Glässnerová K, Sklenář F, Jurjević Ž, Houbraken J, Yaguchi T, Visagie C M, Gené J, Siqueira J P Z, Kubátová A, Kolařík M, Hubka V
Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Laboratory of Fungal Genetics and Metabolism, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Stud Mycol. 2022 Dec;102:1-51. doi: 10.3114/sim.2022.102.01. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
section encompasses white- or yellow-sporulating species mostly isolated from indoor and cave environments, food, feed, clinical material, soil and dung. Their identification is non-trivial due to largely uniform morphology. This study aims to re-evaluate the species boundaries in the section and present an overview of all existing species along with information on their ecology. For the analyses, we assembled a set of 113 strains with diverse origin. For the molecular analyses, we used DNA sequences of three house-keeping genes (, and ) and employed species delimitation methods based on a multispecies coalescent model. Classical phylogenetic methods and genealogical concordance phylogenetic species recognition (GCPSR) approaches were used for comparison. Phenotypic studies involved comparisons of macromorphology on four cultivation media, seven micromorphological characters and growth at temperatures ranging from 10 to 45 °C. Based on the integrative approach comprising four criteria (phylogenetic and phenotypic), all currently accepted species gained support, while two new species are proposed ( and ). In addition, we proposed the new name to replace an invalidly described . The revised section now encompasses nine species, some of which manifest a high level of intraspecific genetic and/or phenotypic variability (, and ) while others are more uniform (, or ). The growth rates on different media and at different temperatures, colony colours, production of soluble pigments, stipe dimensions and vesicle diameters contributed the most to the phenotypic species differentiation. Glässnerová & Hubka; Glässnerová & Hubka; Houbraken, Glässnerová & Hubka. Glässnerová K, Sklenář F, Jurjević Ž, Houbraken J, Yaguchi T, Visagie CM, Gené J, Siqueira JPZ, Kubátová A, Kolařík M, Hubka V (2022). A monograph of section . : 1-51. doi: 10.3114/sim.2022.102.01.
该组包含大多从室内和洞穴环境、食物、饲料、临床材料、土壤和粪便中分离出的产白色或黄色孢子的物种。由于其形态在很大程度上较为一致,对它们的鉴定并非易事。本研究旨在重新评估该组中的物种界限,并概述所有现有物种及其生态信息。为进行分析,我们收集了一组来源多样的113株菌株。对于分子分析,我们使用了三个管家基因(、和)的DNA序列,并采用基于多物种溯祖模型的物种界定方法。使用经典系统发育方法和谱系一致性系统发育物种识别(GCPSR)方法进行比较。表型研究包括在四种培养基上对宏观形态、七个微观形态特征以及在10至45°C温度范围内的生长情况进行比较。基于包含四个标准(系统发育和表型)的综合方法,所有目前被接受的物种都得到了支持,同时提出了两个新物种(和)。此外,我们提出了新名称来取代一个描述无效的名称。修订后的该组现在包含九个物种,其中一些表现出高水平的种内遗传和/或表型变异性(、和),而其他物种则更为一致(、或)。在不同培养基和不同温度下的生长速率、菌落颜色、可溶性色素的产生、菌柄尺寸和泡囊直径对表型物种分化贡献最大。 格拉斯纳罗娃和胡布卡;格拉斯纳罗娃和胡布卡;胡布拉肯、格拉斯纳罗娃和胡布卡。格拉斯纳罗娃K、斯克莱纳尔F、尤尔耶维奇Ž、胡布拉肯J、矢口T、维萨吉CM、热内J、西凯拉JPZ、库巴托娃A、科拉里克M、胡布卡V(2022年)。组的专论。:1 - 51。doi:10.3114/sim.2022.102.01 。