• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of optical flow ratio: an individual patient-data meta-analysis.光学流比的诊断准确性:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
EuroIntervention. 2023 Jun 5;19(2):e145-e154. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-01098.
2
Diagnostic accuracy of intracoronary optical coherence tomography-derived fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary stenosis severity.冠状动脉光学相干断层成像衍生的血流储备分数评估冠状动脉狭窄严重程度的诊断准确性。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Jun 20;15(2):189-197. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00182.
3
Diagnostic performance of intracoronary optical coherence tomography-based versus angiography-based fractional flow reserve for the evaluation of coronary lesions.基于冠状动脉光学相干断层成像的与基于血管造影的血流储备分数在冠状动脉病变评估中的诊断性能。
EuroIntervention. 2020 Sep 18;16(7):568-576. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01034.
4
Comparison of Optical Flow Ratio and Fractional Flow Ratio in Stent-Treated Arteries Immediately After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.支架治疗后即刻经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的血流比和血流分数比的比较。
Circ J. 2020 Nov 25;84(12):2253-2258. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0661. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
5
Optical flow ratio for assessing stenting result and physiological significance of residual disease.光学流比值评估支架置入结果和残留病变的生理意义。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Dec 17;17(12):e989-e998. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00185.
6
Diagnostic efficacy of the optical flow ratio in patients with coronary heart disease: A meta-analysis.光学流比在冠心病患者中的诊断效能:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 May 10;18(5):e0285508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285508. eCollection 2023.
7
Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of optical flow ratio for functional evaluation of coronary stenosis in a prospective series.光学血流比在前瞻性系列中对冠状动脉狭窄的功能评估的诊断准确性和可重复性。
Cardiol J. 2020;27(4):350-361. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2020.0071. Epub 2020 May 21.
8
Clinical Validation of a Virtual Planner for Coronary Interventions Based on Coronary CT Angiography.基于冠状动脉 CT 血管造影术的冠状动脉介入虚拟规划器的临床验证。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Jul;15(7):1242-1255. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
9
Predictive value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血流储备分数的预测价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2023 Feb 28;9(2):99-108. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcac053.
10
Automated Algorithm Using Pre-Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve Pullback Curve to Predict Post-Intervention Physiological Results.应用介入前分流量储备回撤曲线的自动化算法预测介入后生理结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov 23;13(22):2670-2684. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.06.062. Epub 2020 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The Rise of Optical Coherent Tomography in Intracoronary Imaging: An Overview of Current Technology, Limitations, and Future Perspectives.光学相干断层扫描在冠状动脉内成像中的兴起:当前技术、局限性及未来展望综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Aug 29;26(8):38123. doi: 10.31083/RCM38123. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Relationship and prognostic value of the triglyceride-glucose index and optical coherence tomography-derived physiological index in patients with acute coronary syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者中甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数与光学相干断层扫描衍生生理指数的关系及预后价值
Sci Rep. 2025 May 14;15(1):16788. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96991-8.
3
Artificial intelligence for the analysis of intracoronary optical coherence tomography images: a systematic review.用于分析冠状动脉内光学相干断层扫描图像的人工智能:一项系统评价
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2025 Jan 28;6(2):270-284. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf005. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Assessment of fractal ratio of vessel diameters in coronary bifurcation lesions by angiography and intravascular ultrasound.通过血管造影和血管内超声评估冠状动脉分叉病变中血管直径的分形比。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2025 Jan;40(1):79-88. doi: 10.1007/s12928-024-01057-7. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
5
Association of vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) with luminal obstruction and plaque characteristics as detected by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients with NSTE-ACS: the FAST OCT study.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者中血管血流储备分数(vFFR)与光学相干断层扫描(OCT)检测到的管腔阻塞和斑块特征的相关性:FAST OCT研究
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Dec 31;26(1):49-59. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae212.
6
Diagnostic Performance of Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography-Modulated Quantitative Flow Ratio for Assessing Coronary Stenosis.冠状动脉内光学相干断层扫描调制定量血流比评估冠状动脉狭窄的诊断性能
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 May 31;2(5):101043. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101043. eCollection 2023 Sep-Oct.
7
An Overview of Computational Coronary Physiology Technologies Based on Medical Imaging and Artificial Intelligence.基于医学成像和人工智能的计算冠状动脉生理学技术概述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jun 13;25(6):211. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2506211. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Prognostic value of optical flow ratio for cardiovascular outcomes in patients after percutaneous coronary stent implantation.经皮冠状动脉支架植入术后患者光流比值对心血管结局的预后价值。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Dec 1;10:1247053. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1247053. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk Stratification in Acute Coronary Syndrome by Comprehensive Morphofunctional Assessment With Optical Coherence Tomography.采用光学相干断层扫描进行综合形态功能评估对急性冠状动脉综合征进行危险分层
JACC Asia. 2022 May 24;2(4):460-472. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.03.004. eCollection 2022 Aug.
2
Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI as Compared with Coronary Bypass Surgery.《血流储备分数指导下的 PCI 与冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较》。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jan 13;386(2):128-137. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2112299. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
3
Reproducibility of quantitative flow ratio: the QREP study.定量血流比的可重复性:QREP 研究。
EuroIntervention. 2022 Feb 18;17(15):1252-1259. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00425.
4
Optical flow ratio for assessing stenting result and physiological significance of residual disease.光学流比值评估支架置入结果和残留病变的生理意义。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Dec 17;17(12):e989-e998. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00185.
5
Accuracy of Intravascular Ultrasound-Based Fractional Flow Reserve in Identifying Hemodynamic Significance of Coronary Stenosis.血管内超声指导下的血流储备分数对冠状动脉狭窄的血流动力学意义的诊断准确性。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb;14(2):e009840. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009840. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
6
One-step anatomic and function testing by cardiac CT versus second-line functional testing in symptomatic patients with coronary artery stenosis: head-to-head comparison of CT-derived fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion imaging.采用心脏 CT 进行一步法解剖学和功能检测与二线功能检测在有症状的冠状动脉狭窄患者中的对比:基于 CT 的血流储备分数和心肌灌注成像的头对头比较。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Sep 20;17(7):576-583. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00905.
7
Comparison of Optical Flow Ratio and Fractional Flow Ratio in Stent-Treated Arteries Immediately After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.支架治疗后即刻经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的血流比和血流分数比的比较。
Circ J. 2020 Nov 25;84(12):2253-2258. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0661. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
8
Automatic stent reconstruction in optical coherence tomography based on a deep convolutional model.基于深度卷积模型的光学相干断层扫描自动支架重建
Biomed Opt Express. 2020 May 29;11(6):3374-3394. doi: 10.1364/BOE.390113. eCollection 2020 Jun 1.
9
Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of optical flow ratio for functional evaluation of coronary stenosis in a prospective series.光学血流比在前瞻性系列中对冠状动脉狭窄的功能评估的诊断准确性和可重复性。
Cardiol J. 2020;27(4):350-361. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2020.0071. Epub 2020 May 21.
10
Diagnostic performance of intracoronary optical coherence tomography-based versus angiography-based fractional flow reserve for the evaluation of coronary lesions.基于冠状动脉光学相干断层成像的与基于血管造影的血流储备分数在冠状动脉病变评估中的诊断性能。
EuroIntervention. 2020 Sep 18;16(7):568-576. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01034.

光学流比的诊断准确性:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。

Diagnostic accuracy of optical flow ratio: an individual patient-data meta-analysis.

机构信息

Biomedical Instrument Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

The Lambe Institute for Translational Research, Smart Sensors Laboratory and CURAM, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2023 Jun 5;19(2):e145-e154. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-01098.

DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-22-01098
PMID:36950895
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10242661/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optical flow ratio (OFR) is a novel method for the fast computation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) from optical coherence tomography.

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of OFR in assessing intermediate coronary stenosis using wire-based FFR as the reference.

METHODS

We performed an individual patient-level meta-analysis of all available studies with paired OFR and FFR assessments. The primary outcome was vessel-level diagnostic concordance of the OFR and FFR, using a cut-off of ≤0.80 to define ischaemia and ≤0.90 to define suboptimal post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) physiology. This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021287726).

RESULTS

Five studies were finally included, providing 574 patients and 626 vessels (404 pre-PCI and 222 post-PCI) with paired OFR and FFR from 9 international centres. Vessel-level diagnostic concordance of the OFR and FFR was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88%-94%), 87% (95% CI: 82%-91%), and 90% (95% CI: 87%-92%) in pre-PCI, post-PCI, and overall, respectively. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 84% (95% CI: 79%-88%), 94% (95% CI: 92%-96%), 90% (95% CI: 86%-93%), and 89% (95% CI: 86%-92%), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that a low pullback speed (odds ratio [OR] 7.02, 95% CI: 1.68-29.43; p=0.008) was associated with a higher risk of obtaining OFR values at least 0.10 higher than FFR. Increasing the minimal lumen area was associated with a lower risk of obtaining an OFR at least 0.10 lower than FFR (OR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.18-0.82; p=0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

This individual patient data meta-analysis demonstrated a high diagnostic accuracy of OFR. OFR has the potential to provide an improved integration of intracoronary imaging and physiological assessment for the accurate evaluation of coronary artery disease.

摘要

背景

光流比(OFR)是一种从光学相干断层扫描中快速计算分流量储备(FFR)的新方法。

目的

我们旨在评估 OFR 在评估中间冠状动脉狭窄时的诊断准确性,以基于导丝的 FFR 作为参考。

方法

我们对所有具有配对 OFR 和 FFR 评估的可用研究进行了个体患者水平的荟萃分析。主要结果是使用 ≤0.80 定义缺血和 ≤0.90 定义经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后不理想的生理学的血管水平诊断一致性。这项荟萃分析在 PROSPERO(CRD42021287726)中进行了注册。

结果

最终纳入了五项研究,来自 9 个国际中心的 574 名患者和 626 支血管(404 支 PCI 前和 222 支 PCI 后),具有配对的 OFR 和 FFR。OFR 和 FFR 的血管水平诊断一致性分别为 PCI 前 91%(95%置信区间[CI]:88%-94%)、PCI 后 87%(95% CI:82%-91%)和整体 90%(95% CI:87%-92%)。整体敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为 84%(95% CI:79%-88%)、94%(95% CI:92%-96%)、90%(95% CI:86%-93%)和 89%(95% CI:86%-92%)。多变量逻辑回归表明,较低的回撤速度(比值比[OR] 7.02,95% CI:1.68-29.43;p=0.008)与获得至少比 FFR 高 0.10 的 OFR 值的风险增加相关。最小管腔面积的增加与获得至少比 FFR 低 0.10 的 OFR 值的风险降低相关(OR 0.39,95% CI:0.18-0.82;p=0.013)。

结论

这项个体患者数据荟萃分析显示 OFR 的诊断准确性很高。OFR 有可能为准确评估冠状动脉疾病提供更好的腔内成像和生理学评估的整合。