• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

困难生活情境中的主观评估与取向作为应对策略的预测因素

Subjective Appraisal and Orientations in Difficult Life Situations as Predictors of Coping Strategies.

作者信息

Bityutskaya Ekaterina V, Korneev Aleksey A

机构信息

Faculty of psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

Psychol Russ. 2021 Sep 30;14(3):180-199. doi: 10.11621/pir.2021.0312. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.11621/pir.2021.0312
PMID:36733534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9888047/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many studies have shown that problem-focused coping and a positive reappraisal of one's situation are the most conducive to achieving life goals and psychological well-being, whereas avoidance coping and self-blame have a negative impact on well-being. But there is not enough data on what the predictors of these coping strategies are in the situational context.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the combined influence of subjective appraisal (uncontrollability, unclearness, negative emotions) and orientations in difficult situations (by drive and rejection) on planful problem solving, positive reappraisal, wishful thinking (fantasizing), and self-blame.

DESIGN

The research has a survey design. The sample consisted of 637 adult participants who analyzed difficult situations in their lives associated with achieving significant life goals of various types (N = 637; 60% female; M = 24.2; SD = 6.25). Two alternative structural models were assessed, which include subjective appraisals of the situation (uncontrollability, unclearness, intensity of negative emotions), orientations in difficult situations (drive and rejection), and ways of coping (planful problem-solving, positive reappraisal, wishful thinking, and self-blame).

RESULTS

The first model, in which all cognitive appraisals and orientations in difficult situations directly influence coping strategies, has relatively low fit indices. The second model, in which the influence of cognitive appraisal was partially mediated by orientations in difficult situations, has better fit indices. In life situations involving solution of a difficult task, the strongest predictor of problem-focused coping and positive reappraisal is the "drive" orientation of being attracted to difficulties, which mediates the influence of subjective control and emotions on these ways of coping. An orientation away from difficulties, "rejection," mediates the influence of unclearness and negative emotions on fantasizing and self-blame. A low level of subjective control directly affects self-blame and the avoidance of problem-solving. Negative emotions are a weak predictor of self-blame.

CONCLUSION

Interaction between the subject and the situation involves appraisal of difficulty, which influences orientation in difficult situations. In turn, orientations are predictors of coping strategies. The characteristics of the psychological situation determine coping, which may be oriented toward approach to or avoidance of the goal.

摘要

背景

许多研究表明,以问题为中心的应对方式以及对自身处境的积极重新评价最有助于实现生活目标和心理健康,而回避应对和自我责备则会对幸福感产生负面影响。但关于在情境背景下这些应对策略的预测因素的数据还不够充分。

目的

评估主观评价(不可控性、不清晰性、负面情绪)和在困难情境中的取向(通过驱力和拒绝)对有计划地解决问题、积极重新评价、如意想法(幻想)和自我责备的综合影响。

设计

本研究采用调查设计。样本包括637名成年参与者,他们分析了自己生活中与实现各类重大生活目标相关的困难情境(N = 637;60%为女性;M = 24.2;标准差 = 6.25)。评估了两个替代结构模型,其中包括对情境的主观评价(不可控性、不清晰性、负面情绪强度)、在困难情境中的取向(驱力和拒绝)以及应对方式(有计划地解决问题、积极重新评价、如意想法和自我责备)。

结果

第一个模型中,所有认知评价和在困难情境中的取向直接影响应对策略,其拟合指数相对较低。第二个模型中,认知评价的影响部分由在困难情境中的取向介导,其拟合指数更好。在涉及解决困难任务的生活情境中,以问题为中心的应对方式和积极重新评价的最强预测因素是被困难所吸引的“驱力”取向,它介导了主观控制和情绪对这些应对方式的影响。远离困难的取向“拒绝”介导了不清晰性和负面情绪对幻想和自我责备的影响。低水平的主观控制直接影响自我责备和对解决问题的回避。负面情绪是自我责备的较弱预测因素。

结论

主体与情境之间的相互作用涉及对困难的评价,这会影响在困难情境中的取向。反过来,取向是应对策略的预测因素。心理情境的特征决定应对方式,应对方式可能以接近或回避目标为导向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7204/9888047/2519339feec5/pir-14-03-12-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7204/9888047/74ed9735a285/pir-14-03-12-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7204/9888047/2519339feec5/pir-14-03-12-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7204/9888047/74ed9735a285/pir-14-03-12-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7204/9888047/2519339feec5/pir-14-03-12-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Subjective Appraisal and Orientations in Difficult Life Situations as Predictors of Coping Strategies.困难生活情境中的主观评估与取向作为应对策略的预测因素
Psychol Russ. 2021 Sep 30;14(3):180-199. doi: 10.11621/pir.2021.0312. eCollection 2021.
2
The role of emotion regulation, coping, self-reflection and insight in staff interaction with patients with a diagnosis of personality disorder in forensic settings.情绪调节、应对方式、自我反思和洞察力在法医环境中工作人员与被诊断患有人格障碍的患者互动中的作用。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Nov;25(9-10):582-600. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12506.
3
Cognitive emotion regulation: characteristics and effect on quality of life in women with breast cancer.认知情绪调节:乳腺癌女性的特点及其对生活质量的影响。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 May 6;13:51. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0242-4.
4
Appraisal, coping, emotion, and performance during elite fencing matches: a random coefficient regression model approach.精英击剑比赛中的评估、应对、情绪和表现:一种随机系数回归模型方法。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Sep;27(9):1015-1025. doi: 10.1111/sms.12711. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
5
Stress and personality.压力与个性
Psychiatriki. 2011 Oct-Dec;22(4):290-7.
6
[Multidimensional assessment of coping: validation of the Brief COPE among French population].应对方式的多维评估:法国人群中简易应对方式问卷(Brief COPE)的效度验证
Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):507-18.
7
Coping and subjective burden in caregivers of older relatives: a quantitative systematic review.老年亲属照顾者的应对方式和主观负担:一项定量系统评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2011 Nov;67(11):2311-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05725.x. Epub 2011 Jun 9.
8
Burnout and coping strategies among hospital staff nurses.医院护士的职业倦怠与应对策略
J Adv Nurs. 1989 Jul;14(7):553-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1989.tb01590.x.
9
Coping strategies and stress among resettled Bhutanese adults in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州重新安置的不丹成年人群体的应对策略与压力
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2020;90(4):502-509. doi: 10.1037/ort0000453. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
10
Gender, coping and psychosomatic symptoms.性别、应对方式与身心症状。
Psychol Med. 1990 Feb;20(1):125-35. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700013301.

引用本文的文献

1
Pathogenetic Mechanisms Underlying Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Personality Type D Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Roles of Cognitive Appraisal and Coping Strategies.D型人格患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后主要不良心脏事件的发病机制:认知评估和应对策略的作用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Nov 2;13(21):3374. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13213374.
2
Effects of Cognitive Appraisals on Perceived Self-Efficacy and Distress during the COVID-19 Lockdown: An Empirical Analysis Based on Structural Equation Modeling.认知评价对 COVID-19 封锁期间感知自我效能和困扰的影响:基于结构方程模型的实证分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 28;20(7):5294. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20075294.

本文引用的文献

1
Meaning in Life Predicts Decreased Depressive Symptoms and Increased Positive Affect over Time but Does Not Buffer Stress Effects in a National Sample of African-Americans.生活意义预示着随着时间推移抑郁症状会减少,积极情绪会增加,但在一个非裔美国人全国样本中,它并不能缓冲压力影响。
J Happiness Stud. 2020 Dec;21(8):3037-3049. doi: 10.1007/s10902-019-00212-9. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
2
Coping as a mediator between locus of control, competence beliefs, and mental health: A systematic review and structural equation modelling meta-analysis.应对作为控制源、能力信念和心理健康之间的中介:系统评价和结构方程模型荟萃分析。
Behav Res Ther. 2019 Oct;121:103442. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.103442. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
3
The Emotion Process: Event Appraisal and Component Differentiation.
情绪过程:事件评价与成分区分。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:719-745. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011854. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
4
The description of situations: Towards replicable domains of psychological situation characteristics.情境描述:走向可复制的心理情境特征领域。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Mar;114(3):482-488. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000162.
5
How Power Affects People: Activating, Wanting, and Goal Seeking.权力如何影响人:激活、渴望和目标寻求。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2017 Jan 3;68:353-381. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044153. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
6
Development of the Coping Flexibility Scale: evidence for the coping flexibility hypothesis.应对灵活性量表的编制:对应对灵活性假说的验证。
J Couns Psychol. 2012 Apr;59(2):262-73. doi: 10.1037/a0027770.
7
[The search for meaning in the aftermath of a traumatic event].[创伤事件后的意义探寻]
Sante Ment Que. 2007 Autumn;32(2):11-35. doi: 10.7202/017795ar.
8
Coping: pitfalls and promise.应对:陷阱与希望。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:745-74. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141456.
9
Coping style as a predictor of health and well-being across the first year of medical school.应对方式作为医学院校一年级学生健康与幸福的预测指标。
Health Psychol. 2003 Nov;22(6):627-31. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.22.6.627.
10
Searching for the structure of coping: a review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping.探寻应对方式的结构:应对方式分类范畴系统的综述与批判
Psychol Bull. 2003 Mar;129(2):216-269. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.216.