• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

害群之马破坏了这个比喻?自私自利的领导者如何以及为何会在工作中引发适得其反的行为。

Bad apples spoiling the metaphor? How and why self-serving leaders stir up counterproductive behaviors at work.

作者信息

Zhang Yajun, Peng Shuai, Wang Jinsong, Akhtar Muhammad Naseer, Wang Yongqi

机构信息

School of Business Administration, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, China.

Royal Docks School of Business and Law, University of East London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 26;13:1008071. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1008071. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1008071
PMID:36778174
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9908574/
Abstract

Self-serving leaders satisfy their self-interests at the cost of both employees and organizations, leading to declining organizational competitive advantage and performance. Drawing upon the affective events theory (AET), we constructed and examined a theoretical model of self-serving leadership influencing counterproductive work behavior (CWB), where traditionality plays a significant moderating role through the lens of anger as a mediator. Data were collected in three waves using a survey questionnaire distributed in three industries located in the Southwest district of China. Hierarchical regression analyses were conducted on a sample of 316 employees to test the hypothesized research model. The results showed that self-serving leadership triggers employee anger, which in turn causes CWB. Furthermore, traditionality plays a significant moderating role, in which employees with higher levels of traditionality feel less anger and show less CWB. Overall, research findings have clarified how and why self-serving leadership affects employees' emotions (such as anger) and behavior (such as CWB), bringing new insights into the self-serving leadership and employee behavior literature. Research implications on the management of self-serving leadership, limitations, and future recommendations of research are also discussed.

摘要

自利型领导者以牺牲员工和组织为代价来满足自身利益,导致组织竞争优势和绩效下降。基于情感事件理论(AET),我们构建并检验了一个自利型领导影响反生产工作行为(CWB)的理论模型,其中传统性通过愤怒这一中介变量发挥显著的调节作用。我们采用调查问卷的方式,分三个阶段在中国西南地区的三个行业收集数据。对316名员工的样本进行了分层回归分析,以检验所提出的研究模型。结果表明,自利型领导引发员工愤怒,进而导致反生产工作行为。此外,传统性发挥了显著的调节作用,传统性水平较高的员工愤怒感较低,反生产工作行为也较少。总体而言,研究结果阐明了自利型领导如何以及为何影响员工的情绪(如愤怒)和行为(如反生产工作行为),为自利型领导和员工行为的文献带来了新的见解。同时,还讨论了关于自利型领导管理的研究启示、局限性以及未来研究建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0598/9908574/b56b60d05058/fpsyg-13-1008071-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0598/9908574/a7c62f9e0238/fpsyg-13-1008071-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0598/9908574/b56b60d05058/fpsyg-13-1008071-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0598/9908574/a7c62f9e0238/fpsyg-13-1008071-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0598/9908574/b56b60d05058/fpsyg-13-1008071-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Bad apples spoiling the metaphor? How and why self-serving leaders stir up counterproductive behaviors at work.害群之马破坏了这个比喻?自私自利的领导者如何以及为何会在工作中引发适得其反的行为。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 26;13:1008071. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1008071. eCollection 2022.
2
Influence of meaningfulness of work and leadership characteristics on customer-directed counterproductive work behavior resulting from customer mistreatment.工作意义和领导特质对因顾客虐待导致的针对顾客的反生产工作行为的影响。
J Soc Psychol. 2025 Mar 4;165(2):227-255. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2024.2361748. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
3
The Influence of Self-Serving Leadership on Deviant Behaviors in the Workplace: A Moderated Mediation Model.自利型领导对职场越轨行为的影响:一个有调节的中介模型
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 5;13:825154. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.825154. eCollection 2022.
4
Humor at work that works: A multi-level examination of when and why leader humor promotes employee creativity.工作中起作用的幽默:对领导幽默何时以及为何能促进员工创造力的多层次考察。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 1;13:903281. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903281. eCollection 2022.
5
Envy and Counterproductive Work Behavior: The Moderation Role of Leadership in Public and Private Organizations.嫉妒与反生产工作行为:公共和私营组织中领导的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 10;15(7):1455. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071455.
6
Family Supportive Leadership and Counterproductive Work Behavior: The Roles of Work-Family Conflict, Moral Disengagement and Personal Life Attribution.家庭支持型领导与反生产工作行为:工作-家庭冲突、道德推脱和个人生活归因的作用
Front Psychol. 2022 May 27;13:906877. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.906877. eCollection 2022.
7
The Role of Leader-Member Exchange Relations and Individual Differences on Counterproductive Work Behavior.领导-成员交换关系和个体差异对反生产工作行为的作用。
Psychol Rep. 2024 Aug;127(4):2050-2086. doi: 10.1177/0033294121989298. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
8
Exploring the Impact of Leadership Characteristics on Subordinates' Counterproductive Work Behavior: From the Organizational Cultural Psychology Perspective.从组织文化心理学视角探究领导特质对下属反生产工作行为的影响
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 18;13:818509. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.818509. eCollection 2022.
9
Counterproductive Work Behavior in Russian Nanotechnology Organizations.俄罗斯纳米技术组织中的反生产工作行为
Psychol Russ. 2021 Mar 31;14(1):49-68. doi: 10.11621/pir.2021.0105. eCollection 2021.
10
The impact of emotional leadership on Chinese subordinates' work engagement: role of intrinsic motivation and traditionality.情绪型领导对中国下属工作投入的影响:内在动机和传统性的作用。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Dec 31;10(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-01022-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Workplace Ostracism and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Chain Mediating Role of Anger and Turnover Intention.职场排斥与反生产工作行为:愤怒与离职意愿的链式中介作用
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 8;12:761560. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.761560. eCollection 2021.
2
No Regard for Those Who Need It: The Moderating Role of Follower Self-Esteem in the Relationship Between Leader Psychopathy and Leader Self-Serving Behavior.对有需要者的漠视:追随者自尊在领导者精神病态与领导者自利行为关系中的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 24;9:1281. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01281. eCollection 2018.
3
Understanding cycles of abuse: A multimotive approach.
理解虐待周期:一种多动机方法。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Nov;100(6):1798-810. doi: 10.1037/apl0000031. Epub 2015 May 25.
4
Third parties' reactions to the abusive supervision of coworkers.第三方对同事虐待式监管的反应。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jul;100(4):1040-1055. doi: 10.1037/apl0000002. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
5
Does power corrupt or enable? When and why power facilitates self-interested behavior.权力使人腐败还是使人有能力?权力何时以及为何会助长自利行为。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 May;97(3):681-9. doi: 10.1037/a0026811. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
6
Can "good" stressors spark "bad" behaviors? The mediating role of emotions in links of challenge and hindrance stressors with citizenship and counterproductive behaviors.良性压力源会引发不良行为吗?情绪在挑战和阻碍压力源与公民行为和反生产行为之间的联系中的中介作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Nov;94(6):1438-51. doi: 10.1037/a0016752.
7
Anger is an approach-related affect: evidence and implications.愤怒是一种与趋近相关的情感:证据及启示。
Psychol Bull. 2009 Mar;135(2):183-204. doi: 10.1037/a0013965.
8
Abusive supervision and family undermining as displaced aggression.作为替代性攻击的辱骂性监督和家庭破坏行为。
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Sep;91(5):1125-33. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1125.