• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

远紫外线辐射用于手部或手套消毒?

Far-UVC Radiation for Disinfecting Hands or Gloves?

作者信息

Hessling Martin, Sicks Ben, Lau Bernhard

机构信息

Institute of Medical Engineering and Mechatronics, Ulm University of Applied Sciences, Albert-Einstein-Allee 55, D-89081 Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Pathogens. 2023 Jan 29;12(2):213. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12020213.

DOI:10.3390/pathogens12020213
PMID:36839485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9963788/
Abstract

(1) Background: Far-UVC radiation in the spectral range 200-230 nm has, according to previous findings, a strong antimicrobial effect on pathogens, but exhibits hardly any harmful effect on human skin. Therefore, the present study will discuss whether such radiation could also be suitable for hand disinfection in the healthcare sector. (2) Methods: Hands and gloves were microbially contaminated and exposed to radiation from a 222 nm krypton-chloride-excimer lamp. The applied doses were 23 mJ/cm and 100 mJ/cm, respectively. Irradiated and non-irradiated hands and gloves were pressed onto agar plates and colonies were counted and compared after 24 h of incubation. For comparison, we also treated hands and gloves with a commercial liquid alcohol-based disinfectant. (3) Results: On the hand, the 23 mJ/cm resulted in the reduction of the observed colonies on the agar plates by one log level. For the gloves irradiated with 100 mJ/cm, a colony reduction of 1.3 log levels was recorded. In the comparative experiments with the commercial disinfectant, a colony reduction of 1.9 and approximately one log level was observed on hand and gloves, respectively. (4) Conclusion: In both cases, far-UVC radiation provided a considerable reduction in microorganisms. However, compared to published far-UVC irradiation results in suspensions, the disinfection success on hands and gloves was rather low. With regard to the irradiation limits currently existing in the European Union, multiple daily hand disinfection with far-UVC radiation is actually legally not possible at present, but the thresholds are currently under discussion and could change in the future. Far-UVC disinfection of hands in gloves seems theoretically possible if attention is paid to potential perforations in the gloves.

摘要

(1) 背景:根据先前的研究结果,光谱范围在200 - 230 nm的远紫外线辐射对病原体具有很强的抗菌作用,但对人体皮肤几乎没有任何有害影响。因此,本研究将探讨这种辐射是否也适用于医疗保健领域的手部消毒。(2) 方法:对手部和手套进行微生物污染,并使其暴露于222 nm氪氯准分子灯的辐射下。施加的剂量分别为23 mJ/cm²和100 mJ/cm²。将辐照和未辐照的手部及手套按压在琼脂平板上,培养24小时后计数并比较菌落。为作比较,我们还用市售的酒精基液体消毒剂对手部和手套进行了处理。(3) 结果:手部接受23 mJ/cm²的辐射后,琼脂平板上观察到的菌落减少了一个对数级。对于接受100 mJ/cm²辐照的手套,记录到菌落减少了1.3个对数级。在与市售消毒剂的对比实验中,手部和手套上观察到的菌落减少分别为1.9个对数级和大约一个对数级。(4) 结论:在这两种情况下,远紫外线辐射都使微生物数量大幅减少。然而,与已发表的远紫外线在悬浮液中的辐照结果相比,手部和手套上的消毒效果相当低。就目前欧盟存在的辐照限值而言,目前实际上依法不可能每天多次使用远紫外线辐射对手部进行消毒,但这些限值目前正在讨论中,未来可能会改变。如果注意手套上的潜在穿孔情况,理论上对手套中的手部进行远紫外线消毒似乎是可行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fa6/9963788/9b9d35cbefa5/pathogens-12-00213-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fa6/9963788/9a91cac6efbd/pathogens-12-00213-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fa6/9963788/9b9d35cbefa5/pathogens-12-00213-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fa6/9963788/9a91cac6efbd/pathogens-12-00213-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fa6/9963788/9b9d35cbefa5/pathogens-12-00213-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Far-UVC Radiation for Disinfecting Hands or Gloves?远紫外线辐射用于手部或手套消毒?
Pathogens. 2023 Jan 29;12(2):213. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12020213.
2
The impact of far-UVC radiation (200-230 nm) on pathogens, cells, skin, and eyes - a collection and analysis of a hundred years of data.远紫外线辐射(200 - 230纳米)对病原体、细胞、皮肤和眼睛的影响——百年数据的收集与分析
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2021 Feb 16;16:Doc07. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000378. eCollection 2021.
3
UV radiation sensitivity of bacteriophage PhiX174 - A potential surrogate for SARS-CoV-2 in terms of radiation inactivation.噬菌体PhiX174的紫外线辐射敏感性——就辐射灭活而言,一种潜在的新型冠状病毒替代物。
AIMS Microbiol. 2023 May 5;9(3):431-443. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023023. eCollection 2023.
4
Evaluation of Single-Pass Disinfection Performance of Far-UVC Light on Airborne Microorganisms in Duct Flows.远紫外线光对管道气流中空气传播微生物的单次消毒性能评估
Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Dec 20;56(24):17849-17857. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c04861. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
5
Improved Spectral Purity of 222-nm Irradiation Eliminates Detectable Cyclobutylpyrimidine Dimers Formation in Skin Reconstructs even at High and Repetitive Disinfecting Doses.即使在高剂量和重复消毒剂量下,222nm 照射的光谱纯度提高也能消除皮肤重建体中可检测到的环丁基嘧啶二聚体形成。
Photochem Photobiol. 2022 Sep;98(5):1149-1156. doi: 10.1111/php.13594. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
6
Far-UVC (222 nm) irradiation effectively inactivates ssRNA, dsRNA, ssDNA, and dsDNA viruses as compared to germicidal UVC (254 nm).与杀菌紫外线(254纳米)相比,远紫外线C(222纳米)照射能有效灭活单链RNA、双链RNA、单链DNA和双链DNA病毒。
Photochem Photobiol. 2025 Jan-Feb;101(1):147-156. doi: 10.1111/php.13961. Epub 2024 May 12.
7
Review of microbial touchscreen contamination for the determination of reasonable ultraviolet disinfection doses.用于确定合理紫外线消毒剂量的微生物触摸屏污染综述。
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2021 Nov 2;16:Doc30. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000401. eCollection 2021.
8
Reflection of UVC wavelengths from common materials during surface UV disinfection: Assessment of human UV exposure and ozone generation.常见材料在表面紫外线消毒过程中对 UVC 波长的反射:人类紫外线照射和臭氧生成评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Apr 15;869:161848. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161848. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
9
Skin tolerant inactivation of multiresistant pathogens using far-UVC LEDs.使用远紫外线 LED 实现皮肤耐受的多耐药病原体灭活。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 19;11(1):14647. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94070-2.
10
Potential harm to the skin from unfiltered krypton chloride 'far-ultraviolet-C' lamps, even below an occupational exposure limit.未经过滤的氪氯“远紫外线-C”灯对皮肤造成的潜在危害,即使在职业暴露限值以下。
J Radiol Prot. 2022 Nov 16;42(4). doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac9e60.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the antimicrobial effect of a far-uv radiation lamp in a real-life environment.远紫外线辐射灯在实际环境中的抗菌效果评估。
Infect Prev Pract. 2024 Aug 18;6(4):100390. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100390. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
The Antibacterial Efficacy of Far-UVC Light: A Combined-Method Study Exploring the Effects of Experimental and Bacterial Variables on Dose-Response.远紫外线光的抗菌效果:一项综合方法研究,探讨实验和细菌变量对剂量反应的影响。
Pathogens. 2024 Aug 19;13(8):698. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13080698.

本文引用的文献

1
UVC, UVB and UVA susceptibility of Phi6 and its suitability as a SARS-CoV-2 surrogate.Phi6对UVC、UVB和UVA的敏感性及其作为严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)替代物的适用性。
AIMS Microbiol. 2022 Jul 8;8(3):278-291. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2022020. eCollection 2022.
2
Investigation on Potential ESKAPE Surrogates for 222 and 254 nm Irradiation Experiments.用于222和254纳米辐照实验的潜在ESKAPE替代物研究。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jul 1;13:942708. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.942708. eCollection 2022.
3
No Evidence of Induced Skin Cancer or Other Skin Abnormalities after Long-Term (66 week) Chronic Exposure to 222-nm Far-UVC Radiation.
长期(66 周)慢性暴露于 222nm 远紫外线辐射后,未发现皮肤癌或其他皮肤异常的证据。
Photochem Photobiol. 2023 Jan;99(1):168-175. doi: 10.1111/php.13656. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
4
Effect of ultraviolet C emitted from KrCl excimer lamp with or without bandpass filter to mouse epidermis.KrCl 准分子灯发射的紫外线 C 及其带通滤光片对小鼠表皮的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 May 3;17(5):e0267957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267957. eCollection 2022.
5
Application of 233 nm far-UVC LEDs for eradication of MRSA and MSSA and risk assessment on skin models.233nm 远紫外线 LED 对 MRSA 和 MSSA 的杀灭作用及对皮肤模型的风险评估。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 16;12(1):2587. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06397-z.
6
Wavelength-dependent DNA Photodamage in a 3-D human Skin Model over the Far-UVC and Germicidal UVC Wavelength Ranges from 215 to 255 nm.在 215 至 255nm 的远 UVC 和杀菌 UVC 波长范围内,3D 人体皮肤模型中与波长相关的 DNA 光损伤。
Photochem Photobiol. 2022 Sep;98(5):1167-1171. doi: 10.1111/php.13602. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
7
Hand hygiene in health care: 20 years of ongoing advances and perspectives.手卫生在医疗保健中的应用:持续进展与展望 20 年。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Aug;21(8):e209-e221. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00383-2.
8
The impact of far-UVC radiation (200-230 nm) on pathogens, cells, skin, and eyes - a collection and analysis of a hundred years of data.远紫外线辐射(200 - 230纳米)对病原体、细胞、皮肤和眼睛的影响——百年数据的收集与分析
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2021 Feb 16;16:Doc07. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000378. eCollection 2021.
9
A Need to Revise Human Exposure Limits for Ultraviolet UV-C Radiation.需要修订人类紫外线 UV-C 辐射暴露限值。
Photochem Photobiol. 2021 May;97(3):485-492. doi: 10.1111/php.13402. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
10
Extreme Exposure to Filtered Far-UVC: A Case Study.极端过滤远紫外线 C 的暴露:案例研究。
Photochem Photobiol. 2021 May;97(3):527-531. doi: 10.1111/php.13385. Epub 2021 Feb 3.