Sklenář F, Jurjević Ž, Houbraken J, Kolařík M, Arendrup M C, Jørgensen K M, Siqueira J P Z, Gené J, Yaguchi T, Ezekiel C N, Silva Pereira C, Hubka V
Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Laboratory of Fungal Genetics and Metabolism, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Stud Mycol. 2021 Dec 16;99:100120. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2021.100120. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Since the last revision in 2015, the taxonomy of section evolved rapidly along with the availability of new species delimitation techniques. This study aims to re-evaluate the species boundaries of section members using modern delimitation methods applied to an extended set of strains (n = 90) collected from various environments. The analysis used DNA sequences of three house-keeping genes (, , ) and consisted of two steps: application of several single-locus (GMYC, bGMYC, PTP, bPTP) and multi-locus (STACEY) species delimitation methods to sort the isolates into putative species, which were subsequently validated using DELINEATE software that was applied for the first time in fungal taxonomy. As a result, four new species are introduced, , , and , and is synonymized with . Phenotypic analyses were performed for the new species and their relatives, and the results showed that the growth parameters at different temperatures and colonies characteristics were useful for differentiation of these taxa. The revised section harbors 18 species, most of them are known from soil. However, the most common species from the section are ecologically diverse, occurring in the indoor environment (six species), clinical samples (five species), food and feed (four species), droppings (four species) and other less common substrates/environments. Due to the occurrence of section species in the clinical material/hospital environment, we also evaluated the susceptibility of 67 strains to six antifungals (amphotericin B, itraconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole, isavuconazole, terbinafine) using the reference EUCAST method. These results showed some potentially clinically relevant differences in susceptibility between species. For example, MICs higher than those observed for wild-type were found for both triazoles and amphotericin B for and whereas and were comparable to or more susceptible as . Finally, terbinafine was active against all species except .
自2015年上次修订以来,随着新物种界定技术的出现,该组的分类学发展迅速。本研究旨在使用现代界定方法,对从各种环境中收集的一组扩展菌株(n = 90)重新评估该组成员的物种界限。分析使用了三个管家基因(,,)的DNA序列,包括两个步骤:应用几种单基因座(GMYC、bGMYC、PTP、bPTP)和多基因座(STACEY)物种界定方法将分离株分类为假定物种,随后使用首次应用于真菌分类学的DELINEATE软件进行验证。结果,引入了四个新物种,,和,并且与同义。对新物种及其亲缘种进行了表型分析,结果表明不同温度下的生长参数和菌落特征有助于区分这些分类群。修订后的该组包含18个物种,其中大多数来自土壤。然而,该组中最常见的物种在生态上具有多样性,出现在室内环境(6种)、临床样本(5种)、食品和饲料(4种)、粪便(4种)以及其他不太常见的底物/环境中。由于该组物种在临床材料/医院环境中的出现,我们还使用参考的EUCAST方法评估了67株菌株对六种抗真菌药物(两性霉素B、伊曲康唑、泊沙康唑、伏立康唑、艾沙康唑、特比萘芬)的敏感性。这些结果显示了物种之间在敏感性方面一些潜在的临床相关差异。例如,对于和,三唑类药物和两性霉素B的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)高于野生型的观察值,而和与相当或比更敏感。最后,特比萘芬对除以外的所有物种均有活性。