Quality of radiomics for predicting microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

To comprehensively evaluate the reporting quality, risk of bias, and radiomics methodology quality of radiomics models for predicting microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

A systematic search of available literature was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library up to January 21, 2022. Studies that developed and/or validated machine learning models based on radiomics data to predict microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma were included. These studies were reviewed by two investigators and the consensus data were used for analyzing. The reporting quality, risk of bias, and radiomics methodological quality were evaluated by Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD), Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool, and Radiomics Quality Score (RQS), respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 30 studies met eligibility criteria with 24 model developing studies and 6 model developing and external validation studies. The median overall TRIPOD adherence was 75.4% (range 56.7-94.3%). All studies were at high risk of bias with at least 2 of 20 sources of bias. Furthermore, 28 studies showed unclear risks of bias in up to 5 signaling questions because of the lack of specified reports. The median RQS score was 37.5% (range 25-61.1%).

CONCLUSION

Current radiomic models for MVI-status prediction have moderate to good reporting quality, moderate radiomics methodology quality, and high risk of bias in model development and validation.

KEY POINTS

• Current microvascular invasion prediction radiomics studies have moderate to good reporting quality, moderate radiomics methodology quality, and high risk of bias in model development and validation. • Data representativeness, feature robustness, events-per-variable ratio, evaluation metrics, and appropriate validation are five main aspects futures studies should focus more on to improve the quality of radiomics. • Both Radiomics Quality Score and Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool are needed to comprehensively evaluate a radiomics study.