Hanpaibool Chonnikan, Ngamwongsatit Natharin, Ounjai Puey, Yotphan Sirilata, Wolschann Peter, Mulholland Adrian J, Spencer James, Rungrotmongkol Thanyada
Center of Excellence in Biocatalyst and Sustainable Biotechnology, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Department of Clinical Sciences and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.
ACS Omega. 2023 Feb 20;8(9):8366-8376. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07165. eCollection 2023 Mar 7.
The polymyxin colistin is a last line antibiotic for extensively resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Colistin binding to lipid A disrupts the Gram-negative outer membrane, but mobile colistin resistance () gene family members confer resistance by catalyzing phosphoethanolamine (PEA) transfer onto lipid A, neutralizing its negative charge to reduce colistin interactions. Multiple isoforms have been identified in clinical and environmental isolates, with being the most widespread and being common in South and East Asia. Preliminary screening revealed that treatment with pyrazolones significantly reduced , but not , mediated colistin resistance. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the catalytic domains of MCR-1 and a homology model of MCR-3, in different protonation states of active site residues H395/H380 and H478/H463, indicate that the MCR-1 active site has greater water accessibility than MCR-3, but that this is less influenced by changes in protonation. MD-optimized structures of MCR-1 and MCR-3 were used in virtual screening of 20 pyrazolone derivatives. Docking of these into the MCR-1/MCR-3 active sites identifies common residues likely to be involved in protein-ligand interactions, specifically the catalytic threonine (MCR-1 T285, MCR-3 T277) site of PEA addition, as well as differential interactions with adjacent amino acids. Minimal inhibitory concentration assays showed that the pyrazolone with the lowest predicted binding energy (ST3f) restores colistin susceptibility of , but not , expressing . Thus, simulations indicate differences in the active site structure between MCR-1 and MCR-3 that may give rise to differences in pyrazolone binding and so relate to differential effects upon producer . This work identifies pyrazolones as able to restore colistin susceptibility of -producing bacteria, laying the foundation for further investigations of their activity as phosphoethanolamine transferase inhibitors as well as of their differential activity toward isoforms.
多粘菌素黏菌素是用于治疗广泛耐药革兰氏阴性菌的最后一道防线抗生素。黏菌素与脂多糖A结合会破坏革兰氏阴性菌的外膜,但可移动的黏菌素耐药性(MCR)基因家族成员通过催化磷酸乙醇胺(PEA)转移到脂多糖A上赋予耐药性,中和其负电荷以减少黏菌素的相互作用。在临床和环境分离株中已鉴定出多种MCR亚型,其中MCR-1最为普遍,MCR-3在南亚和东亚常见。初步筛选显示,用吡唑啉酮处理可显著降低MCR-1介导的黏菌素耐药性,但不能降低MCR-3介导的耐药性。对处于活性位点残基H395/H380和H478/H463不同质子化状态的MCR-1催化结构域和MCR-3同源模型进行分子动力学(MD)模拟,结果表明,MCR-1活性位点的水可及性比MCR-3更大,但这受质子化变化的影响较小。MCR-1和MCR-3的MD优化结构用于对20种吡唑啉酮衍生物进行虚拟筛选。将这些衍生物对接至MCR-1/MCR-3活性位点可确定可能参与蛋白质 - 配体相互作用的共同残基,特别是PEA添加的催化苏氨酸(MCR-1的T285、MCR-3的T277)位点,以及与相邻氨基酸的差异相互作用。最低抑菌浓度测定表明,预测结合能最低的吡唑啉酮(ST3f)可恢复MCR-1表达菌的黏菌素敏感性,但不能恢复MCR-3表达菌的敏感性。因此,模拟表明MCR-1和MCR-3活性位点结构存在差异,这可能导致吡唑啉酮结合的差异,从而与对产生菌的不同作用相关。这项工作确定吡唑啉酮能够恢复MCR产生菌的黏菌素敏感性,为进一步研究其作为磷酸乙醇胺转移酶抑制剂的活性以及对MCR亚型的差异活性奠定了基础。