Annadanam Surekha, Garg Gunjan, Fagerlin Angela, Powell Corey, Chen Emily, Segal Jonathan H, Ojo Akinlolu, Wright Nunes Julie
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Kidney Disease Program, Nephrology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
Kidney Med. 2023 Jan 20;5(4):100602. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100602. eCollection 2023 Apr.
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Multidisciplinary chronic kidney disease (CKD) care has been associated with improved clinical outcomes in comparison to general nephrology care. However, there is little research examining the impact of multidisciplinary care on patient-centered outcomes. We examined if a multidisciplinary approach to CKD care was associated with 4 patient-centered outcomes.
Cross-sectional study design using previously established surveys to assess patient-centered outcomes in participants with nondialysis CKD.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adults with CKD stages 1-5 who had not undergone transplant or were not on dialysis.
General nephrology care or multidisciplinary care. Patients receiving multidisciplinary care were seen by a pharmacist, social worker, dietitian, and nephrologist, whereas patients receiving general nephrology care only saw a nephrologist.
Four patient-centered outcomes: CKD-specific knowledge, disease-related stress, perception of overall health, and perception of health status compared to 1 year ago.
Differences were examined using a Welch 2-sample test and linear regression model.
Mean age of participants was 60 years with standard deviation of 17 years. 182 (77%) patients were White, and 230 (96%) had formal education greater than or equal to high school. 121 (49%) were women, and 215 (88%) had CKD stage 3-5. 77 (31%) received multidisciplinary care. We did not identify any significant differences in patient knowledge, stress, or perception of health between multidisciplinary and general nephrology care. However, notably, patients in multidisciplinary care were older and had more advanced CKD than those in general nephrology care.
Cross-sectional study designs only identify associations. Study was conducted at clinics located within 30 miles of each other, limiting generalizability.
Our results suggest that a team-based approach to care can better support sicker, more vulnerable patients so that they can achieve similar patient-centered outcomes compared to patients who are younger and with less advanced CKD.
与普通肾脏病护理相比,多学科慢性肾脏病(CKD)护理与改善临床结局相关。然而,很少有研究探讨多学科护理对以患者为中心的结局的影响。我们研究了CKD护理的多学科方法是否与4个以患者为中心的结局相关。
采用横断面研究设计,使用先前建立的调查问卷来评估非透析CKD参与者以患者为中心的结局。
1-5期CKD且未接受移植或未进行透析的成年人。
普通肾脏病护理或多学科护理。接受多学科护理的患者由药剂师、社会工作者、营养师和肾脏病医生诊治,而接受普通肾脏病护理的患者仅由肾脏病医生诊治。
4个以患者为中心的结局:CKD特异性知识、疾病相关压力、总体健康感知以及与1年前相比的健康状况感知。
使用韦尔奇两样本检验和线性回归模型检查差异。
参与者的平均年龄为60岁,标准差为17岁。182名(77%)患者为白人,230名(96%)接受过高中及以上正规教育。121名(49%)为女性,215名(88%)处于CKD 3-5期。77名(31%)接受了多学科护理。我们未发现多学科护理与普通肾脏病护理在患者知识、压力或健康感知方面存在任何显著差异。然而,值得注意的是,接受多学科护理的患者比接受普通肾脏病护理的患者年龄更大且CKD更严重。
横断面研究设计仅能确定关联。研究在相距30英里以内的诊所进行,限制了普遍性。
我们的结果表明,基于团队的护理方法可以更好地支持病情更重、更脆弱的患者,使他们能够实现与年龄较小、CKD较轻的患者相似的以患者为中心的结局。