Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Department of Neuroinformatics, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Neuroimage. 2023 May 1;271:119998. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.119998. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
Accurately measuring and quantifying the underlying interactions between brain areas is crucial for understanding the flow of information in the brain. Of particular interest in the field of electrophysiology is the analysis and characterization of the spectral properties of these interactions. Coherence and Granger-Geweke causality are well-established, commonly used methods for quantifying inter-areal interactions, and are thought to reflect the strength of inter-areal interactions. Here we show that the application of both methods to bidirectional systems with transmission delays is problematic, especially for coherence. Under certain circumstances, coherence can be completely abolished despite there being a true underlying interaction. This problem occurs due to interference caused in the computation of coherence, and is an artifact of the method. We motivate an understanding of the problem through computational modelling and numerical simulations. In addition, we have developed two methods that can recover the true bidirectional interactions in the presence of transmission delays.
准确测量和量化大脑区域之间的潜在相互作用对于理解大脑中的信息流至关重要。在电生理学领域,特别感兴趣的是分析和描述这些相互作用的频谱特性。相干性和格兰杰-盖维克因果关系是用于量化区域间相互作用的成熟且常用的方法,被认为反映了区域间相互作用的强度。在这里,我们表明,将这两种方法应用于具有传输延迟的双向系统存在问题,特别是对于相干性。在某些情况下,尽管存在真实的潜在相互作用,相干性也可能完全被消除。这个问题是由于相干性计算中的干扰引起的,是方法的一种假象。我们通过计算建模和数值模拟来理解这个问题。此外,我们还开发了两种方法,可以在存在传输延迟的情况下恢复真实的双向相互作用。