Jun Purumea, Zhao HuiYan, Jung In Chul, Kwon Ojin, Han Chang-Hyun, Won Jiyoon, Jang Jung-Hee
KM Science Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
University of Science & Technology, Campus of Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Korean Convergence Medical Science Major, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Feb 27;14:1108407. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1108407. eCollection 2023.
Parkinson's disease (PD), the second most common progressive neurodegenerative disease, causes heterogeneous clinical symptoms. Patients experience a range of motor and non-motor symptoms, and personalized diagnosis and treatment are needed. In traditional East Asian medicine, syndrome differentiation (SD) is a diagnostic approach for customized therapy that uses a comprehensive analysis and varies for the same disease. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of herbal medicine (HM) prescribed according to the SD of PD. Ten electronic databases were searched from inception to August 2021 without language limitations. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving HM for SD of PD were included. Assessment of Cochrane's risk of bias and meta-analysis and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation was also performed. Effect measurement was summarized using the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval, through a meta-analysis. Thirteen RCTs involving 843 participants were included. The overall risk of bias was either low or unclear. Compared with the placebo, a combined therapy of HM and Western medicine (WM) significantly improved the total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) (MD = -8.03, [-10.27, -5.79], < 0.00001; I = 0%) and was more beneficial, as assessed using the UPDRS (I-III), the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39, and the Non-Motor Symptoms Scale. Adverse events did not differ between the groups. The findings suggest that the combined treatment of WM and HM based on SD diagnosis has additional benefits in PD treatment. However, the methodological quality of the included RCTs was suboptimal. Nevertheless, this systematic review is the first to investigate the efficacy of HM treatment according to the SD diagnosis in PD. The clinically meaningful improvement in HM according to SD in PD needs to be tested in further studies with rigorous designs and longer follow-up periods. : [https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2021-10-0020/], identifier [INPLASY2021100020].
帕金森病(PD)是第二常见的进行性神经退行性疾病,会导致多种不同的临床症状。患者会出现一系列运动和非运动症状,因此需要个性化的诊断和治疗。在传统东亚医学中,辨证论治是一种用于定制治疗的诊断方法,它通过综合分析进行,对于同一种疾病会有所不同。我们旨在评估根据帕金森病辨证论治所开的草药(HM)的疗效。从数据库建立至2021年8月,我们检索了10个电子数据库,无语言限制。纳入了所有涉及草药治疗帕金森病辨证论治的随机对照试验(RCT)。还进行了Cochrane偏倚风险评估、荟萃分析以及推荐分级评估、制定和评价。通过荟萃分析,使用95%置信区间的平均差(MD)总结效应量。纳入了13项涉及843名参与者的随机对照试验。总体偏倚风险为低或不清楚。与安慰剂相比,草药与西药(WM)的联合治疗显著改善了帕金森病统一评分量表(UPDRS)总分(MD = -8.03,[-10.27,-5.79],<0.00001;I² = 0%),并且根据UPDRS(I-III)、帕金森病问卷-39和非运动症状量表评估,更为有益。两组之间不良事件无差异。研究结果表明,基于辨证诊断的西药和草药联合治疗在帕金森病治疗中具有额外益处。然而,纳入的随机对照试验的方法学质量欠佳。尽管如此,本系统评价是首次调查根据帕金森病辨证诊断进行草药治疗的疗效。帕金森病中根据辨证论治的草药治疗在临床上有意义的改善需要在设计更严谨、随访期更长的进一步研究中进行检验。: [https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2021-10-0020/],标识符[INPLASY2021100020]