Suppr超能文献

脊柱侧弯非手术治疗中使用的患者报告结局量表清单:一项范围综述

Inventory of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in the Non-Operative Care of Scoliosis: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Parent Eric C, Vaclavik Matthew, Bourgoin Cody, Hebert Courtney, Bouwmeester Megan, Cheslock Sarah, Collins Rebecca, Potgieter Stefan, Coles Mark, Schreiber Sanja, Donzelli Sabrina, Warner Camille

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, 2-50 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G4, Canada.

The Foundation for Student Science and Technology, Ottawa, ON K1P 5J3, Canada.

出版信息

Children (Basel). 2023 Jan 29;10(2):239. doi: 10.3390/children10020239.

Abstract

It is unclear which patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can assess non-operative care for scoliosis. Most existing tools aim to assess the effects of surgery. This scoping review aimed to inventory the PROMs used to assess non-operative scoliosis treatment by population and languages. We searched Medline (OVID) as per COSMIN guidelines. Studies were included if patients were diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis or adult degenerative scoliosis and used PROMs. Studies without quantitative data or reporting on fewer than 10 participants were excluded. Nine reviewers extracted the PROMs used, the population(s), language(s), and study setting(s). We screened 3724 titles and abstracts. Of these, the full texts of 900 articles were assessed. Data were extracted from 488 studies, in which 145 PROMs were identified across 22 languages and 5 populations (Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis, Adult Degenerative Scoliosis, Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis, Adult Spine Deformity, and an Unclear category). Overall, the most used PROMs were the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, 37.3%), Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22, 34.8%), and the Short Form-36 (SF-36, 20.1%), but the frequency varied by population. It is now necessary to determine the PROMs that demonstrate the best measurement properties in the non-operative treatment of scoliosis to include in a core set of outcomes.

摘要

目前尚不清楚哪些患者报告结局指标(PROMs)可用于评估脊柱侧弯的非手术治疗。现有的大多数工具旨在评估手术效果。本范围综述旨在按人群和语言列出用于评估脊柱侧弯非手术治疗的PROMs。我们按照COSMIN指南检索了Medline(OVID)。如果患者被诊断为特发性脊柱侧弯或成人退变性脊柱侧弯且使用了PROMs,则纳入研究。排除没有定量数据或报告参与者少于10人的研究。9名评审员提取了所使用的PROMs、人群、语言和研究环境。我们筛选了3724篇标题和摘要。其中,评估了900篇文章的全文。从488项研究中提取了数据,在这些研究中,共识别出145种PROMs,涉及22种语言和5类人群(青少年特发性脊柱侧弯、成人退变性脊柱侧弯、成人特发性脊柱侧弯、成人脊柱畸形和一个不明确类别)。总体而言,使用最多的PROMs是Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI,37.3%)、脊柱侧弯研究学会-22(SRS-22,34.8%)和简明健康调查问卷-36(SF-36,20.1%),但使用频率因人群而异。现在有必要确定在脊柱侧弯非手术治疗中表现出最佳测量属性的PROMs,以纳入核心结局指标集。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9733/9954663/25acffd67769/children-10-00239-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验