• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

论等级制度、冲突与合作的相互作用:一种实验方法。

On the interplay of hierarchies, conflicts, and cooperation: An experimental approach.

作者信息

Lozano Pablo, Antonioni Alberto, Sánchez Angel

机构信息

Grupo Interdisciplinar de Sistemas Complejos (GISC), Departamento de Matemáticas, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911 Leganés, Madrid, Spain.

Department of Networks and Data Science, Central European University, Quellenstraße 51, A-1100 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

PNAS Nexus. 2022 Dec 7;2(1):pgac283. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac283. eCollection 2023 Jan.

DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac283
PMID:36712929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9837665/
Abstract

Previous research suggests that it is difficult to maintain cooperation in a large society when there is a strong hierarchical structure. In this study, we implement online human experiments to study the effects of exogenous variation in a particular notion of hierarchy on cooperation and conflict within groups. We demonstrate how cooperation can be maintained when collective action is accompanied by dyadic conflicts whose outcome feeds back on the hierarchical rank of the contestants. We find that the majority of individuals take part in conflicts and that highly ranked individuals mostly cooperate and engage in conflicts as a way to punish noncooperators. As a consequence, stable hierarchical groups can arise and maintain high levels of cooperation. Our results are in agreement with the prediction of earlier theoretical models on hierarchical societies and are relevant to understanding the interplay of hierarchy, cooperation, and conflict.

摘要

先前的研究表明,当存在强大的等级结构时,在一个大型社会中维持合作是困难的。在本研究中,我们进行在线人类实验,以研究等级制度这一特定概念的外生变化对群体内合作与冲突的影响。我们证明了,当集体行动伴随着二元冲突,且冲突结果反馈到参与者的等级地位时,合作是如何得以维持的。我们发现,大多数个体参与冲突,并且高等级个体大多会合作,并将参与冲突作为惩罚不合作者的一种方式。因此,稳定的等级群体能够出现并维持高水平的合作。我们的结果与早期关于等级社会的理论模型的预测一致,并且对于理解等级制度、合作与冲突之间的相互作用具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/822a/9837665/b81b78d1d7c8/pgac283fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/822a/9837665/9d8e6890ba51/pgac283fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/822a/9837665/8eec7f1a69e6/pgac283fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/822a/9837665/14cadc454b23/pgac283fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/822a/9837665/f4e9e042ed23/pgac283fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/822a/9837665/b81b78d1d7c8/pgac283fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/822a/9837665/9d8e6890ba51/pgac283fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/822a/9837665/8eec7f1a69e6/pgac283fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/822a/9837665/14cadc454b23/pgac283fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/822a/9837665/f4e9e042ed23/pgac283fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/822a/9837665/b81b78d1d7c8/pgac283fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
On the interplay of hierarchies, conflicts, and cooperation: An experimental approach.论等级制度、冲突与合作的相互作用:一种实验方法。
PNAS Nexus. 2022 Dec 7;2(1):pgac283. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac283. eCollection 2023 Jan.
2
Hierarchy is Detrimental for Human Cooperation.等级制度对人类合作有害。
Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 22;5:18634. doi: 10.1038/srep18634.
3
Collaborative hierarchy maintains cooperation in asymmetric games.协作层级关系维持非对称博弈中的合作。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 29;8(1):5375. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23681-z.
4
Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms.强互惠、人类合作与社会规范的执行
Hum Nat. 2002 Mar;13(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s12110-002-1012-7.
5
Cooperation, Trust, and Antagonism: How Public Goods Are Promoted.合作、信任与对抗:公共物品如何得到促进。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2013 Dec;14(3):119-65. doi: 10.1177/1529100612474436.
6
A theory of leadership in human cooperative groups.人类合作群体中的领导力理论。
J Theor Biol. 2010 Aug 21;265(4):633-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.05.034.
7
Cooperation, social norm internalization, and hierarchical societies.合作、社会规范内化和等级社会。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 21;10(1):15359. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71664-w.
8
Social rank modulates how environmental quality influences cooperation and conflict within animal societies.社会等级调节着环境质量如何影响动物社会中的合作与冲突。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Sep 30;287(1935):20201720. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1720.
9
More 'altruistic' punishment in larger societies.在更大的社会中存在更多“利他性”惩罚。
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Mar 7;275(1634):587-90. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1517.
10
Costly punishment prevails in intergroup conflict.群体间冲突中存在昂贵的惩罚。
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Nov 22;278(1723):3428-36. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0252. Epub 2011 Mar 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Ecological variation and institutionalized inequality in hunter-gatherer societies.狩猎采集社会中的生态变异与制度化不平等。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 30;118(13). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2016134118.
2
Cooperation, social norm internalization, and hierarchical societies.合作、社会规范内化和等级社会。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 21;10(1):15359. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71664-w.
3
How dominance hierarchies emerge from conflict: A game theoretic model and experimental evidence.从冲突中出现的支配等级:一个博弈论模型和实验证据。
Soc Sci Res. 2020 Feb;86:102393. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.102393. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
4
Foresight in a Game of Leadership.领导游戏中的远见。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 10;10(1):2251. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-57562-1.
5
Collaborative hierarchy maintains cooperation in asymmetric games.协作层级关系维持非对称博弈中的合作。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 29;8(1):5375. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23681-z.
6
Collective action and the evolution of social norm internalization.集体行动与社会规范内化的演变。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 6;114(23):6068-6073. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1703857114. Epub 2017 May 22.
7
Hierarchy is Detrimental for Human Cooperation.等级制度对人类合作有害。
Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 22;5:18634. doi: 10.1038/srep18634.
8
Collective action problem in heterogeneous groups.异质群体中的集体行动问题。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Dec 5;370(1683):20150016. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0016.
9
Aggressive behaviour in rats: Effects of winning or losing on subsequent aggressive interactions.大鼠的攻击行为:胜负对后续攻击互动的影响。
Behav Processes. 1982 Jun;7(2):143-55. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(82)90023-7.
10
A solution to the collective action problem in between-group conflict with within-group inequality.群体间冲突中集体行动问题的一个解决方案,该冲突存在群体内部不平等。
Nat Commun. 2014 Mar 26;5:3526. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4526.