Mandalaywala Tara M, Gonzalez Gorana, Tropp Linda R
University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA.
Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2023 Jan;26(1):48-70. doi: 10.1177/13684302211049721.
Anecdotal reports suggested an uptick in anti-Asian prejudice corresponding with the initial outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Examining responses from White U.S. citizens ( = 589) during the first months of the pandemic, this study tested: (a) whether actual intensity (official number of cases or deaths reported) or perceived intensity (participants' estimates of the same) of the COVID-19 outbreak predicted indicators of racial outgroup prejudice, particularly those associated with cross-group interaction, (b) whether outgroup prejudice was oriented toward Asian people specifically, or toward racial outgroups more broadly (e.g., toward both Asian people and Black people), and (c) whether contact with racial outgroups moderated relations between COVID-19 intensity and racial prejudice. Results showed that perceived COVID-19 intensity was associated with prejudice indicators representing the desire for social distance from Asian people, as well as from Black people, yet it was unrelated to reports of negative affect toward either racial outgroup. These patterns support the idea that prejudice during periods of disease outbreak might functionally serve to reduce willingness for interaction with, and likelihood of infection from, racial outgroups. Contact moderated the relation between official reports of COVID-19 intensity and support for anti-China travel policies, such that greater contact with Asian people was associated with less support for exclusionary, anti-China travel policies when actual COVID-19 intensity was high. Overall, these results suggest that intensity of disease threat can exacerbate racial outgroup prejudice and reduce willingness for cross-group interaction, but that intergroup contact may sometimes provide a prejudice-attenuating effect.
轶事报告表明,随着新冠疫情的首次爆发,反亚裔偏见有所增加。本研究调查了美国白人公民(=589人)在疫情最初几个月的反应,测试了:(a)新冠疫情的实际严重程度(官方报告的病例数或死亡数)或感知严重程度(参与者对同一情况的估计)是否能预测种族外群体偏见指标,特别是那些与跨群体互动相关的指标;(b)外群体偏见是否专门针对亚洲人,还是更广泛地针对种族外群体(例如,针对亚洲人和黑人);以及(c)与种族外群体的接触是否缓和了新冠疫情严重程度与种族偏见之间的关系。结果显示,感知到的新冠疫情严重程度与代表与亚洲人以及黑人保持社会距离愿望的偏见指标相关,但与对任何一个种族外群体的负面影响报告无关。这些模式支持了这样一种观点,即在疾病爆发期间,偏见可能在功能上起到减少与种族外群体互动意愿以及感染可能性的作用。接触缓和了新冠疫情严重程度的官方报告与支持反华旅行政策之间的关系,即在实际新冠疫情严重程度较高时,与亚洲人有更多接触与对排他性反华旅行政策的支持减少相关。总体而言,这些结果表明,疾病威胁的严重程度会加剧种族外群体偏见并降低跨群体互动意愿,但群体间接触有时可能会产生减轻偏见的效果。