• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高龄老人心理弹性量表中文版的效度验证

Validation of the Chinese version of the resilience scale for the oldest-old.

作者信息

Wang Ning, Chen Hongyu, Zhang Minyi, Wang Yuanyuan, Xue Zhihan, Hao Xixi, Liu Yan

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

Department of Nursing, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 17;14:1055301. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1055301. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1055301
PMID:36874822
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9982108/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Resilience is one of the most important variables associated with adaptive ability. The resilience scale for the oldest-old age (RSO) has been designed to measure the resilience among the oldest-old people. Originally developed in Japan, this scale has not been used in China. The objective of this study was to translate the RSO into Chinese and investigate its validity and reliability among the community's oldest-old adults aged ≥80 years.

METHODS

A total of 473 oldest-old people who came from communities were recruited by convenience sampling for the assessment of construct validity using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). In addition, internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, face validity, and content validity were used to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of RSO.

RESULTS

The RSO demonstrated good face validity and content validity. The content validity index of the Chinese version of the RSO was 0.890. Moreover, one factor was extracted by exploratory factor analysis, which accounted for 61.26% of the variance. The RSO had high internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha = 0.927. The test-retest reliability was 0.785. The item-total correlations ranged from 0.752 to 0.832.

CONCLUSION

The results of the study indicate that the Chinese version of the RSO questionnaire has good reliability and validity and can be recommended for use by health and social service agencies as a method for assessing the resilience of the oldest-old in the community.

摘要

背景

心理韧性是与适应能力相关的最重要变量之一。高龄老人心理韧性量表(RSO)旨在测量高龄老人的心理韧性。该量表最初在日本开发,尚未在中国使用。本研究的目的是将RSO翻译成中文,并调查其在社区中年龄≥80岁的高龄成年人中的有效性和可靠性。

方法

通过便利抽样招募了473名来自社区的高龄老人,采用探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)评估结构效度。此外,还使用内部一致性信度、重测信度、表面效度和内容效度来评估RSO的心理测量学特征。

结果

RSO表现出良好的表面效度和内容效度。RSO中文版的内容效度指数为0.890。此外,探索性因素分析提取了一个因素,该因素解释了61.26%的方差。RSO具有较高的内部一致性,Cronbach's alpha = 0.927。重测信度为0.785。项目与总分的相关性范围为0.752至0.832。

结论

研究结果表明,RSO问卷中文版具有良好的信度和效度,可推荐健康和社会服务机构使用,作为评估社区高龄老人心理韧性的一种方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e91/9982108/10b85458df7c/fpsyg-14-1055301-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e91/9982108/10b85458df7c/fpsyg-14-1055301-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e91/9982108/10b85458df7c/fpsyg-14-1055301-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the Chinese version of the resilience scale for the oldest-old.高龄老人心理弹性量表中文版的效度验证
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 17;14:1055301. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1055301. eCollection 2023.
2
Development of a resilience scale for oldest-old age (RSO).开发一个针对超高龄老人(RSO)的适应力量表。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Mar 10;21(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02036-w.
3
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Academic Resilience Scale-30 (C-ARS-30) in college students.大学生中文版学术复原力量表30(C-ARS-30)的心理测量学评估
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 7;15:1276618. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1276618. eCollection 2024.
4
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience Questionnaire (FaRE Questionnaire) in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study.中文版家庭复原力问卷(FaRE问卷)在乳腺癌患者中的信效度:一项横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 20;12(4):e051093. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051093.
5
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
6
Validation of the personal suicide stigma questionnaire among adolescents with suicide attempts in mainland China.中国大陆有自杀未遂经历青少年的个人自杀污名调查问卷的效度验证
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 13;15:1445247. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1445247. eCollection 2024.
7
Development, validation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the biopsychosocial impact scale in orofacial pain patients.口腔面部疼痛患者生物心理社会影响量表中文版的编制、验证及心理测量学评估
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 7;14:1101383. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1101383. eCollection 2023.
8
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.中文版 Morisky 药物依从性量表八条目版在系统性红斑狼疮中国患者中的信度和效度。
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Sep;41(9):2713-2720. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06195-y. Epub 2022 May 10.
9
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the resilience scale for parents of children with cancer.中文版癌症患儿家长心理韧性量表的心理测量学评估
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 18;15:1378639. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1378639. eCollection 2024.
10
Validation of the Chinese Version Community's Self-Efficacy Scale in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.中文版社区自我效能感量表在社区老年人中的效度验证
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Apr 19;16:1061-1070. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S359459. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of abridged Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 10 (CD-RISC-10) among older adults.简译 Connor-Davidson 韧性量表 10 项简式版(CD-RISC-10)在老年人中的波斯文版本的心理测量特性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 23;22(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04138-0.
2
Quality-of-Life Evaluation among the Oldest-Old in China under the "Active Aging Framework".中国“积极老龄化框架”下高龄老人的生活质量评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 11;19(8):4572. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084572.
3
New resilience instrument for family caregivers in cancer: a multidimensional item response theory analysis.
用于癌症患者家庭照顾者的新韧性工具:多维项目反应理论分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Nov 18;19(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01893-8.
4
Measurement Invariance of the Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS) in Peruvian and Spanish Older Adults.简要韧性应对量表(BRCS)在秘鲁和西班牙老年人中的测量不变性。
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2021 Dec;36(4):431-444. doi: 10.1007/s10823-021-09441-z. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
5
Childhood maltreatment and self-harm in Chinese adolescents: moderation and mediation via resilience.中文青少年的儿童期虐待和自伤:韧性的调节和中介作用。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Aug 17;21(1):1561. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11605-y.
6
Differential item functioning of the Beck Anxiety Inventory in a rural, multi-ethnic cohort.贝克焦虑量表在农村多民族队列中的差异项目功能。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Oct 1;293:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
7
Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool for family caregivers of cancer patients receiving home-based hospice care.翻译、文化调适及验证中文版照顾者支持需求评估工具,以评估接受居家安宁疗护的癌症病患之家庭照顾者。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 May 19;20(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00766-7.
8
Culture in the spotlight-cultural adaptation and content validity of the integrated palliative care outcome scale for dementia: A cognitive interview study.聚光灯下的文化——痴呆症综合姑息治疗结果量表的文化适应与内容效度:一项认知访谈研究
Palliat Med. 2021 May;35(5):962-971. doi: 10.1177/02692163211004403. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
9
Psychological resilience and active aging among older people with mobility limitations.行动不便的老年人的心理韧性与积极老龄化
Eur J Ageing. 2020 May 4;18(1):65-74. doi: 10.1007/s10433-020-00569-4. eCollection 2021 Mar.
10
The resilience scale: factorial structure, reliability, validity, and parenting-related factors among disaster-exposed adolescents.韧性量表:暴露于灾难中的青少年的因子结构、信度、效度和与父母教养相关的因素。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 10;21(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03153-x.