• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较神经精神问卷行为和心理症状结构。

Comparing behavioral and psychological symptom structures on the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire.

机构信息

Division of Movement Disorders, Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois College of Medicine.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2023 Jun;35(6):522-532. doi: 10.1037/pas0001230. Epub 2023 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1037/pas0001230
PMID:36892877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11419849/
Abstract

The Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) is a collateral-rated measure of behavioral and psychological symptoms commonly found in dementia (BPSD). Several factor structures have been published, but they have not been systematically compared. Furthermore, the possibility of hierarchical models or presence of measurement invariance around cognitive stage or dementia syndrome has not been previously evaluated. This study addressed these gaps with confirmatory factor analyses using a multicenter sample ( = 41,801; = 71.4; 57% women; 79% White, 13% Black, 8% Hispanic; = 15.1) that was divided into exploratory, derivation, and holdover subsets for cross-validation. We found that a four-factor model had the best fit, with adequate reliability estimates, adequate τ-equivalence, and the least amount of measurement variance. Strict invariance across stage and syndrome was not supported, although there was adequate support for weaker restrictions (e.g., equal forms). Furthermore, all bifactor models had a significant increase in fit. In sum, the present study provides practical guidance on using NPI-Q factor-derived subscales and theoretical elaboration of BPSD's hierarchical and syndrome-variant structure. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

神经精神病学问卷 (NPI-Q) 是一种针对痴呆症中常见的行为和心理症状 (BPSD) 的旁证评定量表。已经发表了几种因素结构,但尚未对其进行系统比较。此外,尚未对认知阶段或痴呆综合征周围的层次模型或测量不变性的可能性进行评估。本研究使用多中心样本 (n = 41,801; M = 71.4; 57% 为女性; 79% 为白人,13% 为黑人,8% 为西班牙裔; SD = 15.1) 通过验证性因素分析来解决这些差距,该样本分为探索性、推导性和保留性子集进行交叉验证。我们发现,四因素模型具有最佳拟合度,可靠性估计值适中,τ 等效性适中,测量方差最小。虽然对较弱的限制 (例如,相同形式) 有足够的支持,但不支持严格的阶段和综合征不变性。此外,所有双因素模型的拟合度都有显著提高。总之,本研究为使用 NPI-Q 因子衍生的分量表提供了实用指导,并对 BPSD 的层次和综合征变异结构进行了理论阐述。 (PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2023 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Comparing behavioral and psychological symptom structures on the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire.比较神经精神问卷行为和心理症状结构。
Psychol Assess. 2023 Jun;35(6):522-532. doi: 10.1037/pas0001230. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
2
Functional assessment and neuropsychiatric inventory questionnaires: measurement invariance across hispanics and non-Hispanic whites.功能评估与神经精神问卷:西班牙裔与非西班牙裔白人之间的测量不变性
Gerontologist. 2014 Jun;54(3):375-86. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt026. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
3
[Neuropsychiatric inventory questionnaire (NPI-Q): A validity study of the Dutch form].[神经精神科问卷(NPI-Q):荷兰语版本的效度研究]
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2003 Apr;34(2):74-7.
4
Values of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire in Individuals with Dementia.痴呆患者神经精神问卷的最小临床重要差值的价值。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Jul;63(7):1448-52. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13473. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
5
Assessment of neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia: validity and reliability of the Lebanese version of the neuropsychiatric inventory questionnaire.评估痴呆患者的神经精神症状:神经精神问卷黎巴嫩版的效度和信度。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2021 Sep-Oct;28(5):588-595. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2019.1670182. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
6
Subscale validation of the neuropsychiatric inventory questionnaire: comparison of Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative and national Alzheimer's coordinating center cohorts.神经精神问卷量表的子量表验证:阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议和国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心队列的比较。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;21(7):607-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2012.10.027. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
7
Reliability and structural validity of the Chinese version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Nursing Home version.中文版《神经精神科问卷,疗养院版》的信度与结构效度
Psychogeriatrics. 2018 Mar;18(2):113-122. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12292. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
8
Validity and reliability of the neuropsychiatric inventory questionnaire version in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack having cognitive impairment.神经精神科问卷量表在患有认知障碍的中风或短暂性脑缺血发作患者中的效度和信度
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2014 Dec;27(4):247-52. doi: 10.1177/0891988714532017. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
9
Development of a Thai tool for assessing behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: A confirmatory factor analysis.泰国评估痴呆患者行为和心理症状工具的开发:验证性因子分析。
Brain Behav. 2020 Nov;10(11):e01816. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1816. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
10
A new simple score (ABS) for assessing behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia.一种用于评估痴呆行为和心理症状的新型简易评分(ABS)。
J Neurol Sci. 2015 Mar 15;350(1-2):14-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.01.029. Epub 2015 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Practical Assessment of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms: Updated Reliability, Validity, and Cutoffs for the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire.神经精神症状的实际评估:神经精神症状问卷的更新可靠性、有效性及临界值
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2025 May;33(5):524-534. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2024.10.014. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
2
Reliability and validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment's auditory items (MoCA-22).蒙特利尔认知评估量表听觉项目(MoCA-22)的信度和效度。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2024 Apr;38(3):783-798. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2023.2261634. Epub 2023 Sep 24.

本文引用的文献

1
2022 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.2022 年阿尔茨海默病事实和数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2022 Apr;18(4):700-789. doi: 10.1002/alz.12638. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
2
Black and White individuals differ in dementia prevalence, risk factors, and symptomatic presentation.黑人和白人在痴呆症的患病率、风险因素和症状表现方面存在差异。
Alzheimers Dement. 2022 Aug;18(8):1461-1471. doi: 10.1002/alz.12509. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
3
Neuropsychiatric symptoms and brain morphology in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease with dementia.轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病痴呆患者的神经精神症状和脑形态。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2021 Nov;33(11):1217-1228. doi: 10.1017/S1041610221000934. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
4
The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence.精神病理学的分层分类法(HiTOP):基于证据共识的定量分类学。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2021 May 7;17:83-108. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-093304. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
5
Comprehensive Evaluation of the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) and Its Reliability and Validity.功能活动问卷(FAQ)的综合评估及其信度和效度。
Assessment. 2022 Jun;29(4):748-763. doi: 10.1177/1073191121991215. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
6
Ethnic Differences Between Hispanics and Non-Hispanic Whites in Neuropsychiatric Symptoms Predict Conversion to Mild Cognitive Impairment.西班牙裔和非西班牙裔白种人之间在神经精神症状方面的种族差异预测向轻度认知障碍的转化。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2021 Nov;34(6):622-631. doi: 10.1177/0891988720957087. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
7
The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: Development and Applications.《神经精神科问卷:编制与应用》
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2020 Mar;33(2):73-84. doi: 10.1177/0891988719882102.
8
Informant Reporting in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Sources of Discrepancy on the Functional Activities Questionnaire.轻度认知障碍中的信息报告:功能活动问卷的差异来源。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2020 May;26(5):503-514. doi: 10.1017/S1355617719001449. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
9
Does the neuropsychiatric inventory predict progression from mild cognitive impairment to dementia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.神经精神问卷是否能预测从轻度认知障碍到痴呆的进展?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ageing Res Rev. 2020 Mar;58:101004. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2019.101004. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
10
Neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia.痴呆中的神经精神症状
Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;167:437-454. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-804766-8.00024-8.