailty over three to five years.
Brain-PAD was predicted from T1-weighted images acquired from 326 community-dwelling older adults (73.8 ± 3.6 years, 42.3% female), recruited from the larger ASPREE (ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly) trial. Participants were grouped as having resilient (n=159) or advanced (n=167) brain-PAD, and latent class analysis (LCA) was performed using a set of cognitive, lifestyle, and health measures. We examined associations of class membership with longitudinal change in cognitive function and frailty deficit accumulation index (FI) using linear mixed models adjusted for age, sex and education.
Subgroups of resilient and advanced brain aging were comparable in all characteristics before LCA. Two typically similar latent classes were identified for both subgroups of brain agers: class 1 were characterized by low prevalence of obesity and better physical health and class 2 by poor cardiometabolic, physical and cognitive health. Among resilient brain agers, class 1 was associated with a decrease in cognition, and class 2 with an increase over 5 years, though was a small effect that was equivalent to a 0.04 standard deviation difference per year. No significant class distinctions were evident with FI. For advanced brain agers, there was no evidence of an association between class membership and changes in cognition or FI.
These results demonstrate that the relationship between brain age and cognitive trajectories may be influenced by other health-related factors. In particular, people with age-resilient brains had different trajectories of cognitive change depending on their cognitive and physical health status at baseline. Future predictive models of aging outcomes will likely be aided by considering the mediating or synergistic influence of multiple lifestyle and health indices alongside brain age.
基于神经影像学的“脑龄”可以识别出脑老化“超前”或“有弹性”的个体。脑预测年龄差异(brain-PAD)可预测认知和身体健康结果。然而,个体健康和生活方式因素如何改变brain-PAD与未来认知或功能表现之间的关系尚不清楚。我们旨在识别出具有弹性或超前brain-PAD的老年人群中与健康相关的亚组,并确定这些亚组的成员身份是否与三到五年内认知和衰弱的变化存在差异关联。
从规模更大的ASPREE(老年人阿司匹林减少事件)试验中招募了326名社区居住的老年人(73.8±3.6岁,42.3%为女性),根据他们的T1加权图像预测brain-PAD。参与者被分为具有弹性(n=159)或超前(n=167)brain-PAD两组,并使用一组认知、生活方式和健康指标进行潜在类别分析(LCA)。我们使用针对年龄、性别和教育程度进行调整的线性混合模型,研究类别成员身份与认知功能的纵向变化以及衰弱缺陷累积指数(FI)之间的关联。
在进行LCA之前,弹性和超前脑老化的亚组在所有特征上具有可比性。在两个脑老化亚组中均识别出两个通常相似的潜在类别:类别1的特征是肥胖患病率低且身体健康状况较好,类别2的特征是心脏代谢、身体和认知健康状况较差。在具有弹性脑老化的人群中,类别1与认知能力下降相关,类别2与5年内认知能力增加相关,不过这是一个较小的效应,相当于每年0.04标准差的差异。在FI方面没有明显的类别差异。对于超前脑老化的人群,没有证据表明类别成员身份与认知或FI的变化之间存在关联。
这些结果表明,脑龄与认知轨迹之间的关系可能会受到其他与健康相关因素的影响。特别是,脑龄有弹性的人根据其基线时的认知和身体健康状况,认知变化轨迹有所不同。未来考虑多种生活方式和健康指标与脑龄的中介或协同影响,可能有助于改进衰老结果的预测模型。