• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用智能手机传感器测量社交互动动态:一项关于社交互动与孤独感的动态评估研究

Modeling social interaction dynamics measured with smartphone sensors: An ambulatory assessment study on social interactions and loneliness.

作者信息

Elmer Timon, Lodder Gerine

机构信息

Department of Psychometrics and Statistics, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Soc Pers Relat. 2023 Feb;40(2):654-669. doi: 10.1177/02654075221122069. Epub 2022 Aug 20.

DOI:10.1177/02654075221122069
PMID:36844896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9941651/
Abstract

More and more data are being collected using combined active (e.g., surveys) and passive (e.g., smartphone sensors) ambulatory assessment methods. Fine-grained temporal data, such as smartphone sensor data, allow gaining new insights into the dynamics of social interactions in day-to-day life and how these are associated with psychosocial phenomena - such as loneliness. So far, however, smartphone sensor data have often been aggregated over time, thus, not doing justice to the fine-grained temporality of these data. In this article, we demonstrate how time-stamped sensor data of social interactions can be modeled with multistate survival models. We examine how loneliness is associated with (a) the time between social interaction (i.e., interaction rate) and (b) the duration of social interactions in a student population (N = 45, N = 74,645). Before a 10-week ambulatory assessment phase, participants completed the UCLA loneliness scale, covering subscales on intimate, relational, and collective loneliness. Results from the multistate survival models indicated that loneliness subscales were not significantly associated with differences in social interaction rate and duration - only relational loneliness predicted shorter social interaction encounters. These findings illustrate how the combination of new measurement and modeling methods can advance knowledge on social interaction dynamics in daily life settings and how they relate to psychosocial phenomena such as loneliness.

摘要

越来越多的数据是通过主动(如调查)和被动(如智能手机传感器)相结合的动态评估方法收集的。细粒度的时间数据,如智能手机传感器数据,有助于深入了解日常生活中社交互动的动态以及这些互动如何与诸如孤独等社会心理现象相关联。然而,到目前为止,智能手机传感器数据常常是随时间汇总的,因此没有充分体现这些数据的细粒度时间性。在本文中,我们展示了如何用多状态生存模型对社交互动的时间戳传感器数据进行建模。我们研究了在一个学生群体(N = 45,N = 74,645)中,孤独感如何与(a)社交互动之间的时间间隔(即互动率)以及(b)社交互动的持续时间相关联。在为期10周的动态评估阶段之前,参与者完成了加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独量表,该量表涵盖了亲密、关系和集体孤独等子量表。多状态生存模型的结果表明,孤独感子量表与社交互动率和持续时间的差异没有显著关联——只有关系孤独感预示着社交互动遭遇时间较短。这些发现说明了新的测量和建模方法的结合如何能够推进对日常生活环境中社交互动动态以及它们如何与诸如孤独感等社会心理现象相关联的认识。

相似文献

1
Modeling social interaction dynamics measured with smartphone sensors: An ambulatory assessment study on social interactions and loneliness.利用智能手机传感器测量社交互动动态:一项关于社交互动与孤独感的动态评估研究
J Soc Pers Relat. 2023 Feb;40(2):654-669. doi: 10.1177/02654075221122069. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
2
Next-generation psychiatric assessment: Using smartphone sensors to monitor behavior and mental health.下一代精神病学评估:利用智能手机传感器监测行为和心理健康。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2015 Sep;38(3):218-226. doi: 10.1037/prj0000130. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
3
"Next-generation psychiatric assessment: Using smartphone sensors to monitor behavior and mental health": Correction to Ben-Zeev et al. (2015).“下一代精神病学评估:使用智能手机传感器监测行为和心理健康”:对本-泽夫等人(2015年)的勘误
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2015 Dec;38(4):313. doi: 10.1037/prj0000169.
4
Identifying Behavioral Phenotypes of Loneliness and Social Isolation with Passive Sensing: Statistical Analysis, Data Mining and Machine Learning of Smartphone and Fitbit Data.利用被动感知技术识别孤独和社会隔离的行为表现:智能手机和 Fitbit 数据的统计分析、数据挖掘和机器学习。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jul 24;7(7):e13209. doi: 10.2196/13209.
5
Modeling categorical time-to-event data: The example of social interaction dynamics captured with event-contingent experience sampling methods.对分类的事件发生时间数据进行建模:以事件依存性经验抽样方法捕捉到的社会互动动态为例。
Psychol Methods. 2023 Sep 7. doi: 10.1037/met0000598.
6
Loneliness and Social Isolation Detection Using Passive Sensing Techniques: Scoping Review.利用被动感知技术检测孤独和社交隔离:范围综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Apr 12;10(4):e34638. doi: 10.2196/34638.
7
Smartphone sensing of social interactions in people with and without schizophrenia.智能手机对有精神分裂症和无精神分裂症人群社交互动的感知。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 May;137:613-620. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
8
How smartphone usage correlates with social anxiety and loneliness.智能手机的使用与社交焦虑和孤独感之间的关联。
PeerJ. 2016 Jul 12;4:e2197. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2197. eCollection 2016.
9
The association between autistic traits and excessive smartphone use in Chinese college students: The chain mediating roles of social interaction anxiety and loneliness.中国大学生自闭症特征与过度使用智能手机的关系:社交互动焦虑和孤独感的链式中介作用。
Res Dev Disabil. 2022 Dec;131:104369. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104369. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
10
Mindfulness training reduces loneliness and increases social contact in a randomized controlled trial.正念训练可减少孤独感并增加随机对照试验中的社会接触。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Feb 26;116(9):3488-3493. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1813588116. Epub 2019 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Unmasking Nuances Affecting Loneliness: Using Digital Behavioural Markers to Understand Social and Emotional Loneliness in College Students.揭示影响孤独感的细微差别:利用数字行为标记理解大学生的社交孤独感和情感孤独感。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Mar 19;25(6):1903. doi: 10.3390/s25061903.
2
Editorial for Special Issue "Psychophysiology and Experimental Psychology".《“心理生理学与实验心理学”特刊》社论
Int J Psychol Res (Medellin). 2023 Oct 10;16(2):1-3. doi: 10.21500/20112084.6584. eCollection 2023 Jul-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Sensing Apps and Public Data Sets for Digital Phenotyping of Mental Health: Systematic Review.用于心理健康数字化表型的感知应用程序和公共数据集:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 17;24(2):e28735. doi: 10.2196/28735.
2
Eavesdropping on Missing Data: What Are University Students Doing When They Miss Experience Sampling Reports?偷听缺失数据:大学生错过体验采样报告时在做什么?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Nov;47(11):1535-1549. doi: 10.1177/0146167220964639. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
3
Smartphone sensing of social interactions in people with and without schizophrenia.智能手机对有精神分裂症和无精神分裂症人群社交互动的感知。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 May;137:613-620. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
4
Opportunities and challenges in the collection and analysis of digital phenotyping data.数字表型数据收集与分析中的机遇与挑战。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Jan;46(1):45-54. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-0771-3. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
5
Relations of friendship experiences with depressive symptoms and loneliness in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review.友谊经验与儿童和青少年期抑郁症状和孤独感的关系:一项元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2020 Aug;146(8):664-700. doi: 10.1037/bul0000239. Epub 2020 May 14.
6
Digital phenotyping in psychological and medical sciences: a reflection about necessary prerequisites to reduce harm and increase benefits.数字表型在心理和医学科学中的应用:关于减少危害和增加益处的必要前提的思考。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Dec;36:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.013. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
7
Depressive symptoms are associated with social isolation in face-to-face interaction networks.抑郁症状与面对面互动网络中的社会隔离有关。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 29;10(1):1444. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58297-9.
8
Happiness and Social Behavior.幸福与社会行为。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Aug;30(8):1111-1122. doi: 10.1177/0956797619849666. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
9
The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions.RFID 徽章对面部互动测量的有效性。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Oct;51(5):2120-2138. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1180-y.
10
"Eavesdropping on Happiness" Revisited: A Pooled, Multisample Replication of the Association Between Life Satisfaction and Observed Daily Conversation Quantity and Quality.重新审视“偷听幸福”:生活满意度与观察到的日常对话数量和质量之间关联的综合多样本复制研究。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Sep;29(9):1451-1462. doi: 10.1177/0956797618774252. Epub 2018 Jul 3.