Aleluia Reis Lara, Tavoni Massimo
RFF-CMCC European Institute on Economics and the Environment (EIEE), Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici (CMCC), Milan, Italy.
Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
iScience. 2023 Jan 6;26(2):105933. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.105933. eCollection 2023 Feb 17.
In the Glasgow COP26, several major emitters have announced new climate neutrality commitments. Others revised their nationally determined contributions (NDC). The climate, energy, and economic repercussion of these revised pledges is still unclear. Here, using a detailed-process integrated assessment model (WITCH), we analyze the impact of the Glasgow net-zero commitments and compare it to scenarios consistent with the Paris' agreement. We find that-if fully implemented-the Glasgow strategies would help close the gap to 2 C , covering more than 80% of the world's needed emission reductions by 2070. The pledged commitments would exceed 1.5°C, with a temperature increase (50% likelihood) of 1.6 C- 1.8 C by the end of the century. We find that the Glasgow net-zero pledges would require substantial increases in investment in electric transportation and power generation in all major economies. Compared to a scenario with uniform carbon taxation, Glasgow differentiated pledges' do not significantly increase global policy costs, are more fair, and save more lives by promoting cleaner air. However, they delay coal phase-out and increase the need for negative emission technologies.
在格拉斯哥举行的第26届联合国气候变化大会上,几个主要排放国宣布了新的气候中和承诺。其他国家则修订了其国家自主贡献(NDC)。这些修订后的承诺对气候、能源和经济的影响仍不明确。在此,我们使用一个详细过程综合评估模型(WITCH),分析格拉斯哥净零承诺的影响,并将其与符合《巴黎协定》的情景进行比较。我们发现,如果全面实施,格拉斯哥战略将有助于缩小与2摄氏度目标的差距,到2070年涵盖全球所需减排量的80%以上。所承诺的目标将超过1.5摄氏度,到本世纪末气温升高(可能性为50%)将达到1.6摄氏度至1.8摄氏度。我们发现,格拉斯哥的净零承诺将要求所有主要经济体大幅增加对电动交通和发电的投资。与统一碳税情景相比,格拉斯哥的差异化承诺不会显著增加全球政策成本,更公平,并且通过促进空气更清洁而挽救更多生命。然而,它们会推迟煤炭淘汰,并增加对负排放技术的需求。