Suppr超能文献

如果建造了,他们会来吗?南非开普敦城市公园升级、公园使用与基于公园的身体活动——阳光研究。

If You Build It Will They Come? Park Upgrades, Park Use and Park-Based Physical Activity in Urban Cape Town, South Africa-The SUN Study.

机构信息

Research Centre for Health through Physical Activity, Lifestyle and Sport (HPALS), Division of Physiological Sciences, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7700, South Africa.

Department of Sport, Recreation and Exercise Science, Faculty of Community and Health Science, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town 7535, South Africa.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 31;20(3):2574. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032574.

Abstract

The development and upgrade of recreational public spaces are key government strategies to increase opportunities for physical activity (PA) and enhance social interaction and community cohesion. This study aimed to evaluate differences in park use and park-based PA in recently upgraded/developed parks (intervention, = 4) against established parks (control, = 4) and in regional parks in high- and low-income settings ( = 2). Additionally, associations between target area features, park use and PA were identified. Direct observation of park use and attributes was conducted using the System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC) over four months. Despite more park users in intervention parks (2519 vs. 1432), control park visitors were 48% more likely to be engaged in PA ( < 0.001). Similarly, while high-income park users attracted more visitors (2135 vs. 1111), they were 79% less likely to be engaged in any PA compared with low-income park visitors. The likelihood of both use of and PA by gender and age differed by features. Active recreation features in intervention parks attracted more users than the same features in control parks. In this study, upgraded or newly developed parks attracted more visitors but not necessarily overall greater levels of physical activity.

摘要

休闲公共空间的发展和升级是政府增加体育活动(PA)机会、促进社会互动和增强社区凝聚力的关键策略。本研究旨在评估最近升级/开发的公园(干预组,n=4)与已建立的公园(对照组,n=4)以及高收入和低收入地区的区域公园(n=2)在公园使用和基于公园的 PA 方面的差异。此外,还确定了目标区域特征、公园使用和 PA 之间的关联。使用社区娱乐观察系统(SOPARC)在四个月内对公园使用和属性进行了直接观察。尽管干预公园的公园使用者(2519 人)多于对照组公园(1432 人),但对照组公园游客参与 PA 的可能性高出 48%(<0.001)。同样,虽然高收入公园的使用者更多(2135 人),但与低收入公园的使用者相比,他们参与任何 PA 的可能性低 79%。性别和年龄的使用和 PA 的可能性因特征而异。干预公园的积极娱乐设施比对照组公园的相同设施吸引了更多的使用者。在这项研究中,升级或新开发的公园吸引了更多的游客,但不一定能带来更高水平的总体身体活动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e5c/9916099/626c21451a02/ijerph-20-02574-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验