Roschmann R A, Bell C L
Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison 53792.
Am J Med. 1987 Oct;83(4):661-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90895-3.
A retrospective analysis of 29 patients with septic bursitis was undertaken to ascertain if immunocompromised patients differed in their clinical presentations, type of organisms cultured, and outcome when compared with their non-immunocompromised cohorts. Thirty episodes of septic bursitis occurred in 29 patients, 43 percent of which occurred in immunocompromised patients. Despite similar clinical presentations, the bursae of immunocompromised patients took three times longer to sterilize and had a much higher bursal white blood cell count when compared with the bursae of non-immunocompromised patients. The bacteriologic spectrum was essentially identical in both groups; there were no cases in which gram-negative organisms were recovered from infected bursae. No cases of septic bursitis were seen in neutropenic patients. The most common factors contributing to an immunocompromised state were alcoholism or steroid therapy. A successful resolution of septic bursitis was seen in all the patients in the immunocompromised groups.
对29例脓毒性滑囊炎患者进行了回顾性分析,以确定免疫功能低下患者与非免疫功能低下患者相比,在临床表现、培养出的微生物类型及预后方面是否存在差异。29例患者共发生30次脓毒性滑囊炎发作,其中43%发生在免疫功能低下患者中。尽管临床表现相似,但与非免疫功能低下患者的滑囊相比,免疫功能低下患者的滑囊杀菌时间延长了两倍,滑囊白细胞计数也高得多。两组的细菌谱基本相同;未出现从感染滑囊中分离出革兰氏阴性菌的病例。中性粒细胞减少患者未出现脓毒性滑囊炎病例。导致免疫功能低下状态的最常见因素是酗酒或类固醇治疗。免疫功能低下组的所有患者脓毒性滑囊炎均成功治愈。