Morrison Christopher N, Gobaud Ariana N, Mehranbod Christina A, Bushover Brady R, Branas Charles C, Wiebe Douglas J, Peek-Asa Corinne, Chen Qixuan, Ferris Jason
Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 West 168th St, R505, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Inj Epidemiol. 2023 Mar 13;10(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40621-023-00427-8.
Sobriety checkpoints are a highly effective strategy to reduce alcohol-impaired driving, but they are used infrequently in the USA. Recent evidence from observational studies suggests that using optimized sobriety checkpoints-operating for shorter duration with fewer officers-can minimize operational costs without reducing public health benefits. The aim of this research was to conduct a pilot study to test whether police can feasibly implement optimized sobriety checkpoints and whether researchers can examine optimized sobriety checkpoints compared to usual practice within a non-randomized controlled trial study design.
The study site was the Town of Apex, NC. We worked with Apex Police Department to develop a schedule of sobriety checkpoints during calendar year 2021 that comprised 2 control checkpoints (conducted according to routine practice) and 4 optimized checkpoints staffed by fewer officers. Our primary operations aim was to test whether police can feasibly implement optimized sobriety checkpoints. Our primary research aim was to identify barriers and facilitators for conducting an intervention study of optimized sobriety checkpoints compared to usual practice. A secondary aim was to assess motorist support for sobriety checkpoints and momentary stress while passing through checkpoints.
Apex PD conducted 5 of the 6 checkpoints and reported similar operational capabilities and results during the optimized checkpoints compared to control checkpoints. For example, a mean of 4 drivers were investigated for possibly driving while impaired at the optimized checkpoints, compared to 2 drivers at control checkpoints. The field team conducted intercept surveys among 112 motorists at 4 of the 6 checkpoints in the trial schedule. The survey response rate was 11% from among 1,045 motorists who passed through these checkpoints. Over 90% of respondents supported sobriety checkpoints, and momentary stress during checkpoints was greater for motorists who reported consuming any alcohol in the last 90 days compared to nondrinkers (OR = 6.7, 95%CI: 1.6, 27.1).
Results of this study indicate the sobriety checkpoints can feasibly be optimized by municipal police departments, but it will be very difficult to assess the impacts of optimized checkpoints compared to usual practice using an experimental study design.
清醒检查站是减少酒后驾车的一项高效策略,但在美国却很少使用。近期观察性研究的证据表明,采用优化后的清醒检查站——以更短的时长、更少的警员开展检查——能够在不降低对公众健康益处的情况下将运营成本降至最低。本研究的目的是开展一项试点研究,以测试警方是否能够切实实施优化后的清醒检查站,以及研究人员能否在非随机对照试验研究设计中,将优化后的清醒检查站与常规做法进行比较研究。
研究地点为北卡罗来纳州的埃佩克斯镇。我们与埃佩克斯警察局合作,制定了2021年全年的清醒检查站时间表,其中包括2个对照检查站(按常规做法进行)和4个配备警员较少的优化检查站。我们的主要行动目标是测试警方是否能够切实实施优化后的清醒检查站。我们的主要研究目标是确定与常规做法相比,开展优化后的清醒检查站干预研究的障碍和促进因素。次要目标是评估驾车者对清醒检查站的支持程度以及通过检查站时的瞬间压力。
埃佩克斯警察局开展了6个检查站中的5个,并报告称与对照检查站相比,在优化后的检查站期间的运营能力和结果相似。例如,在优化后的检查站,平均有4名司机因涉嫌酒后驾车接受调查,而在对照检查站这一数字为2名。实地团队在试验时间表中的6个检查站中的4个对112名驾车者进行了拦截调查。在通过这些检查站的1045名驾车者中,调查回复率为11%。超过90%的受访者支持清醒检查站,与不饮酒者相比,在过去90天内报告饮酒的驾车者在检查站时的瞬间压力更大(比值比=6.7,95%置信区间:1.6,27.1)。
本研究结果表明,市政警察部门能够切实对清醒检查站进行优化,但使用实验性研究设计来评估优化后的检查站与常规做法相比的影响将非常困难。