• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Developing a machine learning algorithm to predict probability of retear and functional outcomes in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair surgery: protocol for a retrospective, multicentre study.开发机器学习算法预测行肩袖修复手术患者再撕裂和功能结局的概率:一项回顾性、多中心研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 10;13(2):e063673. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063673.
2
Development and training of a machine learning algorithm to identify patients at risk for recurrence following an arthroscopic Bankart repair (CLEARER): protocol for a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study.机器学习算法的开发和训练,以识别关节镜下 Bankart 修复术后(CLEARER)复发风险患者:一项回顾性、多中心队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 8;12(9):e055346. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055346.
3
Developing a machine learning algorithm to predict the probability of aseptic loosening of the glenoid component after anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty: protocol for a retrospective, multicentre study.开发一种机器学习算法预测解剖型全肩关节置换术后肩盂组件无菌性松动的概率:一项回顾性、多中心研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 18;13(10):e074700. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074700.
4
Clinical and radiological evaluation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using suture bridge technique.关节镜下缝合桥技术修复肩袖损伤的临床和影像学评估。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2013 Dec;5(4):306-13. doi: 10.4055/cios.2013.5.4.306. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
5
Clinical outcome and repair integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair significantly improved during the surgeon's learning curve.关节镜肩袖修复术后的临床结果和修复完整性在外科医生的学习曲线期间显著改善。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Aug;30(8):1881-1890. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.031. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
6
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a suture bridge technique: is the repair integrity actually maintained?关节镜下缝合桥技术修复肩袖撕裂:修复的完整性是否得到维持?
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Oct;39(10):2108-16. doi: 10.1177/0363546510397171. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
7
Anteroposterior tear size, age, hospital, and case number are important predictors of repair integrity: an analysis of 1962 consecutive arthroscopic single-row rotator cuff repairs.肩袖修补术的前-后撕裂大小、年龄、医院和病例数是修复完整性的重要预测指标:对 1962 例连续关节镜下单排肩袖修补术的分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Aug;30(8):1907-1914. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.038. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
8
Factors Predictive of Healing in Large Rotator Cuff Tears: Is It Possible to Predict Retear Preoperatively?大肩袖撕裂愈合的预测因素:术前能否预测再撕裂?
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jun;46(7):1693-1700. doi: 10.1177/0363546518762386. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
9
Large Critical Shoulder Angle Has Higher Risk of Tendon Retear After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.大的临界肩角在关节镜肩袖修复后有更高的肌腱再撕裂风险。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(8):1892-1900. doi: 10.1177/0363546518767634. Epub 2018 May 3.
10
Combination of risk factors affecting retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a decision tree analysis.关节镜下肩袖修复术后再撕裂的影响因素分析:决策树分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jan;30(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
A narrative review of the use of PROMs and machine learning to impact value-based clinical decision-making.关于使用患者报告结局测量信息(PROMs)和机器学习来影响基于价值的临床决策的叙述性综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03083-8.
2
Advancements in the diagnosis and management of rotator cuff tears. The role of artificial intelligence.肩袖撕裂诊断与管理的进展。人工智能的作用。
J Orthop. 2023 Nov 8;47:87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.11.011. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Approaching Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedics: Predictive Analytics and Machine Learning to Prognosticate Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Surgical Outcomes.骨科领域中的人工智能应用:利用预测分析和机器学习预测关节镜下肩袖手术结果
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 19;12(6):2369. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062369.

本文引用的文献

1
Missing data is poorly handled and reported in prediction model studies using machine learning: a literature review.机器学习预测模型研究中对缺失数据的处理和报告很差劲:文献综述。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Feb;142:218-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.11.023. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
2
Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Second Primary Lung Cancer.中文译文:第二原发性肺癌风险预测模型的建立与验证。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Jan 11;114(1):87-96. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab138.
3
Risk factors affecting rotator cuff retear after arthroscopic repair: a meta-analysis and systematic review.关节镜修复术后影响肩袖再撕裂的危险因素:一项荟萃分析和系统评价
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Nov;30(11):2660-2670. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.05.010. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
4
A Machine Learning Algorithm to Identify Patients with Tibial Shaft Fractures at Risk for Infection After Operative Treatment.一种机器学习算法,用于识别接受手术治疗的胫骨骨干骨折患者发生感染的风险。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Mar 17;103(6):532-540. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00903.
5
Complications Within 6 Months After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Registry-Based Evaluation According to a Core Event Set and Severity Grading.关节镜肩袖修复术后 6 个月内的并发症:根据核心事件集和严重程度分级的基于登记的评估。
Arthroscopy. 2021 Jan;37(1):50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.08.010. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
6
Long-term Results of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Follow-up Study Comparing Single-Row Versus Double-Row Fixation Techniques.关节镜肩袖修复的长期结果:单排与双排固定技术的随访比较研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jun;48(7):1568-1574. doi: 10.1177/0363546520919120. Epub 2020 May 11.
7
Does the Use of Knotted Versus Knotless Transosseous Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair Technique Influence the Incidence of Retears? A Systematic Review.采用结节与非结节经骨等效肩袖修复技术是否会影响撕裂的发生率?系统评价。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jun;36(6):1738-1746. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.01.052. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
8
Rotator Cuff Retears.肩袖撕裂。
JBJS Rev. 2020 Jan;8(1):e0039. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.19.00039.
9
Surgical repair conservative treatment and subacromial decompression for the treatment of rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.手术修复与保守治疗及肩峰下减压治疗肩袖撕裂的比较:一项随机试验的荟萃分析。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Sep;101-B(9):1100-1106. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B9.BJJ-2018-1591.R1.
10
Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Shoulder Outcome Measures and Diagnoses: A Systematic Review.肩评估与诊断的最小临床重要差异:系统评价。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Aug;98(8):671-676. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001169.

开发机器学习算法预测行肩袖修复手术患者再撕裂和功能结局的概率:一项回顾性、多中心研究方案。

Developing a machine learning algorithm to predict probability of retear and functional outcomes in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair surgery: protocol for a retrospective, multicentre study.

机构信息

Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinique Générale Annecy, Annecy, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France

Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 10;13(2):e063673. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063673.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063673
PMID:36764713
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9923257/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The effectiveness of rotator cuff tear repair surgery is influenced by multiple patient-related, pathology-centred and technical factors, which is thought to contribute to the reported retear rates between 17% and 94%. Adequate patient selection is thought to be essential in reaching satisfactory results. However, no clear consensus has been reached on which factors are most predictive of successful surgery. A clinical decision tool that encompassed all aspects is still to be made. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms use complex self-learning models that can be used to make patient-specific decision-making tools. The aim of this study is to develop and train an algorithm that can be used as an online available clinical prediction tool, to predict the risk of retear in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study using pooled individual patient data from multiple studies of patients who have undergone rotator cuff repair and were evaluated by advanced imaging for healing at a minimum of 6 months after surgery. This study consists of two parts. Part one: collecting all potential factors that might influence retear risks from retrospective multicentre data, aiming to include more than 1000 patients worldwide. Part two: combining all influencing factors into a model that can clinically be used as a prediction tool using machine learning.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

For safe multicentre data exchange and analysis, our Machine Learning Consortium adheres to the WHO regulation 'Policy on Use and Sharing of Data Collected by WHO in Member States Outside the Context of Public Health Emergencies'. The study results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Institutional Review Board approval does not apply to the current study protocol.

摘要

简介

肩袖撕裂修复手术的效果受多种与患者相关、以病理为中心和技术因素的影响,这被认为是导致报告的再撕裂率在 17%至 94%之间的原因。充分的患者选择被认为是达到满意结果的关键。然而,对于哪些因素最能预测手术的成功,目前仍未达成明确共识。一种包含所有方面的临床决策工具仍有待制定。人工智能(AI)和机器学习算法使用复杂的自我学习模型,可用于制定针对特定患者的决策工具。本研究旨在开发和训练一种算法,可作为在线临床预测工具,预测接受肩袖修复的患者再撕裂的风险。

方法和分析

这是一项回顾性、多中心队列研究,使用来自多个肩袖修复患者的多中心研究的 pooled 个体患者数据,这些患者在手术后至少 6 个月通过先进的影像学检查评估愈合情况。本研究包括两部分。第一部分:从回顾性多中心数据中收集所有可能影响再撕裂风险的潜在因素,目标是纳入全球超过 1000 名患者。第二部分:将所有影响因素结合到一个模型中,该模型可以通过机器学习在临床上用作预测工具。

伦理和传播

为了安全地进行多中心数据交换和分析,我们的机器学习联盟遵守世界卫生组织关于“在非突发公共卫生事件情况下,世卫组织会员国使用和共享数据的政策”的规定。研究结果将通过在同行评议的期刊上发表来传播。本研究方案不需要机构审查委员会的批准。