Suppr超能文献

患者决策辅助支持的共享决策干预在老年人慢性阻塞性肺疾病的面对面和虚拟混合肺康复中的有效性:一项试点随机对照试验。

Effectiveness of patient decision aid supported shared decision-making intervention in in-person and virtual hybrid pulmonary rehabilitation in older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Research Office of Chronic Disease Management and Rehabilitation, Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.

Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.

出版信息

J Telemed Telecare. 2024 Dec;30(10):1532-1542. doi: 10.1177/1357633X231156631. Epub 2023 Mar 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Tele-pulmonary rehabilitation is increasingly advocated but cannot completely substitute for in-person services for chronic conditions. Adherence to Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) remains low in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Shared decision-making (SDM) promotes patients' participation in PR decisions and helps patients and healthcare providers to jointly make decisions that patients are informed and aligned with patient preferences and values, which are critical for patient adherence to PR.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop a hybrid in-person and virtual model of home-based PR services for older COPD patients and study the effectiveness of the patient decision aid (PDA)-supported recurring SDM intervention on patient adherence to PR, rehabilitation outcomes, and decision-related outcomes, as well as to explore the mechanisms of the intervention on PR adherence.

METHODS

A total of 78 older COPD patients were randomly assigned to the PR group ( = 39) or PDA-PR group ( = 39). Both groups were conducted hybrid in-person and virtual PR intervention for 3 months. The primary outcomes were patients' quality of life and PR adherence. The secondary outcomes were dyspnea symptoms, exercise self-efficacy, knowledge, and decision-related outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 72 participants completed the 3-month PR program. There were statistically significant differences in PR adherence ( = 0.033), COPD assessment test (CAT) scores ( = 0.016), PR knowledge ( < 0.001), decision self-efficacy ( < 0.001), decision conflict ( < 0.001), and decision regret scores ( = 0.027) between the two groups. The modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea scale (mMRC) score was significantly decreased only in PDA-PR group ( = 0.011). No statistically significant differences were observed in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score ( = 0.078), Exercise Self-Regulatory Efficacy Scale (Ex-SRES) score ( = 0.29) and COPD knowledge ( = 0.086) between the two groups. PR value score had a significant effect on adherence to PR ( = 0.007) and CAT score ( = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

PDA supported recurring SDM intervention was helpful in maintaining older COPD patients' PR adherence and had advantages in improving quality of life, enhancing PR knowledge, decision self-efficacy, and reducing decision conflict and decision regret, but did not improve SGRQ and Ex-SRES. PR value score influenced patients' rehabilitation adherence and quality of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR): ChiCTR1900028563; http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/default.aspx.

摘要

简介

远程肺康复越来越受到推崇,但无法完全替代慢性疾病的面对面服务。慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者对肺康复(PR)的依从性仍然较低。共同决策(SDM)促进患者参与 PR 决策,并帮助患者和医疗保健提供者共同做出决策,使患者知情并符合患者的偏好和价值观,这对患者对 PR 的依从性至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在为老年 COPD 患者开发一种基于家庭的混合面对面和虚拟 PR 服务模式,并研究基于患者决策辅助工具(PDA)的反复 SDM 干预对 PR 依从性、康复结果和决策相关结果的有效性,以及探讨干预对 PR 依从性的作用机制。

方法

共纳入 78 例老年 COPD 患者,随机分为 PR 组(n=39)或 PDA-PR 组(n=39)。两组均接受为期 3 个月的混合面对面和虚拟 PR 干预。主要结局是患者的生活质量和 PR 依从性。次要结局为呼吸困难症状、运动自我效能、知识和决策相关结局。

结果

共有 72 名参与者完成了 3 个月的 PR 计划。两组在 PR 依从性( = 0.033)、COPD 评估测试(CAT)评分( = 0.016)、PR 知识( < 0.001)、决策自我效能( < 0.001)、决策冲突( < 0.001)和决策后悔评分( = 0.027)方面存在统计学差异。仅在 PDA-PR 组 mMRC 评分显著降低( = 0.011)。两组在圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评分( = 0.078)、运动自我调节效能量表(Ex-SRES)评分( = 0.29)和 COPD 知识( = 0.086)方面无统计学差异。PR 值评分对 PR 依从性( = 0.007)和 CAT 评分( = 0.028)有显著影响。

结论

PDA 支持的反复 SDM 干预有助于维持老年 COPD 患者的 PR 依从性,在提高生活质量、增强 PR 知识、决策自我效能、降低决策冲突和决策后悔方面具有优势,但不能改善 SGRQ 和 Ex-SRES。PR 值评分影响患者的康复依从性和生活质量。

试验注册

中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR):ChiCTR1900028563;http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/default.aspx。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验