• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喉切除患者的嗅觉功能：气管食管食管言语。

Olfactory function in laryngectomised patients: tracheo-oesophageal oesophageal speech.

机构信息

Otolaryngology, Department of Health Science, University of Catanzaro, Italy.

Otolaryngology Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2023 Feb;43(1):20-25. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N2253.

DOI:10.14639/0392-100X-N2253
PMID:36860146
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9978304/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate olfactory function in patients rehabilitated with oesophageal (ES) voice or tracheo-oesophageal (TES) prosthesis to further verify whether there were differences in smell alterations depending on voice rehabilitation modality.

METHODS

A total of 40 patients who had undergone total laryngectomy participated in the study. Speech rehabilitation was achieved through TES in 20 patients (Group A) or ES in 20 patients (Group B). Olfactory function was evaluated using the Sniffin' Sticks test.

RESULTS

At olfactory evaluation, in Group A, 4/20 patients (20%) were anosmic, whereas 16/20 patients (80%) were hyposmic; in Group B, 11/20 patients (55%) were anosmic whereas 9/20 patients (45%) were hyposmic. A significant difference (p = 0.04) was found at global objective evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

The study shows that the rehabilitation with TES contributes to maintaining a functioning, albeit limited, sense of smell.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估食管（ES）发声或气管食管（TES）假体修复后的患者的嗅觉功能，以进一步验证嗅觉改变是否因嗓音康复方式的不同而存在差异。

方法

共有 40 名接受全喉切除术的患者参与了这项研究。20 名患者（A 组）通过 TES 进行言语康复，20 名患者（B 组）通过 ES 进行言语康复。使用嗅觉测试棒评估嗅觉功能。

结果

在嗅觉评估中，A 组有 4/20 名患者（20%）为失嗅，16/20 名患者（80%）为嗅觉减退；B 组有 11/20 名患者（55%）为失嗅，9/20 名患者（45%）为嗅觉减退。在全球客观评估中发现了显著差异（p = 0.04）。

结论

本研究表明，TES 康复有助于维持功能有限的嗅觉。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c893/9978304/a90a8742f94a/aoi-2023-01-20-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c893/9978304/0f59c34e125d/aoi-2023-01-20-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c893/9978304/a90a8742f94a/aoi-2023-01-20-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c893/9978304/0f59c34e125d/aoi-2023-01-20-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c893/9978304/a90a8742f94a/aoi-2023-01-20-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Olfactory function in laryngectomised patients: tracheo-oesophageal oesophageal speech.喉切除患者的嗅觉功能：气管食管食管言语。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2023 Feb;43(1):20-25. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N2253.
2
Evaluation of the efficacy of the 'nasal airflow-inducing manoeuvre' for smell rehabilitation in laryngectomees by means of the Sniffin' Sticks test.利用“嗅觉测试棒”评估“鼻气流诱导动作”对喉切除术后患者嗅觉康复的疗效。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2011 Feb;36(1):17-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02261.x.
3
[Voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy with voice prostheses. Results of a prospective follow-up study].[喉切除术后使用发音假体的语音康复。一项前瞻性随访研究的结果]
Laryngorhinootologie. 1992 Aug;71(8):416-22. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-997326.
4
Voice prosthesis rehabilitation after total laryngectomy: are satisfaction and quality of life maintained over time?全喉切除术后发音假体康复：满意度和生活质量会随时间维持吗？
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2019 Jun;39(3):162-168. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-2227.
5
Effectiveness of voice rehabilitation on vocalisation in postlaryngectomy patients: a systematic review.喉切除术后患者的嗓音康复对发声效果的影响：系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2010 Dec;8(4):256-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2010.00177.x.
6
[Olfactory rehabilitation via retronasal olfaction using a tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy. German version].[全喉切除术后经鼻后嗅觉使用气管食管发音假体进行嗅觉康复。德文版]
HNO. 2022 Dec;70(12):878-885. doi: 10.1007/s00106-022-01228-z. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
7
The French way of voice rehabilitation post total laryngectomy: current clinical practices and tendencies.法国全喉切除术后嗓音康复方法：当前的临床实践和趋势。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2023 May;143(5):440-445. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2023.2206873. Epub 2023 May 9.
8
[Voice rehabilitation from the viewpoint of the laryngectomized patient. Results of a patient survey].[从喉切除患者角度看嗓音康复。一项患者调查结果]
Laryngorhinootologie. 1994 Sep;73(9):500-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-997181.
9
Validation study of the "Sniffin' Sticks" olfactory test in a British population: a preliminary communication.“嗅探棒”嗅觉测试在英国人群中的验证研究：初步交流。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2012 Feb;37(1):23-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2012.02431.x.
10
Comparison of Voice Handicap Index in Patients with Esophageal and Tracheoesophageal Speech after Total Laryngectomy.全喉切除术后食管发音和气管食管发音患者的嗓音障碍指数比较
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2020;72(5):363-369. doi: 10.1159/000502091. Epub 2019 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
A new olfactory rehabilitation protocol based on physiological induction of nasal airflow after total laryngectomy: the Physiological Olfactory Recovery Technique (PORT).一种基于全喉切除术后鼻腔气流生理诱导的新型嗅觉康复方案：生理嗅觉恢复技术（PORT）。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jul 25;33(8):719. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09766-2.
2
Statistical overview of the Sniffin' sticks olfactory test from the perspectives of anosmia and hyposmia.从嗅觉丧失和嗅觉减退角度看嗅觉棒嗅觉测试的统计概述
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 15;15(1):8984. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93380-z.
3
An observational study of olfactory functions in total laryngectomees.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction persistence after COVID-19: a prospective study.新冠病毒感染后嗅觉功能障碍持续时间的评估：一项前瞻性研究。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Feb;26(3):1042-1048. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202202_28014.
2
Role of Clinical-Demographic Data in Survival Rates of Advanced Laryngeal Cancer.临床人口统计学数据在晚期喉癌生存率中的作用
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Mar 15;57(3):267. doi: 10.3390/medicina57030267.
3
A simple method for olfactory rehabilitation following total laryngectomy.全喉切除术后嗅觉康复的一种简单方法。
全喉切除术后嗅觉功能的观察性研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 May;281(5):2515-2521. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08514-2. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Dec;278(12):4917-4921. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06711-x. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
4
Updates on larynx cancer epidemiology.喉癌流行病学的最新进展。
Chin J Cancer Res. 2020 Feb;32(1):18-25. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2020.01.03.
5
Applying nasal airflow - inducing maneuvers with patients with hyposmia after total laryngectomy.对全喉切除术后嗅觉减退患者应用诱导鼻气流的手法。
Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2019;23(3):141-145. doi: 10.5114/wo.2019.86688. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
6
Verbal performance of total laryngectomized patients rehabilitated with esophageal speech and tracheoesophageal speech: impacts on patient quality of life.接受食管发音和气管食管发音康复的全喉切除患者的言语表现：对患者生活质量的影响。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019 Aug 15;12:675-681. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S212793. eCollection 2019.
7
Updated Sniffin' Sticks normative data based on an extended sample of 9139 subjects.基于9139名受试者的扩展样本更新的嗅觉棒常模数据。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Mar;276(3):719-728. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5248-1. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
8
Impact of the anterior commissure involvement on the survival of early glottic cancer treated with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy: a retrospective study.前联合受累对环舌会厌固定术治疗早期声门癌生存率的影响：一项回顾性研究
Cancer Manag Res. 2018 Nov 8;10:5553-5558. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S182854. eCollection 2018.
9
Psychological intervention improves life quality of patients with laryngeal cancer.心理干预可提高喉癌患者的生活质量。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Oct 5;11:1723-1727. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S147205. eCollection 2017.
10
Smell and Taste Impairment After Total Laryngectomy.全喉切除术后的嗅觉和味觉障碍
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2017 Jul;126(7):548-554. doi: 10.1177/0003489417709794. Epub 2017 May 16.