Iturra Jacqueline Araújo Domingos, Leony Leonardo Maia, Medeiros Fernanda Alvarenga Cardoso, de Souza Filho Job Alves, Siriano Liliane da Rocha, Tavares Suelene Brito, Luquetti Alejandro Ostermayer, Belo Vinícius Silva, de Sousa Andréa Silvestre, Santos Fred Luciano Neves
Parasitic Diseases Service, Ezequiel Dias Foundation (FUNED), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Advanced Public Health Laboratory, Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ-BA), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 2;10:1031455. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1031455. eCollection 2023.
Diagnosis of () infection in the chronic phase of Chagas disease (CD) is performed by serologic testing. Conventional tests are currently used with very good results but require time, laboratory infrastructure, and expertise. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are an alternative as the results are immediate and do not require specialized knowledge, making them suitable for epidemiologic studies and promising as a screening tool. Nevertheless, few studies conducted comparative evaluations of RDTs to validate the results and assess their performance. In this study, we analyzed four trades of rapid tests (OnSite Chagas Ab Combo Rapid Test-United States, SD Bioline Chagas AB-United States, WL Check Chagas-Argentina, and TR Chagas Bio-Manguinhos-Brazil) using a panel of 190 samples, including sera from 111 infected individuals, most of whom had low antibody levels. An additional 59 samples from uninfected individuals and 20 sera from individuals with other diseases, mainly visceral leishmaniasis, were included. All tests were performed by three independent laboratories in a blinded manner. Results showed differences in sensitivity from 92.8 to 100%, specificity from 78.5 to 92.4%, and accuracy from 90.5 to 95.3% among the four assays. The results presented here show that all four RDTs have high overall diagnostic ability. However, WL Check Chagas and TR Chagas Bio-Manguinhos were considered most suitable for use in screening studies due to their high sensitivity combined with good performance. Although these two RDTs have high sensitivity, a positive result should be confirmed with other tests to confirm or rule out reactivity/positivity, especially considering possible cross-reactivity with individuals with leishmaniasis or toxoplasmosis.
查加斯病(CD)慢性期()感染的诊断通过血清学检测进行。目前使用的传统检测方法效果很好,但需要时间、实验室基础设施和专业知识。快速诊断检测(RDTs)是一种替代方法,因为其结果即时且不需要专业知识,使其适用于流行病学研究,并有望成为一种筛查工具。然而,很少有研究对RDTs进行比较评估以验证结果并评估其性能。在本研究中,我们使用一组190份样本分析了四种快速检测试剂盒(美国的OnSite Chagas Ab Combo快速检测试剂盒、美国的SD Bioline Chagas AB试剂盒、阿根廷的WL Check Chagas试剂盒和巴西的TR Chagas Bio - Manguinhos试剂盒),其中包括111名感染者的血清,他们大多数抗体水平较低。另外还纳入了59份未感染者的样本和20份患有其他疾病(主要是内脏利什曼病)个体的血清。所有检测均由三个独立实验室以盲法进行。结果显示,这四种检测方法的灵敏度在92.8%至100%之间,特异性在78.5%至92.4%之间,准确性在90.5%至95.3%之间。此处呈现的结果表明,所有四种RDTs都具有较高的总体诊断能力。然而,WL Check Chagas和TR Chagas Bio - Manguinhos因其高灵敏度和良好性能而被认为最适合用于筛查研究。尽管这两种RDTs具有高灵敏度,但阳性结果应以其他检测进行确认,以证实或排除反应性/阳性,特别是考虑到与利什曼病或弓形虫病患者可能存在的交叉反应。