Arif Adeel, Santana Felipes Rachel C, Hoxhaj Mia, Light Michael B, Dadario Nicholas B, Cook Brennan, Cataldo Matthew J, Jafri Farrukh N
Department of Emergency Medicine, White Plains Hospital, White Plains, USA.
Department of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, USA.
Cureus. 2023 Jan 28;15(1):e34320. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34320. eCollection 2023 Jan.
Trauma is a leading cause of preventable death in the United States. Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) often arrive first at the scene of traumatic injuries to perform life-saving skills such as tourniquet placement. While current EMT courses teach and test tourniquet application, studies have shown efficacy and retention of EMT skills such as tourniquet placement decay over time, with educational interventions needed to improve retention of skills.
A prospective randomized pilot study was conducted to determine differences in retention of tourniquet placement among 40 EMT students after initial training. Participants were randomly assigned to either a virtual reality (VR) intervention or a control group. The VR group received instruction from a refresher VR program 35 days after initial training as a supplement to their EMT course. Both the VR and control participants' tourniquet skills were assessed 70 days after initial training by blinded instructors. Results: There was no significant difference in correct tourniquet placement between both groups (Control, 63% vs Intervention, 57%, p = 0.57). It was found that 9/21 participants (43%) in the VR intervention group failed to correctly apply the tourniquet while 7/19 of the control participants (37%) failed in tourniquet application. Additionally, the VR group was more likely to fail the tourniquet application due to improper tightening than the control group during the final assessment (p = 0.04). Conclusion: In this pilot study, using a VR headset in conjunction with in-person training did not improve the efficacy and retention of tourniquet placement skills. Participants who received the VR intervention were more likely to have errors relating to haptics, rather than procedure-related errors.
创伤是美国可预防死亡的主要原因。紧急医疗技术人员(EMT)通常最先抵达创伤现场,以实施诸如使用止血带等挽救生命的技能。虽然当前的EMT课程会教授并测试止血带的应用,但研究表明,诸如止血带放置等EMT技能的效果和记忆会随着时间推移而衰退,需要进行教育干预来提高技能的记忆保持。
进行了一项前瞻性随机试点研究,以确定40名EMT学生在初始培训后止血带放置记忆保持方面的差异。参与者被随机分配到虚拟现实(VR)干预组或对照组。VR组在初始培训35天后接受了一个复习VR程序的指导,作为其EMT课程的补充。在初始培训70天后,由不知情的教员对VR组和对照组参与者的止血带技能进行评估。结果:两组之间在正确放置止血带方面没有显著差异(对照组为63%,干预组为57%,p = 0.57)。发现在VR干预组中,9/21名参与者(43%)未能正确应用止血带,而对照组中有7/19名参与者(37%)在止血带应用方面失败。此外,在最终评估中,VR组因收紧不当而在止血带应用中失败的可能性比对照组更高(p = 0.04)。结论:在这项试点研究中,将VR头显与现场培训相结合并没有提高止血带放置技能的效果和记忆保持。接受VR干预的参与者更有可能出现与触觉相关的错误,而不是与操作程序相关的错误。