Fiedler Klaus, Hofferbert Joscha, Wöllert Franz
Department of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 5;9:903. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00903. eCollection 2018.
The failure to exploit collective wisdom is evident in the conspicuous difficulty to solve hidden-profile tasks. While previous accounts focus on group-dynamics and motivational biases, the present research applies a metacognitive perspective to an ordinary learning approach. Assuming that evaluative learning is sensitive to the frequency with which targets are paired with positive versus negative attributes, selective repetition of targets' assets and deficits will inevitably bias the resulting evaluations. As selective repetition effects are ubiquitous, metacognitive monitoring and control functions are required to correct for repetition biases. However, three experiments show that metacognitive myopia prevents judges from correction, even when explicitly warned to ignore selective repetition (Experiment 1), when same-speaker repetitions rule out social validation (Experiment 2) and when blatant debriefing enforces superficial corrections (Experiment 3). For a comprehensive understanding of collective judgments and decisions, it is essential to take metacognitive monitoring and control into account.
在解决隐藏特征任务时明显存在的困难中,未能利用集体智慧的情况显而易见。虽然先前的研究侧重于群体动态和动机偏差,但本研究将元认知视角应用于一种普通的学习方法。假设评价性学习对目标与积极或消极属性配对的频率敏感,对目标优点和缺点的选择性重复将不可避免地使最终评价产生偏差。由于选择性重复效应无处不在,因此需要元认知监测和控制功能来纠正重复偏差。然而,三个实验表明,即使明确警告法官忽略选择性重复(实验1),当同一发言者的重复排除了社会验证(实验2)以及当公然的汇报促使进行表面纠正(实验3)时,元认知近视仍会阻止法官进行纠正。为了全面理解集体判断和决策,必须考虑元认知监测和控制。