Suppr超能文献

美国多种蓝绿空间衡量指标中的种族、民族和社会经济差异。

Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Multiple Measures of Blue and Green Spaces in the United States.

机构信息

Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 2023 Jan;131(1):17007. doi: 10.1289/EHP11164. Epub 2023 Jan 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several studies have evaluated whether the distribution of natural environments differs between marginalized and privileged neighborhoods. However, most studies restricted their analyses to a single or handful of cities and used different natural environment measures.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated whether natural environments are inequitably distributed based on socioeconomic status (SES) and race/ethnicity in the contiguous United States.

METHODS

We obtained SES and race/ethnicity data (2015-2019) for all U.S. Census tracts. For each tract, we calculated the Normalized Different Vegetation Index (NDVI) for 2020, NatureScore (a proprietary measure of the quantity and quality of natural elements) for 2019, park cover for 2020, and blue space for 1984-2018. We used generalized additive models with adjustment for potential confounders and spatial autocorrelation to evaluate associations of SES and race/ethnicity with NDVI, NatureScore, park cover, and odds of containing blue space in all tracts () and in urban tracts (). To compare effect estimates, we standardized NDVI, NatureScore, and park cover so that beta coefficients presented a percentage increase or decrease of the standard deviation (SD).

RESULTS

Tracts with higher SES had higher NDVI, NatureScore, park cover, and odds of containing blue space. For example, urban tracts in the highest median household income quintile had higher NDVI [44.8% of the SD (95% CI: 42.8, 46.8)] and park cover [16.2% of the SD (95% CI: 13.5, 19.0)] compared with urban tracts in the lowest median household income quintile. Across all tracts, a lower percentage of non-Hispanic White individuals and a higher percentage of Hispanic individuals were associated with lower NDVI and NatureScore. In urban tracts, we observed weak positive associations between percentage non-Hispanic Black and NDVI, NatureScore, and park cover; we did not find any clear associations for percentage Hispanics.

DISCUSSION

Multiple facets of the natural environment are inequitably distributed in the contiguous United States. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11164.

摘要

背景

多项研究评估了自然环境在边缘和特权社区之间的分布是否存在差异。然而,大多数研究将分析仅限于单个或少数几个城市,并使用不同的自然环境衡量标准。

目的

我们评估了自然环境是否根据社会经济地位(SES)和种族/民族在美国大陆的分布存在不平等。

方法

我们获取了所有美国人口普查区的 SES 和种族/民族数据(2015-2019 年)。对于每个区,我们计算了 2020 年的归一化植被指数(NDVI)、2019 年的 NatureScore(一种自然要素数量和质量的专利衡量标准)、2020 年的公园覆盖面积和 1984-2018 年的蓝色空间。我们使用广义加性模型,并对潜在混杂因素和空间自相关进行调整,以评估 SES 和种族/民族与 NDVI、NatureScore、公园覆盖面积以及所有区()和城市区()中包含蓝色空间的可能性之间的关联。为了比较效应估计值,我们将 NDVI、NatureScore 和公园覆盖面积标准化,使得 beta 系数表示标准偏差(SD)的百分比增加或减少。

结果

SES 较高的区具有更高的 NDVI、NatureScore、公园覆盖面积和包含蓝色空间的可能性。例如,收入最高五分位数的城市区的 NDVI 更高[44.8%的 SD(95%CI:42.8,46.8)],公园覆盖面积更高[16.2%的 SD(95%CI:13.5,19.0)],与收入最低五分位数的城市区相比。在所有区中,非西班牙裔白种人比例较低,西班牙裔人比例较高,与 NDVI 和 NatureScore 较低相关。在城市区,我们观察到非西班牙裔黑人比例与 NDVI、NatureScore 和公园覆盖面积之间存在微弱的正相关关系;我们没有发现西班牙裔比例与任何明确的关联。

讨论

在美国大陆,自然环境的多个方面分布不均等。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11164.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b605/9875842/0e7193000a81/ehp11164_f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验